PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Kelly Fryer-Edwards

Publications and source records attributed to Kelly Fryer-Edwards.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2007

Incorporating principles and practical wisdom in research ethics education: a preliminary study.

PURPOSE: Researchers are faced with daily ethical decisions that are subtle and nuanced. However, research ethics training has primarily focused on formal guidelines, general ethical principles, and historically noteworthy cases of research abuse, which may not prepare researchers to respond to everyday dilemmas in research. This study characterized researchers' responses to ethical dilemmas with the goal of aligning research ethics education programs with the demands of practice. METHOD: As a preliminary study, the authors conducted 23 semistructured interviews with senior researchers and research administrators engaged in research with human subjects at the University of Washington and affiliated institutions in 2004. Transcripts were reviewed for research conflicts and strategies used to resolve conflicts identified by participants. RESULTS: Participants referenced two distinct methods of reasoning when faced with conflicts: formal guidelines and practical wisdom. Formal guidelines include established goals, boundaries, and absolutes. Practical wisdom, an Aristotelian concept involving intuitions developed through experience, facilitates responses to everyday dilemmas and new situations. Developing practical wisdom requires researchers to calibrate their own intuitions about right and wrong. Three practices were reported to contribute to this development: self-reflection, sincere skepticism, and open dialogue with colleagues. CONCLUSIONS: These reflections from the senior researchers suggest a need to expand the scope of ethics education programs to include a focus on the development of researchers' pragmatic decision making in addition to the formal rules that govern research. Further research should explore effective educational and institutional strategies that can foster researchers' development in ethical decision making and conduct.

Authorship↗
PubMed2006

Bringing ethics education to the clinical years: ward ethics sessions at the University of Washington.

PURPOSE: Although most medical schools teach medical ethics during preclinical years, incorporating these ethics into clinical training remains challenging. During clinical rotations, students' professional behaviors and attitudes are profoundly affected. This project was intended to develop an educational intervention to incorporate medical ethics training as a part of students' professional development within the context of clinical training. METHOD: "Ward Ethics" is a series of peer discussions guided by clinical faculty mentors trained in fostering issue identification and strategy development. The sessions described here were conducted during medicine and surgery rotations for third-year medical students at the University of Washington School of Medicine from 1998 to 2003. Thirty clinical faculty participated as facilitators. Written evaluations were collected from students and faculty at each session, and faculty interviews were conducted in 2001. RESULTS: The data reported are from 24 sessions and 15 faculty interviews from 1999 to 2001. The topics were consistent with prior reports of ethical issues that students encountered. Students reported a variety of learned strategies such as knowing how and when to speak up and transitioning from prioritizing evaluations to focusing on patient care, resulting in their feeling more confident. Faculty reported noticing positive results to their professional development as well. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students in the clinical years face ethically challenging situations. Some circumstances, if left unexamined, may erode students' abilities to maintain and develop appropriate professional behaviors. Students participating in this activity agreed that it served as a way to fight isolation, share stories, and exchange ideas for future problem solving.

Academic Medical Centers↗
PubMed2006

Reflective teaching practices: an approach to teaching communication skills in a small-group setting.

Small-group teaching is particularly suited for complex skills such as communication. Existing work has identified the basic elements of small-group teaching, but few descriptions of higher-order teaching practices exist in the medical literature. Thus the authors developed an empirically driven and theoretically grounded model for small-group communication-skills teaching. Between 2002 and 2005, teaching observations were collected over 100 hours of direct contact time between four expert facilitators and 120 medical oncology fellows participating in Oncotalk, a semiannual, four-day retreat focused on end-of-life communication skills. The authors conducted small-group teaching observations, semistructured interviews with faculty participants, video or audio recording with transcript review, and evaluation of results by faculty participants. Teaching skills observed during the retreats included a linked set of reflective, process-oriented teaching practices: identifying a learning edge, proposing and testing hypotheses, and calibrating learner self-assessments. Based on observations and debriefings with facilitators, the authors developed a conceptual model of teaching that illustrates an iterative loop of teaching practices aimed at enhancing learners' engagement and self-efficacy. Through longitudinal, empirical observations, this project identified a set of specific teaching skills for small-group settings with applicability to other clinical teaching settings. This study extends current theory and teaching practice prescriptions by describing specific teaching practices required for effective teaching. These reflective teaching practices, while developed for communication skills training, may be useful for teaching other challenging topics such as ethics and professionalism.

Colorado↗
PubMed2006

Professionalism in medical education: an institutional challenge.

Despite considerable attention to professionalism in medical education nationwide, the majority of attention has focused on training medical students, and less on residents and faculty. Curricular formats are often didactic, removed from the clinical setting, and frequently focus on abstract concepts. As a result of a recent curricular innovation at the University of Washington School of Medicine (UWSOM) in which role-model faculty work with medical students in teaching and modeling clinical skills and professionalism, a new professionalism curriculum was developed for preclinical medical students. Through student feedback, that curriculum has changed over time, and has become more focused on the clinical encounter. This new and evolving curriculum has raised awareness of the existence of an "ecology of professionalism." In this ecological model, changes in the understanding of and attention to professionalism at one institutional level lead to changes at other levels. At the UWSOM, heightened attention to professionalism at the medical student level led to awareness of the need for increased attention to teaching and modeling professionalism among faculty, residents, and staff. This new understanding of professionalism as an institutional responsibility has helped UWSOM teachers and administrators recognize and promote mechanisms that create a "safe" environment for fostering professionalism. In such an institutional culture, students, residents, faculty, staff, and the institution itself are all held accountable for professional behavior, and improvement must be addressed at all levels.

