Biomedical subjects

Kazuhiro Shimamoto

Publications and source records attributed to Kazuhiro Shimamoto.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Influence of monitor luminance and room illumination on soft-copy reading evaluation with electronically generated contrast-detail phantom: comparison of cathode-ray tube monitor with liquid crystal display.

The influence of monitor brightness and room illumination on soft-copy diagnosis by both cathode-ray tube (CRT) monitor and liquid crystal display (LCD) was evaluated and compared using a contrast-detail phantom. Nine observers (7 radiologists and 2 radiological technicians) interpreted six types of electronically generated contrast-detail phantom images using a 21-inch CRT (2,048x2,560) and a 21-inch LCD (2,048x2,560) under 6 kinds of viewing conditions, i.e. monitor brightness of 330 cd/m2 or 450 cd/m2, and room illumination of 20, 100 or 420 lux at the center of the display. Observers were requested to determine the visible borderline of the objects. Between 330 cd/m2 and 450 cd/m2, no significant difference in the visible area was found under any of the three lighting conditions. However, in two low-contrast phantom images, the visible area on the LCD was significantly larger than that on the CRT, independent of both monitor brightness and room illumination. (p<0.05). The effect of room illumination was not significant, suggesting that the use of LCD at high room illumination is acceptable.

Computers↗

PubMed2006

Intra- and interobserver agreement and performance score of breast phantom image interpretation: influence of ambient room lighting levels.

The influence of ambient room lighting conditions on soft-copy breast phantom image interpretation was evaluated by comparing cathode ray tube (CRT) monitors with liquid crystal displays (LCDs). Nine observers were asked to use a three-point scale to rate the visibility of various phantom objects (masses, specks, and fibers) displayed on a 21-inch CRT (2,560 x 2,048) and a 21-inch LCD (2,560 x 2,048) under three different levels of ambient lighting (20, 100 and 420 lux at the display center). Each phantom image was interpreted twice, and the reproducibility of judgment and inter-observer agreement was evaluated using kappa statistics. Except for the "mass" score, the LCD score showed a significantly higher value (p<0.05) compared with that of CRT. Nevertheless, no significant differences were found among the three lighting levels. Furthermore, intra- and inter-observer agreement in judgments showed no effects of room illumination. Although the breast phantom objects were better visualized on LCDs than on CRT monitors, room illumination did not affect the performance score of soft-copy reading.

Breast Neoplasms↗

PubMed2005

Effects of monitor luminance change on observer detection performance.

To confirm that the dimming luminance change in the CRT monitor will have a detrimental effect on diagnostic performance, we performed the four-alternative forced choice experiments on the CRT monitor with the 11 luminance conditions simulating CRT degraded by long-term usage. Six radiologists and one pulmonary physician performed a detection task for 11,000 test areas on 110 test images. The 11 monitor conditions significantly affected the correct detection rates of simulated nodules in the four-alternative forced choice experiments. The gradual deterioration in CRT monitor luminance will have certainly a detrimental effect on detection performance.

Computer Terminals↗

PubMed2003

Influence of monitor luminance change on observer performance for detection of abnormalities depicted on chest radiographs.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To investigate how changes in luminance affect the detection accuracy of radiologists viewing chest radiograph images on high-resolution CRT monitors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen radiologists performed a detection task for 11 chest radiograph images with simulated nodules on a monitor with 11 luminance conditions (the maximum luminance ranges from 157.4-369.0 candela/m2) simulating CRT degraded by long-term usage, under the ambient illumination of 200 lux; the observation order was always from the darkest to the brightest. RESULTS: There was a statistically reliable effect of the 11 monitor display conditions on the detection of nodules (P < 0.001). In the conditions in which the maximum luminance of the CRT was 60.7% or below that of the standard display luminance, the correctly detected nodule number reliably deteriorated. CONCLUSIONS: The luminance change in CRT monitor display under long-term usage will have a detrimental effect on nodule detection performance in chest radiograph images.

