PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Kathleen M Elliott

Publications and source records attributed to Kathleen M Elliott.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2004

The effects of a pre-movement delay on the kinematics of prehension in middle childhood.

The present study examined the effects of a pre-movement delay on the kinematics of prehension in middle childhood. Twenty-five children between the ages of 5 and 11 years made visually open-loop reaches to two different sized objects at two different distances along the midline. Reaches took place either (i) immediately, or (ii) 2 s after the occlusion of the stimulus. In all age groups, reaches following the pre-movement delay were characterised by longer movement durations, lower peak velocities, larger peak grip apertures and longer time spent in the final slow phase of the movement. This pattern of results suggests that the representations that control the transport and grasp component are affected similarly by delay, and is consistent with the results previously reported for adults. Such representations therefore appear to develop before the age of 5.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗
PubMed2004

Binocular cues and the control of prehension.

The present study was designed to assess the importance of binocular information (i.e. binocular disparity and angle of convergence) in the control of prehension. Previous studies which have addressed this question have typically used the same experimental manipulation: comparing prehensile movements executed either under binocular conditions to those executed when one eye was occluded (monocular). However this may not be the correct comparison as in addition to depriving the subject of binocular depth cues. it also deprives the subject of any visual information in one eye. Therefore we determined the prehensile performance when the subject viewed the target object and scene with either (i) two different views (binocular), (ii) two identical views (bi-ocular), or (iii) one view only (monocular). Overall, the qualitative and quantitative performance in the bi-ocular and monocular control conditions was very similar on all the main measures (and different from the performance in the binocular condition). We conclude that the deficits in performance observed found for 'monocular' reaches should be attributed to the lack of local depth information specified by the binocular cues. In addition we speculate that convergence angle and binocular disparity, although involved in both the pre-movement and movement-execution phases of the reach, the cues may be weighted differently in both phases of a prehension movement depending on the behavioural strategy involved.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

The role of binocular information in the 'on-line' control of prehension.

Binocular visual information may be involved in the selection of appropriate motor programs before a reach is executed or it may be involved during the movement-execution phase in order to monitor and guide the hand to the target object. Here we introduced binocular information after 0%, 25%, 50% or 75% of the movement-execution phase and determined its effects on the kinematic indices of prehensile movements made to objects of different sizes placed at different distances. Kinematic indices linked to the transport component, such as peak velocity and time-to-peak velocity, were unaffected by the presence of binocular cues whereas later occurring indices, such as peak grip aperture and time in the slow phase, were significantly affected. Although the magnitude of the peak grip was affected by the presence of binocular cues, the time at which it occurred did not change. This pattern of results suggest that the visuo-motor control of prehensile movements utilises both feedforward and feedback strategies and that binocular cues are particularly important for the fine manual adjustments typical of the latter.

Adult↗