PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Kathryn A Atchison

Publications and source records attributed to Kathryn A Atchison.

18 recordsLinked to original sources

Risk factors for fractures in older men and women: The Leisure World Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis results in >1.5 million fractures in the United States each year, leading to substantial health care costs and loss of quality of life. One major gap in our knowledge is how to effectively identify individuals at risk of developing a fracture. OBJECTIVE: We examined a population-based cohort for risk factors for fractures of the hip, wrist, and spine in men and women. METHODS: The Leisure World Cohort Study was established between 1981 and 1985 when residents of a southern California retirement community completed a postal health survey. Multiple lifestyle, medical, attitudinal, and anthropomorphic factors were self-reported. Fractures were identified from 4 follow-up surveys, hospital discharge records, and death certificates. Fracture rates were determined separately for men and women. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify predictors of fracture. RESULTS: Incident fractures of the hip (n = 1,227), wrist (n = 445), and spine (n = 729) incurred over the course of 2 decades were identified in the 13,978 residents surveyed. Mean (SD) age at entry was 74.9 (7.2) years for men and 73.7 (7.4) years for women. The most important risk factors for fracture were the same in men and women: age increased risk of hip and spine fractures (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.3-3.2 per 10 years) and history of fracture increased fracture risk at all 3 sites (HR = 1.4-3.2). In both men and women, glaucoma was a significant risk factor for hip fracture (HR = 1.9 and 1.3, respectively), and smoking was a risk factor for hip and spine fractures. Men and women with a positive mental attitude had fewer hip and spine fractures (HR = 0.7-0.9). High body mass index was protective at all 3 fracture sites in women (HR = 0.7-0.8), but those who used vitamin A supplements had increased rates of hip and wrist fracture (HR = 1.1 per 10,000 IU per day). CONCLUSIONS: Attitude, lifestyle choices, and the presence of medical conditions may influence the rate of osteoporotic fracture in older women and men and may help identify individuals at high risk.

Aged↗

Using patient self-report data to evaluate orofacial surgical outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: This study analyzes results of 336 patients treated for mandible fractures at King/Drew Medical Center in South Central Los Angeles, California from August 1996 to December 2001. Subjects were enrolled in a prospective study to evaluate the association between patient's subjective evaluation and objective clinical evaluations on three surgical outcome measures following orofacial surgery. METHODS: Subjects were assessed at four time periods--hospital discharge, 10 days post-discharge, 1 month post-discharge and 6 months post-discharge. Three outcome measures were utilized to represent perceived health and oral health-related quality of life--General Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI); Mental Health Inventory (MHI-5); and a single-item self-reported health status measure. RESULTS: GOHAI scores at 1 month (mean=31.5, SD=9.5) were not substantially higher than at 10 days (mean=28.6, SD=8.8), but scores did improve substantially by 6 months (mean=42.6, SD=10.6). Mean mental health scores ranged from 17.7 at 10 days to 18.0 at 1 month and 18.6 at 6 months. Mean self-reported health status score were approximately 2.2 at all recalls, describing health as 'good.' A longitudinal growth curve analysis of GOHAI scores over four time periods indicated a significantly higher average intercept for the maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) treatment group (29.67) than in the rigid internal fixation (RIF) treatment group (25.38). Meanwhile, the increase in GOHAI scores over time was significantly greater in the RIF group than in the MMF group, resulting in scores being comparable between groups after 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: By implication, patients with MMF self-report fewer problems in the early days after placement of the intra-arch wire compared with patients with RIF.

Adolescent↗

Decision-making process for treatment of mandibular fractures among minority groups.

OBJECTIVES: While patients' preferences for medical care are widely studied, only a small number of studies have looked at the decision-making process for dental treatment of mandibular fracture. This study examines the decision-making process for treatment of mandibular fractures among minority groups. Study participants were asked to consider Maxillomandibular Fixation (MMF--a non-surgical approach of wiring the teeth for 4-8 weeks) or Rigid Internal Fixation (RIF--surgical placement of bone plate). METHODS: A qualitative study of patients receiving care at an inner-city hospital for either 3rd molar extraction under general anesthesia or a mandibular fracture were recruited to participate in an hour-long focus group to discuss their preferences. The 3rd molar group was selected as a comparison group exemplifying experience with oral surgery and recovery from general anesthesia. RESULTS: Seven decision-making factors affecting choice of treatment were discussed by both jaw fracture and 3rd molar groups, including: side effects, effectiveness of each treatment, trusting doctor's recommendation, what to expect from each procedure, use of pictures from previous case studies, surgery location of scar/incision, and size of scar. Rigid Internal Fixation (RIF) participants discussed a different set of concerns compared to Maxillomandibular Fixation (MMF) participants. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of gender, the treatment of choice for both 3rd molar and jaw fracture participants was the non-surgical method of wiring of the teeth for 4-8 weeks. The Phase II part of this study will systematically examine patient preferences among a larger sample of 3rd molar and jaw fracture patients by incorporating the patient-reported concerns about treatment of jaw fracture found in this inductive, phenomenological study.