Data Display↗

PubMed2002

Interobserver agreement and performance score comparison in quality control using a breast phantom: screen-film mammography vs computed radiography.

Our objective was to evaluate interobserver agreement and to compare the performance score in quality control of screen-film mammography and computed radiography (CR) using a breast phantom. Eleven radiologists interpreted a breast phantom image (CIRS model X) by four viewing methods: (a) original screen-film; (b) soft-copy reading of the digitized film image; (c) hard-copy reading of CR using an imaging plate; and (d) soft-copy reading of CR. For the soft-copy reading, a 17-in. CRT monitor (1024x1536x8 bits) was used. The phantom image was evaluated using a scoring system outlined in the instruction manual, and observers judged each object using a three-point rating scale: (a) clearly seen; (b) barely seen; and (c) not seen. For statistical analysis, the kappa statistic was employed. For "mass" depiction, interobserver agreement using CR was significantly lower than when using screen-film ( p<0.05). There was no significant difference in the kappa value for detecting "microcalcification"; however, the performance score of "microcalcification" on CR hard-copy was significantly lower than on the other three viewing methods ( p<0.05). Viewing methods (film or CR, soft-copy or hard-copy) could affect how the phantom image is judged. Paying special attention to viewing conditions is recommended for quality control of CR mammograms.

Female↗

PubMed2002

Statistical method in a comparative study in which the standard treatment is superior to others.

The statistical method in a comparative study in which the standard treatment is theoretically or practically superior to the others has been investigated for a matched-pairs design. We derived this statistical method from one based on the maximum likelihood and score methods. Here we have shown that the score test statistic is algebraically the same as the statistic from the maximum likelihood method. As an example of our method's applications, we have considered a study on the detection of nodules on chest X-ray images displayed on a CRT with low luminance.

Biometry↗

PubMedDate not supplied

CRT diagnosis of pulmonary disease: influence of monitor brightness and room illuminance on observer performance.

Using a 21-in. cathode ray tube (CRT) monitor (2048 x 2560 x 8bits), six radiologists interpreted 12 images with interstitial lung disease under six conditions of CRT luminance (50 and 400 cd/m(2)) and room illuminance (20, 120 and 480lx), and 10 radiologists interpreted 25 images with pulmonary nodules under nine conditions of CRT luminance (50, 200 and 500 cd/m(2)) and room illuminance (20, 120 and 480lx). Observer's performance for interstitial disease was relatively better at 120lx. Four hundred and eighty lux illuminance with 50 cd/m(2) CRT luminance, which degraded the detectability of pulmonary nodule significantly (p<0.05), should be avoided for clinical use.

Data Display↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Multi-slice CT of thyroid nodules: comparison with ultrasonography.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the usefulness of multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) in comparison with ultrasonography (US) for the differentiation of benign from malignant thyroid nodules and the evaluation of tumor extension. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with thyroid nodules (14 malignant, 16 benign) who underwent both MSCT and US participated in the present study. MSCT with contrast enhancement was performed, and 3D shaded volume rendering (SVR) and multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) were employed to differentiate benign from malignant nodules and to evaluate tumor extension. US images were obtained using a 7.5 MHz annular array probe. A three-point rating scale was used for image interpretation, and the kappa statistic was employed to evaluate agreement between MSCT and US. RESULTS: Sensitivity in differentiating benign from malignant nodules was found to be 85.7% for US and 78.6% for MSCT. Disagreement between MSCT and US occurred in assessing the homogeneity of the solid component and the presence of fibrous capsule. In two of seven T4 cases, MPR provided a more accurate diagnosis than US examination in detecting extracapsular invasion. CONCLUSION: For differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules, US was found to be better than MSCT. However, MSCT could be useful for the evaluation of advanced cases with suspicion of extracapsular extension.

Diagnosis, Differential↗