Biomedical subjects

Keith A Hurvitz

Publications and source records attributed to Keith A Hurvitz.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Current options in head and neck reconstruction.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand current trends in the treatment of head and neck cancer. 2. Discuss the challenges of reconstructing head and neck defects 3. Understand the different reconstructive options available for specific anatomical regions of the head and neck. BACKGROUND: Reconstructive surgery of the head and neck is both technically challenging and rewarding. In the past 20 years, significant advances in this field have improved surgical outcomes and patient function. The development and subsequent refinement of microvascular techniques, in particular, have been a major reason for this progression. METHODS: In this article, the authors review the current options available in head and neck reconstruction. Because a large number of major craniocervicofacial defects result from oncologic resection, the authors have focused their review on this particular subject. By dividing their discussion into different anatomical sites, the authors hope to cover all major aspects of this broad topic. RESULTS: Free tissue transfer has revolutionized head and neck reconstruction. The most widely used free flaps include the fibula, radial forearm, anterolateral thigh, and rectus abdominis. Restoration of both form and function is the ultimate goal. CONCLUSIONS: Although defects of the head and neck region present a challenge, successful cosmetic and functional results have been achieved with both local and free tissue flaps. The flexibility of free tissue transfer, however, has dominated this area and continues to be the method of choice for reconstruction of sizable defects.

Forecasting↗

PubMed2005

Pediatric cervicofacial tissue expansion.

INTRODUCTION: Tissue expanders have long been used for reconstructing large cutaneous and fascio-cutaneous defects in children. Previous studies have examined tissue expansion for all body regions, touching upon the head and neck regions. We present a focused review of our experience with cervicofacial tissue expansion in the pediatric population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 89 children who underwent tissue expansion of the head and neck regions at Children's Hospital of Los Angeles. Most patients underwent multiple expander placements bringing the total expander number to 182. Indications for expansion included congenital nevus [N=39], burn scar [N=14], hemangioma/lymphangioma/arteriovenous malformation [N=11], scar due to trauma [N=10], congenital anomaly [N=5], sebaceous nevus [N=3], cutis aplasia [N=2], tumor [N=2], infection [N=2] and scleroderma [N=1]. RESULTS: Of the 182 expanders placed, 56 had an associated complication (30.8%). The most frequent complications included exposure, infection, leakage, migration, flap necrosis, wound separation, and skull bone remodeling. Expanders placed in the neck appeared to have the highest complication rate. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective review identified a high complication rate in pediatric cervicofacial tissue expansion, which is similar to previously published studies. Despite these findings, tissue expansion in pediatric patients should continue to remain a viable reconstructive option, however, proper patient selection; patient education and informed consent involving a discussion of the expected treatment course and risk profile should be undertaken.

Burns↗