Black or African American↗

A qualitative study of hardiness and social support among underserved, inner-city minority adults recovering from oral surgery.

Using qualitative data, this study examines hardiness and social support among twenty-two African American and Hispanic subjects, at least 18 years of age, who received treatment for a jaw fracture and participated in an hour-long focus group to discuss the treatment they received at King/Drew Medical Center, an inner-city hospital in Los Angeles, California. Treatment was either a non-surgical wiring of the teeth closed for six to eight weeks or surgical placement of a metal bone plate in the lower jaw with a short period of jaw fixation following surgery. A mandibular fracture is one of the most common orofacial traumas for minority individuals, and the majority of these fractures among patients at urban trauma centers are a result of interpersonal violence. Thus the link between psychosocial stress and oral health is evident, yet exposure to daily stress does not automatically place one at risk for distress. Some people under daily stress have hardiness, conceptualized as an internal personal resource consisting of control, commitment, and challenge. This study examines hardiness and social support relevant to an underserved, minority population. Hardiness and social support were identified and noted in order of frequency according to participant characteristics of treatment type, gender, and ethnicity. Main themes related to hardiness and social support are highlighted with verbatim quotes providing additional context to the theme presented.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

A qualitative report of patient problems and postoperative instructions.

PURPOSE: While surgery related stress may interfere with the patient's ability to concentrate on instructions, language difficulty or low health literacy may also impede appropriate doctor/patient communication. The purpose of this study is to understand from a sample of minority patients the types of problems encountered during healing and the level of information regarding elements of postoperative instructions they recalled receiving at an inner-city safety net hospital. We initiated a qualitative study to understand the care sequence process and provision of informed consent and postoperative instruction. METHODS: African American or Latino patients, 18 years of age or older, who had third molars removed under general anesthesia or received treatment for a mandibular fracture were recruited to participate in a focus group to discuss their treatment. Patients described their problem and any informed consent given about treatment risks and benefits and postoperative information they recalled. RESULTS: A total of 137 former patients were approached, 57 agreed to participate (42%) and 34 of those (60%) completed the interview. Subjects included 14 females and 20 males. Five categories of patient problems were reported: physical, eating, treatment-related, psychosocial, and other problems. People reported 5 categories of coping strategies: medication use, physical treatments, dietary solutions, rest, and clinical assistance. Twenty people recalled being given informed consent, and 5 participants recalled no elements of informed consent. Overall, 14 participants recalled elements of postoperative instruction. CONCLUSION: Gaps in patient understanding of postoperative care suggest room for improvement in postoperative instructions. Additional research is necessary to design and test high-quality postoperative instructions for surgical treatment and recovery in populations with limited health related literacy.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

Menstrual and reproductive factors and fracture risk: the Leisure World Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Because menopausal estrogen is related to the development of osteoporosis, we investigated the potential associations of the estrogen-related events of menarche, pregnancy, and menopause with fracture risk in a population-based, prospective study of older women. METHODS: The Leisure World Cohort was established in the early 1980s when residents of a California retirement community, including 8877 women, completed a health survey. Incident fractures of the hip (n = 1220), wrist (n = 463), and spine (n = 613) incurred over two decades were identified from four follow-up questionnaires, hospital discharge records, and (for hip fracture) death certificates. Hazard ratios (HR) adjusted for age and other potential confounders were calculated using proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Late age at menarche was associated with decreased hip fracture risk (HR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.72-0.98, for age > or = 14 vs. < or = 12 years) but was unrelated to fractures at other sites. Hip fracture risk was also reduced in women who had been pregnant (HR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.72- 0.95). Women who reported menopause at age 45+ had a lower risk of wrist fracture compared with those with menopause at age < or = 44 (HR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.58-0.95 for ages 45-54; HR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.49-1.04 for ages 55+). Although fracture risks did not differ between ever and never users of menopausal estrogen, recency since last use was related to wrist fractures (HR = 1.09, 95% CI 1.03-1.16 for each 5 years since last years). CONCLUSIONS: The estrogen-related events of menarche, pregnancy, and menopause were not associated with osteoporotic fracture risk in a consistent manner. Other factors related to these events may be influencing development of osteoporosis and the likelihood of sustaining a fracture in older women.

