PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Keith J Mueller

Publications and source records attributed to Keith J Mueller.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Medicare physician payments: impacts of changes on rural physicians.

Medicare payment disproportionately impacts rural physicians compared to urban. For example, 51% of rural physicians, compared to 44% of urban physicians, receive at least 38% of their payments from Medicare.1 Thus, the Medicare physician payment system is of significant rural interest. In this policy brief, we present the effects of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act (MMA) of 2003 on physician payment rates in rural areas. Specifically, we examine the impact of creating a floor of 1.00 in the geographic practice cost index (GPCI) for work expense. We also show the effects of the Medicare incentive payment (MIP) for providing services in shortage areas and of the bonus for practicing in a physician scarcity area. Our principal findings are the following: (1) Increases to the GPCI for work expense accounted for a substantial percentage of the two-year increases in total payment to physicians in rural payment areas. (2) Increases in the conversion factor (CF) (base payment) accounted for most of the increases in total payment in all but 6 of the 89 Medicare payment localities; in those 6 areas, the dominant factor was GPCI adjustment. (3) Bonus payments are a more direct means of targeting increased payments to physicians in specific areas than is a general increase in one part of the payment formula.

Humans↗

Chronic disease management systems registries in rural health care.

UNLABELLED: Health care quality is being addressed from a variety of policy perspectives. The 2001 Institute of Medicine report, Crossing the Quality Chasm, calls for sweeping action involving a five-part strategy for change in the U.S. health care system. This agenda for change includes use of evidence-based approaches to address common conditions, the majority of which are chronic. A Chronic Disease Management System (CDMS), or registry, is a tool that helps providers efficiently collect and analyze patient information to promote quality care for the rural population. CDMSs can provide a technological entry point for the impending use of Electronic Medical Records. A CDMS is a patient-centered electronic database tool that helps providers diagnose, treat, and manage chronic diseases. The purpose of this brief is to discuss the different types of CDMSs used by a sample of 14 state organizations and 19 local rural clinics in Maine, Nebraska, New Mexico, South Carolina, Washington, and Wisconsin. As part of a larger study examining the challenges and innovations in implementing disease management programs in rural areas, we conducted interviews with national, state, and local contacts. During interviews, respondents helped us understand the usefulness and functionalities of commonly used CDMSs in rural facilities. Our focus was on the use of CDMSs in the management of diabetes, a disease prevalent in rural populations. KEY FINDINGS: (1) CDMSs are readily available to rural clinics and are being implemented and maintained by clinic staff with minimal expenditures for technology. (2) Use of a standardized system in a collaborative helps provide data comparisons and share costs involved with technical assistance services across the group.

Chronic Disease↗

Medicare Part D: early findings on enrollment and choices for rural beneficiaries.

On January 1, 2006, the Medicare program began offering prescription drug coverage (Medicare Part D) to over 42 million Medicare beneficiaries. This policy brief provides a first snapshot of enrollment in rural and urban areas across the United States and outlines the early findings from an analysis of plans available to rural persons under Medicare's Part D program. The data in this brief will be updated as new data are available from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Key Findings As of March 18, 2006 (date of release by CMS), (1) 59% of rural beneficiaries and 67% of urban beneficiaries have creditable drug coverage. (2) 21% of rural beneficiaries were enrolled in stand-alone prescription drug plans (PDPs), compared to 13% of urban beneficiaries. (3) 3% of rural beneficiaries were enrolled in Medicare Advantage prescription drug (MA-PD) plans, compared to 16% of urban beneficiaries. (4) In non-adjacent rural areas, 22% of rural beneficiaries were enrolled in stand-alone PDPs, and 2% were enrolled in MA-PD plans. (5) All beneficiaries, including those in rural areas, can choose a PDP option that covers 91% of the top 100 formulary drugs. (6) Average monthly premiums and other plan characteristics for MA-PD plans vary significantly across states-for example (excluding Maine), 2 premiums vary from $6 in urban New Hampshire to $53 in rural Hawaii.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.↗

The role of rural health clinics in hospitalization due to ambulatory care sensitive conditions: a study in Nebraska.

CONTEXT: Hospitalization due to ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs) is often used as an indicator for measuring access to primary care. Rural health clinics (RHCs) provide basic primary care services for rural residents in health professional shortage areas (HPSAs). The relationship between RHCs and ACSCs is unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between the presence of RHCs in rural HPSAs and the likelihood of having an acute or chronic ACSC as the reason for hospitalization. METHODS: Nebraska hospital discharge data (1999-2001) and the 2003 Area Resource File were used in this analysis. A multilevel logistic regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between the presence of RHCs in rural HPSAs and the likelihood of having an ACSC as the reason for hospitalization, after controlling for individual characteristics and county-level contextual factors stratified by 3 age groups. The eligibility for logistic regression was limited to patients from 28 rural Nebraska counties designated as HPSAs in 2001. Patients with commercial payers were excluded from the study. FINDINGS: Elderly patients residing in rural Nebraska HPSAs with at least one RHC were significantly less likely to have a hospitalization due to chronic ACSCs. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of RHC is a significant factor associated with fewer hospitalizations for chronic ACSCs among the rural elderly residing in HPSAs.

