PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Katie Snape

Publications and source records attributed to Katie Snape.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

CanVar-UK: A collaborative platform for germline interpretation in cancer susceptibility genes.

Germline variants in cancer susceptibility genes (CSGs) are typically inherited rather than arising de novo. Hence, wide cascade testing of families across geographies is common, meaning consistency in variant classification is particularly critical. Variant interpretation requires collation of variant-level data from diverse sources, as well as assembly of comprehensive clinical data, often necessitating sharing of information between genomic testing centers. Here, we describe CanVar-UK, a freely accessible web platform bespoke designed to support interpretation of germline CSG variants. CanVar-UK contains variant-level data for over 1.1 million single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), comprising all possible coding SNVs in 116 established CSGs. The data sources with which variants are annotated include in silico scores from 11 clinically relevant tools, population allele frequencies from gnomAD v4.1, case counts from multiple cohorts, including National Health Service (NHS) clinical laboratory testing, variant-level readouts from 47 selected functional and splicing datasets across 19 CSGs, genetic epidemiology studies, and live linkage to existing consensus classifications in the ClinVar database. The diagnostic discussion forum is only available to registered diagnostic scientist users. Through this, a variant-tagged email message can be dispatched in real time across the diagnostic forum community of >1,500 users, with all exchanges and classifications captured and stored in the platform. Already widely used by NHS diagnostic clinical scientists in the UK, CanVar-UK has a rapidly growing international diagnostic user base (>800 UK and >600 non-UK registered users). Survey of the NHS diagnostic user community illustrates the wide-ranging utility of CanVar-UK within their clinical workflows for interpretation of germline CSG variants.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2026

Expert consensus on the reporting and clinical follow up of individuals with incidentally discovered germline RET variants in the UK.

Incidentally discovered pathogenic germline genetic variants refer to the finding of a pathogenic variant in a gene that is unrelated to the reason for the initial test and is not actively sought. Our clinical understanding of the risk of developing a particular medical condition and the required clinical action for a specific pathogenic gene variant is predominantly based on knowledge and information acquired from cases ascertained through a 'phenotype-first approach' rather than in clinically unselected individuals. Therefore, a modified approach is required for incidentally discovered gene variants. Data from large UK and US population-based cohorts have demonstrated that RET variants classified as moderate-risk RET variants as per the American Thyroid Association (ATA) classification have a low penetrance for medullary thyroid cancer and other RET-related conditions (e.g. phaeochromocytoma) and are not associated with excess mortality when identified incidentally in clinically unselected adult individuals. Here, we provide guidance based on multidisciplinary expert consensus opinion for the reporting and subsequent clinical surveillance and management of patients with incidentally discovered RET gene variants in the UK.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

'Truthsets' for clinical validation of large-scale functional assays: Practice recommendations from Cancer Variant Interpretation Group UK (CanVIG-UK).

BACKGROUND: Large-scale functional assays, including multiplex assays of variant effect, have substantial potential to resolve variants of uncertain significance (VUS), particularly for rare missense variants where clinical and population evidence are limited. The ClinGen assay-level clinical validation framework described by Brnich et al provided baseline guidance for the use of functional data for variant classification. However, clear consensus regarding construction of variant 'truthsets' by which to clinically validate functional data remains lacking. METHODS: CanVIG-UK developed consensus recommendations for truthset construction through an iterative national consultation process involving the CanVIG Steering Advisory Group (CStAG), wider CanVIG-UK membership, and engagement with international functional genomics experts. Consultation was based on previous analyses of 2,120 truthset constructions examining the impact of truthset composition on evidence point allocation within the ClinGen assay-level clinical validation framework. RESULTS: Across several consultations, CanVIG-UK established nine guiding principles and seven best-practice recommendations for assay-level clinical validation, using the assumed context of an assay for a cancer susceptibility gene where loss-of-function is the mechanism of pathogenicity. The principal recommendation stipulates, where assays are intended for use in interpretation of largely missense variants, the truthset used to validate should comprise only missense variants. Rather than mixtures of different variant types which may serve to over-estimate assay performance. Additional recommendations support option for relaxation of truthset stringency to improve power, augmentation of benign missense truthsets with systematically derived 'proxy-clinical' benign variants, independent clinical validation separate from assayist-defined validation, and careful evaluation of missense score distributions against that of protein-truncating and synonymous variants. Guidance is also provided for scenarios with limited pathogenic truthset availability and for assays reporting multiple deleterious zones or readouts. CONCLUSIONS: The CanVIG-UK principles and recommendations for truthset construction upon the ClinGen assay-level clinical validation framework, while aiming to form a baseline for future discussion regarding other functional and disease contexts and helping to address the gap between publication of new data and routine clinical implementation.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2025

Quantifying evidence for phenotypic specificity (PP4) for syndromic phenotypes: Large-scale integration of rare germline FH variants from diagnostic laboratory testing for HLRCC and renal cancer.

PURPOSE: Hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer (HLRCC) is a rare cancer susceptibility syndrome exclusively attributable to pathogenic variants in FH (HGNC:3700). This article quantitatively weights the phenotypic context (PP4/PS4) of such very rare variants in FH. METHODS: We collated clinical diagnostic testing data on germline FH variants from 387 individuals with HLRCC and 1780 individuals with renal cancer and compared the frequency of "very-rare" variants in each phenotypic cohort with 562,295 population controls. We generated pan-gene very rare variant likelihood ratios (PG-VRV-LRs), domain-specific likelihood ratios for missense variants (DS-VRMV-LR) using spatial clustering analysis, and log2.08 likelihood ratios (LLRs) as applicable within the updated American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology variant classification framework. RESULTS: For HLRCC, the PG-VRV-LR was estimated to be 2669.4 (95% CI 1843.4-3881.2, LLR 10.77) for truncating variants and 214.7 (95% CI 185.0-246.9, LLR 7.33) for missense variants. For renal cancer, the PG-VRV-LR was 95.5 (95% CI 48.9-183.0, LLR 6.23) for truncating variants and 5.8 (95% CI 3.5-9.3, LLR 2.39) for missense variants. Clustering analysis in HLRCC cases revealed 3 "hotspot" regions wherein the DS-VRMV-LR increased to 1226.9. CONCLUSION: These data provide quantitative measures for very rare missense and truncating variants in FH, which reflect the differing phenotypic specificity of HLRCC and renal cancer and may be applicable in clinical variant classification.

Humans↗