Aged↗

Pipeline, profession, and practice program: evaluating change in dental education.

This article describes the conceptual and analytical framework that will be used to assess the effectiveness of the Pipeline, Profession, and Practice: Community-Based Dental Education Program. The evaluation will use a mixed method qualitative and quantitative data collection, analysis, and triangulation. Baseline measures are reported using data from the 2003 ADEA survey of dental school seniors. Baseline measures show the dental schools are confronting a major recruitment challenge that will require short and long pipeline efforts to attract and retain underrepresented and low-income (URM/LI) persons. Gaps were found between the perceptions of URM and non-URM students in the adequacy of the curricula. The majority of all seniors described the current extramural clinical rotations as positive experiences, but URMs were more likely to report the experience improved their ability to care for diverse groups.

Community Dentistry↗

Understanding health behavior and perceptions.

Oral health and general health status depend on a dynamic interplay of many factors, including the individual's personal characteristics, behaviors, and perceptions. There are differences and disparities among different racial and ethnic groups in terms of oral health status, and in the physical, socioeconomic, cultural, and political environment. Furthermore, response to the environment may vary among individuals and populations. Access to care and patient-provider interactions are key issues to consider. This article presents a conceptual model of the variable influences on behaviors and perceptions that determine oral health status in minority and other populations.

Delivery of Health Care↗

Views of practicing dentists regarding a mandatory fifth year of training.

As part of a U.S. Health Resources and Services Administration-funded evaluation of the impact of federal funding on postgraduate general dentistry programs, a random sample of 6,725 dentists graduating in 1989, 1993, and 1997 were surveyed regarding practice patterns, advanced training, populations served, services provided, and their position on a mandatory fifth year of training. Responses (1,965) showed 48 percent supporting a mandatory year and 52 percent not supportive. Open-ended comments were provided by 1,626 respondents. The main reasons for supporting a mandatory fifth year were the need for more instructional time and need for a transition year. Individual choice, no value in a fifth year of dental school, mentoring available elsewhere, and cost were cited in opposition. The following respondents were significantly more likely than other respondents to support a mandatory fifth year: individuals who had completed an AEGD, GPR, or specialty program; were Asian; held salaried positions in a community clinic, nursing home, or hospital; or described themselves as a consultant. Graduates in 1993 and 1997 were less supportive of a mandatory fifth year than were 1989 graduates. Significant differences in the reasons offered in support of respondents' positions on the issue were observed among AEGD, GPR, specialists, and nonspecialists and the three cohort years.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Analysis of federal support for postgraduate general dentistry.

We compared the funding granted by the federal government between 1985 and 1997 to stimulate the growth of AEGD and GPR programs across HRSA regions, states, and populations. Information regarding the number, size, and location of programs available during the time period of 1985 to 1997 was collected. During this period, although the number of programs remained constant, the composition of the programs changed, with AEGD programs increasing by 113 percent and GPR programs decreasing by 13 percent. HRSA Regions 2, 3, and 5 combined offered over 50 percent of all programs. The number of residency positions rose by 28 percent in civilian programs and dropped by 11 percent in Veterans and Military (VA/M) positions. Overall growth in AEGD positions increased 208 percent, while the civilian GPR positions remained constant and the number of VA/M GPR positions dropped by 30 percent. A higher percentage increase in programs occurred in cities of greater than 500,000 population than in less densely populated areas. HRSA spent dollar 41,254,501 in the thirteen-year time frame, and funding by region varied by over a hundredfold. Programs in the least dense population groups were often the least funded. There was great variability in the amount of HRSA money received by state, with fifteen states receiving no funding during the thirteen years. Without HRSA dollars, it is apparent that the postgraduate general dental training program would not have gained the vitality it currently offers. However, attention must be paid to developing programs among states with a lack of infrastructure in dental education and training.

