Biomedical subjects

Kathleen Shive Matthews

Publications and source records attributed to Kathleen Shive Matthews.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Extrinsic interactions dominate helical propensity in coupled binding and folding of the lactose repressor protein hinge helix.

A significant number of eukaryotic regulatory proteins are predicted to have disordered regions. Many of these proteins bind DNA, which may serve as a template for protein folding. Similar behavior is seen in the prokaryotic LacI/GalR family of proteins that couple hinge-helix folding with DNA binding. These hinge regions form short alpha-helices when bound to DNA but appear to be disordered in other states. An intriguing question is whether and to what degree intrinsic helix propensity contributes to the function of these proteins. In addition to its interaction with operator DNA, the LacI hinge helix interacts with the hinge helix of the homodimer partner as well as to the surface of the inducer-binding domain. To explore the hierarchy of these interactions, we made a series of substitutions in the LacI hinge helix at position 52, the only site in the helix that does not interact with DNA and/or the inducer-binding domain. The substitutions at V52 have significant effects on operator binding affinity and specificity, and several substitutions also impair functional communication with the inducer-binding domain. Results suggest that helical propensity of amino acids in the hinge region alone does not dominate function; helix-helix packing interactions appear to also contribute. Further, the data demonstrate that variation in operator sequence can overcome side chain effects on hinge-helix folding and/or hinge-hinge interactions. Thus, this system provides a direct example whereby an extrinsic interaction (DNA binding) guides internal events that influence folding and functionality.

Bacterial Proteins↗

PubMed2005

Integrated insights from simulation, experiment, and mutational analysis yield new details of LacI function.

Protein structural change underlies many signal transduction processes. Although end-state structures are known for various allosteric proteins, intermediates are difficult to observe. Recently, targeted molecular dynamics simulation (TMD) was used to examine the conformational transition and predict relevant intermediates for wild-type lactose repressor (LacI). A catalog of involved residues suggests that the transition of this homodimer is asymmetric and that K84 is a prominent participant in the dynamic N-subdomain interface. Previous experiments indicated that hydrophobic substitutions at position 84 engender slowed, biphasic inducer binding kinetics, which might reflect the same phenomena observed in TMD. Here, we report biochemical confirmation that DNA and inducer binding remain allosterically linked in K84A and K84L, albeit with a differential smaller than that found in wild-type LacI. Other features of these mutant proteins are consistent with an allosteric conformational shift that approximates that of the wild type. As a consequence, these repressors can be utilized to explore an unanswered question about LacI function: How many inducers (one or two per dimer) are required to diminish operator affinity? The biphasic natures of the K84L and K84A inducer association rates allow direct correlation between the two distinct inducer binding events and operator release. Indeed, the kinetics of operator release for the K84A and K84L closely parallel those for the second inducer binding event. Together with implications from previous equilibrium results for wild-type and mutant proteins, these kinetic data demonstrate that binding of two inducers per dimeric DNA binding unit is required to release the operator in these variant LacI proteins.

Amino Acid Substitution↗

PubMed2002

Human p53 phosphorylation mimic, S392E, increases nonspecific DNA affinity and thermal stability.

DNA binding is crucial to the protective role of the tumor suppressor protein p53, a nuclear phosphoprotein and transcription factor. The mutant human p53 protein S392E is a phosphorylation mimic that has been previously demonstrated to represent an "activated" form of p53 in both in vivo and in vitro assays [Hupp and Lane (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 18165; Hao et al. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 29380]. Herein, we describe an analysis of structural and functional differences between this mutant and the wild-type protein. Structurally, the S392E protein exhibits increased thermal stability compared to wild-type p53, as monitored by circular dichroism and conformational antibody Ab1620 reactivity. These structural effects include alterations to the core DNA binding domain, remote in sequence space from the site of mutation. Functionally, the S392E mutation does not increase p53 binding to its 20 bp consensus DNA sequence in the absence of nonspecific DNA additives. In contrast, affinity of S392E for a 20 bp nonspecific DNA sequence is enhanced. Embedding 20 bp consensus DNA in the context of longer DNA sequences does not substantially alter S392E affinity, whereas wild-type affinity for these DNAs decreases with increased proportion of nonspecific DNA. These differences may account for the S392E "activated" phenotype and illuminate the role of this modified p53 in vivo.

Base Sequence↗

PubMed2002

Fine-tuning function: correlation of hinge domain interactions with functional distinctions between LacI and PurR.

LacI and PurR are highly homologous proteins. Their functional units are homodimers, with an N-terminal DNA binding domain that comprises the helix-turn-helix (HTH), N-linker, and hinge regions from both monomers. Hinge structural changes are known to occur upon DNA dissociation but are difficult to monitor experimentally. The initial steps of hinge unfolding were therefore examined using molecular dynamics simulations, utilizing a truncated, chimeric protein comprising the LacI HTH/N-linker and PurR hinge. A terminal Gly-Cys-Gly was added to allow "dimerization" through disulfide bond formation. Simulations indicate that differences in LacI and PurR hinge primary sequence affect the quaternary structure of the hinge x hinge' interface. However, these alternate hinge orientations would be sterically restricted by the core domain. These results prompted detailed comparison of recently available DNA-bound structures for LacI and truncated LacI(1-62) with the PurR structure. Examination revealed that different N-linker and hinge contacts to the core domain of the partner monomer (which binds effector molecule) affect the juxtapositions of the HTH, N-linker, and hinge regions in the DNA binding domain. In addition, the two full-length repressors exhibit significant differences in the interactions between the core and the C-linker connection to the DNA binding domain. Both linkers and the hinge have been implicated in the allosteric response of these repressors. Intriguingly, one functional difference between these two proteins is that they exhibit opposite allosteric response to effector. Simulations and observed structural distinctions are correlated with mutational analysis and sequence information from the LacI/GalR family to formulate a mechanism for fine-tuning individual repressor function.

Bacterial Proteins↗