PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Kathleen Kieran

Publications and source records attributed to Kathleen Kieran.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Ureteroscopy for symptomatic hydrocalices: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Hydrocalix is an uncommon condition that typically is treated with percutaneous dilation of the stenotic infundibulum. Ureteroscopy has the advantage of minimizing invasiveness. METHODS: We reviewed our experience with 12 retrograde ureteroscopies for hydrocalix in 10 patients. RESULTS: Access to the hydrocalix could not be achieved in one. Of the remaining 11, the original infundibulum was dilated in all but one, in whom neoinfundibulotomy was performed with a laser. The laser was used in eight cases, balloon dilation with cautery in two, and cautery alone in one. Of the seven hydrocalices bearing stones, four were rendered stone free. Immediate symptomatic success was achieved after 6 of the 11 evaluable procedures (one patient was lost to follow-up after a technically successful procedure). Of the five symptomatic failures, three went on to additional treatment (one ureteroscopy and two percutaneous), one elected against treatment despite recurrence of stenosis, and one had persistent pain owing to stones even though the hydrocalix was cured. Of the six symptomatic successes, three were without symptoms at a mean 25 months of follow-up, two have had recurrences necessitating additional treatment (both percutaneous) a mean of 51 months later, and one did not have adequate imaging follow-up. CONCLUSION: Ureteroscopy for hydrocalix achieved technical success in most patients, but relief of symptoms followed only about half of the procedures. A trial of ureteroscopy does not preclude subsequent success with a percutaneous approach. Ureteroscopy is a reasonable option for hydrocalix for patients who wish to avoid percutaneous surgery.

Adult↗

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: an update.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is considered the gold standard for renal donation. In the hands of experienced laparoscopists it provides a safe and equally effective alternative to open nephrectomy, and recipient graft function has been shown to be equivalent regardless of the procurement method utilized. Complication rates and postoperative donor renal function are equivalent to that of open nephrectomy, whereas recovery time is significantly shorter and surgical scars more cosmetic with the laparoscopic approach. RECENT FINDINGS: Advances in preoperative imaging and laparoscopic technique have enabled surgeons to broaden the patient population considered for donor nephrectomy. Improved three-dimensional imaging facilitates operative planning and intraoperative dissection, and the retroperitoneoscopic approach has decreased operative time. Acquisition of laparoscopic skills has also enabled surgeons to perform donor nephrectomies on kidneys that previously would have been considered less desirable for donation (e.g. right-sided or with anomalous vasculature). SUMMARY: End-stage renal disease and the need for renal transplantation continue to be major medical concerns in the United States and worldwide. Advances in donor nephrectomy have reduced the demand for organs by increasing the potential organ pool while limiting risk to donors. As imaging and laparoscopic techniques continue to advance, it is anticipated that minimally invasive donor nephrectomy will continue to evolve. This review summarizes the developments to date.

Costs and Cost Analysis↗