Costs and Cost Analysis↗

Is depressive symptomatology associated with worse oral functioning and well-being among older adults?

OBJECTIVES: Although depression negatively affects individuals' physical functioning and well-being, its association with oral functioning and well-being has not been examined previously. The objective of this study was to examine the association between depressive symptomatology and oral quality of life. METHODS: We utilized data from two samples of older adults: community-dwelling participants who used community primary care physicians in Los Angeles (n=1,653) and individuals who sought ambulatory care through four Department of Veterans Affairs facilities in the Boston metropolitan area (n=212). Depressive symptomatology was measured with the CES-D scale; Oral Quality of Life was measured with the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Instrument and the Oral Health-related Quality of Life measure. We conducted hierarchical regression analyses to examine the effects of depression on oral quality of life, controlling for self-reported oral health, age, education, income, and marital status. RESULTS: Individuals with more depressive symptoms reported worse oral quality of life, controlling for sociodemographic factors and self-reported oral health. This finding persisted across multiple samples and both sexes, and using two measures of oral quality of life. CONCLUSION: These findings further emphasize the importance of treating depression among older adults, and suggest that both dentists and physicians have a role in recognizing and referring patients for such treatment.

Aged↗

Critical issues for dentistry: PGD program directors respond.

Discussion of critical issues facing postgraduate education in general dentistry (PGD) and dental education in general has been intense in the past decade. This study reports on critical issues raised by directors of PGD programs that may help direct future research and action within dental education and the larger profession. The analysis reports responses to an open-ended question sent to all U.S. PGD program directors regarding critical issues facing their training programs. Of 212 surveys, 169 program directors submitted written responses regarding critical issues. Twelve unique themes were identified: lack of postdoctoral applicants (two subthemes were high student debt and students' preference for private practice); student quality; professionalism and attitudes; number of postdoctoral positions; lack of funding; quality of facilities; special patient care; program curriculum; educator issues; mandatory or encouraged PGD year; value of dental program; and dentist shortage. Significant differences between AEGD and GPR directors were observed for two of the twelve areas: high student debt and value of dental program. The study provided insight into the thoughts of a large proportion of the U.S. PGD program directors "in the trenches." Some consideration of allowable expenses may be needed to align federal training support to best address program director needs.

Administrative Personnel↗

Military and VA general dentistry training: a national resource.

In 1999, HRSA contracted with the UCLA School of Dentistry to evaluate the postgraduate general dentistry (PDG) training programs. The purpose of this article is to compare the program characteristics of the PGD training programs sponsored by the Armed Services (military) and VA. Surveys mailed to sixty-six VA and forty-two military program directors in fall 2000 sought information regarding the infrastructure of the program, the program emphasis, resident preparation prior to entering the program, and a description of patients served and types of services provided. Of the eighty-one returned surveys (75 percent response rate), thirty were received from military program directors and fifty-one were received from VA program directors. AEGDs reported treating a higher proportion of children patients and GPRs more medically intensive, disadvantaged and HIV/AIDS patients. Over half of the directors reported increases in curriculum emphasis in implantology. The program directors reported a high level of inadequate preparation among incoming dental residents. Having a higher ratio of residents to total number of faculty predicted inadequate preparation (p=.022) although the model was weak. Although HRSA doesn't financially support federally sponsored programs, their goal of improved dental training to care for medically compromised individuals is facilitated through these programs, thus making military and VA general dentistry programs a national resource.

Adult↗

Curriculum emphasis and resident preparation in postgraduate general dentistry programs.

In 1999 HRSA contracted with the UCLA School of Dentistry to evaluate the impact of federal funding on postgraduate general dentistry programs. Part of that evaluation analyzed curriculum emphasis and preparation of incoming residents in advanced general dentistry programs over a five-year period. Directors of 208 civilian AEGD and GPR programs were surveyed about the curriculum content of their programs, increased or decreased emphasis in thirty subject areas, and resident preparation and quality (GPA and National Board scores). Results indicate that curriculum changes in AEGD and GPR programs over the time period have been responsive to the changing nature of general practice. At least half of all program directors reported that their residents were less than adequately prepared in fourteen curriculum areas. Sub-analyses were conducted for AEGD/GPR programs and HRSA-funded versus nonfunded programs. Multivariate regression identified lower student quality as the most important program variable in predicting a perceived need for resident remediation. Logistic regression showed that programs with higher resident GPA and National Board Part I scores had less difficulty filling resident positions.