Adult↗

Differences in beneficiary assessments of health care between TRICARE prime and TRICARE prime remote.

OBJECTIVES: We examined differences in health care ratings and reported health care experiences for active duty uniform services personnel using health care plans other than military treatment facilities. METHODS: We used a cross-sectional mail survey of a stratified sample of 3,871 beneficiaries enrolled in TRICARE Prime (TP) and TRICARE Prime Remote (TPR). The adjusted plan mean composite and global ratings were compared between TP and TPR participants. RESULTS: There were few significant differences between the two groups. Patient satisfaction was higher when patients chose their providers (TPR), and use of some preventive services was higher in managed-care plans (TP). Respondents in metropolitan locations differed significantly from those in nonmetropolitan locations in ratings of plans, quality of health care received, and access to services. CONCLUSIONS: The military health system is achieving some success in delivering uniform benefits but faces challenges in delivering high-quality uniform benefits in rural communities.

Adolescent↗

Assessing the financial effect of Medicare payment on rural hospitals: does the source of data change the results?

In this policy brief, we explore how predictions of changes in hospital financial performance as a result of change in Medicare payment differ when comparing results using data from the Medicare Cost Report (MCR) to results using data from the audited hospital financial statement (FS). The purpose of this exploratory research is to test the assumption that MCR data yield a valid indicator of changes in hospital financial well-being.

Data Collection↗

The Federal Employees Health Benefits Program: a model for competition in rural America?

CONTEXT: The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA) created the Medicare Advantage (MA) program, which promotes the entry of private Preferred Provider Organization (PPO) plans into regions that have not previously had Medicare managed care plans. The assumption that a competitive environment will develop is based on experiences in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP). PURPOSE: The authors test the hypothesis that the FEHBP has fostered an environment of competing health plans, especially preferred provider organizations (PPOs), in rural areas. METHODS: Data from the US Office of Personnel Management are used to quantify the number of FEHBP-certified plans in each US county and the number of enrollees in each plan. Data from the Area Resource File are used to measure independent variables in multivariate analysis to account for the number of FEHBP-certified health plans competing in each US county. FINDINGS: While 98% of all counties have at least 3 plans with enrollment, in many sparsely populated rural areas, only 1 of the plans is an open-enrollment plan (excludes plans for letter carriers). There is a strong relationship between the number of FEHBP plans and areas with high population counts and high population density. In many counties with low population counts (under 3,000), most PPOs are not contracting with the nearest primary care provider. CONCLUSIONS: The FEHBP is not a perfect predictor of MA plan activity because the MA program does not use the FEHBP approach of certifying regional plans that must offer local access. However, the FEHBP experience indicates that plans are attracted to areas with high population counts and high population density.

Economic Competition↗

Understanding the impacts of the Medicare Modernization Act: concerns of congressional staff.

Sweeping changes to the Medicare program embodied in the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA), including a new prescription drug benefit, changes in payment policies, and reform of the Medicare managed-care program, have major implications for rural health care. The most efficient mechanism for research to affect policy is to provide policy makers with information on issues about which they have voiced concern. The Rural Policy Research Institute's Health Panel conducted 2 focus groups with 16 congressional staff in September 2004 to identify a set of researchable questions concerning the impact of the MMA on rural health care. This paper presents research questions in the following areas that staff identified as having the highest priority: access to health plans and pharmacy services, beneficiary outreach and enrollment, technology capacity, provider payment policy, and demonstration projects.

Aged↗

Rural physicians' acceptance of new Medicare patients.

According to the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP), the percentage of family physicians accepting new Medicare patients declined from 84.1% in 2000 to 76.1% in 2003 (Trude & Ginsburg 2002). That decline coincided with projected annual decreases in Medicare physician payment announced in March 2002 and March 2003. The decline in the percentage of family physicians accepting new Medicare patients is cause for concern about Medicare beneficiaries' access to health care services. National trends for all physicians may mask different trends among rural physicians. The data in this policy brief describe the trends for urban and rural physicians who no longer accept new Medicare patients.

Forecasting↗

An analysis of the agreement between financial data between the Medicare Cost Report and the audited hospital financial statement.