Adolescent↗

Characteristics of civilian postdoctoral general dentistry programs.

U.S. civilian (non-VA/non-military) Advanced Education in General Dentistry (AEGD) and General Practice Residency (GPR) programs were identified (n=208) and surveyed. The assessment evaluated infrastructure support, populations served, services provided, and trainee stipends. One hundred thirty-one programs responded (thirty-two AEGD, 64 percent/ninety-nine GPR, 63 percent). Sixty-nine programs were HRSA-funded (53 percent), and sixty-three (47 percent) were nonfunded. One hundred and five responses identified hospital/medical center resources; fifty-six indicated dental school support. Mean faculty support was similar regardless of program type or HRSA funding. Mean first-year positions in AEGDs were greater than GPRs. Mean first-year GPR positions were greater in funded than in nonfunded programs. A comparison of AEGD and GPR programs showed that residents in GPRs treated more children, medically intensive, economically/socially disadvantaged, and in-patient/same-day surgery patients (p<0.05). Residents in AEGDs treated more healthy adults (p<0.05). GPRs treated more lower fee (no pay, Medicaid, welfare/general relief, Medicare, and capitation/HMO) patients. AEGDs treated more insurance/private pay patients (p=.0001). No differences existed in comprehensive care and emergency visits between AEGDs and GPRs. GPRs treated more hospital-based patients. The mean stipends for GPRs ($32,055) and AEGDs ($22,403) were different.

Adult↗

PGD training and its impact on general dentist practice patterns.

This study compares the practice patterns of general dentists with and without formal advanced training in AGED or GPR programs. The UCLA School of Dentistry surveyed a random selection of dentists from graduating years 1989, 1993, and 1997 as part of a Health Resources Services Administration (HRSA)-supported evaluation of the impact of federal funding on postgraduate general dentistry (PGD) programs. Using a sample drawn by the American Dental Association (ADA), 6,725 dentists were surveyed about their practice, advanced training, patients served, and services provided. Of the 2,029 dentists (30 percent) who responded, 49 percent were practicing dentists with no formal advanced training in general dentistry or one of the eight ADA specialties; 7 percent had Advanced Education in General Dentistry (AEGD) experience; 20 percent trained in a General Practice Residency (GPR); and 24 percent were specialists. Additionally, 7 percent of respondents had PGD training and a clinical specialty. GPR-trained dentists were significantly more likely to be on a hospital staff and to treat medically compromised patients even after ten years of practice. PGD dentists were less likely to seek specialty training. Major reasons for seeking PGD training were increasing treatment speed, learning to treat medically compromised patients, and wanting hospital experience. Primary reasons for not selecting training were starting a practice and having a great practice opportunity. Our conclusion is that PGD training has an enduring impact on practice patterns and improves access to dental care for underserved populations.

Analysis of Variance↗

Gender differences in career and practice patterns of PGD-trained dentists.

This study compares differences by gender in the practice patterns and professional activities of general dentists, specialists, and dentists with Advanced Education in General Dentistry (AEGD) or General Practice Residency (GPR) training. The UCLA School of Dentistry surveyed a random sample of 6,725 dentists graduating from dental school in 1989, 1993, and 1997 as part of an evaluation of the impact of federal funding on postgraduate general dentist (PGD) programs. The survey asked about current practice, services referred and provided, and professional activities. Of the 2,029 dentists (30 percent) who responded, 49 percent were general dentists with no specialty training; 7 percent had AEGD training; 20 percent had GPR training; and 24 percent had specialty training. General dentists were more likely to be in private practice (p < 0.05). AEGDs, specialists, and females were more likely to report faculty positions as a secondary occupation. General dentists were more likely to be practice owners than AEGD- or GPR-trained dentists. The mean number of patients seen was highest for specialists. Females reported fewer patients than males, and this difference was significant for GPR-trained dentists. With respect to services, GPR-trained dentists reported significantly more biopsy procedures, conscious sedation, periodontal surgery, and implants than general dentists. AEGD-trained dentists reported more conscious sedation than general dentists. GPR dentists were more likely to volunteer time than general dentists without specialty training. PGD training appears to result in different types of employment and specific practice patterns that strengthen primary care dentistry. We further conclude that there are gender differences in the types of practice, patients seen, and services provided. These findings occur in addition to training differences.

Career Choice↗