Very few studies have thoroughly examined the discrepancies between the financial information in the Medicare Cost Report (MCR) and that in the audited hospital financial statement (FS). Furthermore, this type of study has never been conducted for rural hospitals. In this policy brief, we present the findings from our study, which used statistical methods to examine the agreement between the MCR and the FS of a series of financial measures in rural hospitals. The results are expected to inform policy makers of the limitation inherent in using MCR data as the single source of data to examine the financial performance of rural hospitals.

Accounting↗

Translating research into practice: voluntary reporting of medication errors in critical access hospitals.

CONTEXT: Low service volume, insufficient information technology, and limited human resources are barriers to learning about and correcting system failures in small rural hospitals. PURPOSE: This paper describes the implementation of and initial findings from a voluntary medication error reporting program developed by the Nebraska Center for Rural Health Research (NCRHR) to overcome these barriers in 6 Nebraska critical access hospitals (CAHs). METHODS: Participating Nebraska CAHs mailed copies of medication error reports to the NCRHR monthly for entry into a database. Quarterly summaries enabled each CAH to compare its reports by severity, type, phase of the medication use process, contributing factors, and causes to those of its peers and MEDMARX, a national medication error reporting program. Workshops emphasized learning from the reported errors by identifying system sources of variation in medication use and initiating change to achieve best practices. FINDINGS: Similar to MEDMARX, 99% of medication errors reported by 6 Nebraska CAHs were not harmful, reported errors most often originated in the administration phase, and the most common error type was omission. The CAHs reported significantly smaller proportions of "near miss" errors and errors originating in the prescribing phase than in MEDMARX. CONCLUSIONS: By collaborating with CAHs, an academic medical center, and a national reporting program, the NCRHR is translating the Institute of Medicine's recommendation for voluntary error reporting into practices that allow CAHs to learn about and improve their medication use systems. However, limited presence of pharmacists in CAHs is a barrier to implementing double checks and learning from system failures in the medication use system.

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems↗

Rural hospital HIPAA readiness and resource needs.

PRINCIPAL FINDING: rural hospitals with fewer than 50 beds were most in need of assistance and resources to prepare for HIPAA indicating that the Small Hospital Improvement Program chose well in making HIPAA readiness one of three purposes for grants to those hospitals.

Guideline Adherence↗

A method for identifying places in rural America at risk of not being able to support adequate health services.

CONTEXT: Public policymakers and their advisers struggle with the problem of specifying criteria by which health care providers in rural areas are eligible for special consideration in payment policies and for special grant programs. A means of designating places can provide a basis for assistance and can help target public resources for any providers who deliver services in those places. PURPOSE: This paper provides the details underlying a place-based approach to identifying rural areas that are at risk for not being able to provide requisite health services. METHODS: A population size criterion is utilized first to eliminate metropolitan areas and other large agglomerations from consideration. Any territory not included in a place of 3500 or more people, including a 25-mile buffer around that place, is a priori considered to be at risk. All places, including buffers, that have populations between 3500 and 100,000 are further analyzed using population compositional data and principal components analysis. FINDINGS: In 10 states and 24 bordering states selected for developing and testing the method, there were 1907 block groups outside the boundaries of any place with a population of at least 3500. In addition, the analysis suggested that 66 out of 236 places and buffers with populations between 3500 and 100,000 also should be classified as vulnerable. CONCLUSIONS: The results are discussed in regard to how a place-based approach can advance the study of rural health needs. By focusing on the needs of the people residing in a defined area, as determined from the aggregate characteristics of the population, a model is generated that can be used to predict special circumstances confronting any service provider. The public policy implications of the findings are also considered. Special payment policies could be written on the basis of place instead of provider characteristics, and grant programs providing technical assistance could be targeted to places of greatest need.

Adult↗

Evaluation informs coalition programming for environmental tobacco smoke reduction.

The objective for this formative evaluation was to establish baseline data for informing a community coalition's strategic planning in environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) risk reduction. The coalition had chosen 3 targeted settings for ETS risk reduction: restaurants, childcare facilities, and government buildings. The evaluation methodology involved telephone interviews (restaurants, n = 805; governmental buildings, n = 258) and mailed surveys (childcare facilities, n = 1,142). Data on county residents and businesses were used for comparison purposes and were analyzed from the Nebraska Social Climate Survey (2001; n = 558). Evaluation baseline findings showed that licensed childcare facilities were more ETS knowledgeable, less ETS tolerant, and more smoke-free than restaurants. Residents were more bothered by ETS than what restaurant proprietors perceived. The majority of governmental buildings were not smoke-free. Conclusions were that community health nurse evaluators can provide coalitions with formative evaluative data to inform strategic planning and increase the likelihood of effective program interventions for community impact on ETS.

Attitude to Health↗