Education, Medical↗
PubMed2006

Beyond substituted judgment: How surrogates navigate end-of-life decision-making.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize how surrogates plan to make medical decisions for others. DESIGN: Descriptive study using semistructured qualitative interviews. SETTING: Surrogates were interviewed by telephone from their homes. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty experienced surrogate decision-makers identified to make decisions for older, chronically ill veterans. MEASUREMENTS: Surrogates were asked to describe advance care planning conversations with loved ones and how they planned to make future medical decisions. Thematic content analysis was used to identify bases for decision-making. RESULTS: Surrogates described the motivators and the content of advance care planning conversations with loved ones. Surrogates described five bases for decision-making: (1) conversations (making decisions based on their knowledge of their loved ones' preferences), (2) relying on documents (referring to their loved ones' advance care directives), (3) shared experience (believing an "inner sense" would guide decisions because of shared lived experience with loved ones), (4) surrogates' own values and preferences about life, and (5) surrogates' network (enlisting the help of others). CONCLUSION: Although ethicists and clinicians expect surrogates to use substituted judgment or patients' best interests when making decisions, these data indicate that many surrogates rely on other factors such as their own best interests or mutual interests of themselves and the patient or intend to base substituted judgments on documents with which they have little familiarity.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Theoretical foundations for interventions designed to promote informed decision making for cancer screening.

BACKGROUND: Decision aids are currently being developed and evaluated for use in cancer-screening decisional settings. PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to review and discuss the theoretical basis of interventions to promote informed decision making in cancer screening. METHODS: We reviewed interventions cited in Briss et al. and Rimer et al. to identify their theoretical basis, intervention content, measurement strategies, and outcomes. RESULTS: Few interventions had a strong, decision-oriented conceptual basis. This was apparent in their intervention content, the measurement strategy, and the choice of outcomes for the study. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that more research occur into the basis of decision making in cancer screening and that future interventions use this research to rigorously design and evaluate decision aids to help people make choices about cancer screening.

Choice Behavior↗
PubMed2004

Finding effective strategies for teaching ethics: a comparison trial of two interventions.

PURPOSE: To compare the effects of two teaching methods (written case analyses and written case analyses with group discussion) on students' recognition and assessment of common ethical dilemmas. METHOD: In 1999-2000, all third-year students at the University of Washington School of Medicine on a pediatrics clinical rotation participated in the study. Eighty students were based in Seattle and 66 were in community sites in a five-state area. All students received three scenarios with written instructions for ethical analysis, submitted written answers, and received written feedback from a single evaluator. The Seattle students also participated in an hour-long, one-time discussion group about the cases. All students submitted a final case analysis. Four components of the case analyses were evaluated: ability to identify ethical issues, see multiple viewpoints, formulate an action plan, and justify their actions. One investigator evaluated a masked subset of the case analyses from both groups to assess whether teaching method affected the students' ability to recognize and assess ethical problems. RESULTS: Forty-eight of 146 available case analysis sets (each set included three initial analyses plus one final analysis) were masked and coded. Performances on the initial analyses were similar in both groups (p >.2-.8). The discussion group had a higher absolute increase in total score (p =.017) and in ability to formulate a plan (p =.013) on the final case analysis. Performances otherwise remained largely similar. CONCLUSIONS: Students' recognition and assessment of ethical issues in pediatrics improves following a case-based exercise with structured feedback. Group discussion may optimize the learning experience and increase students' satisfaction.

Clinical Clerkship↗
PubMed2004

Diving for PERLS: working and performance portfolios for evaluation and reflection on learning.

Professional competence requires a commitment to lifelong learning, self-assessment, and excellence. Complex skills such as these require flexible and comprehensive teaching and assessment measures. We describe a combination of working and performance portfolios that both foster and evaluate the development of professional competence. We explain the conceptual and practical underpinnings that maximize the effectiveness of these tools. Drawing on experience with University of Washington residents, we identify 5 criteria that can help promote successful use of portfolios: separate working and performance functions of portfolios, developing a supportive climate, developing skills in faculty and residents, observing progress over time, and fostering mentorship opportunities.

Education, Medical↗
PubMed2003

Educating for professionalism: trainees' emotional experiences on IM and pediatrics inpatient wards.

PURPOSE: To assess day-to-day emotions and the experiences that trigger these emotions for medical trainees in hospital settings. The overarching goal was to illuminate training experiences that affect professional behaviors of physicians. METHOD: This qualitative study, conducted April-June 2000, used semistructured, open-ended interviews, observations by a non-participant, and a self-report task at two inpatient services (internal medicine and pediatrics) at different hospitals within a single academic institution in the northwestern United States. Twelve team members, including medical students, interns, residents, and attendings, were invited to participate. Ten completed all aspects of the study. Interviews were conducted before and after a one-week period of non-participant observations and self-report tasks. The authors grouped emotional experiences into "positive" or "difficult" emotions. Data were analyzed for coherent themes using grounded theory and content analysis. RESULTS: Positive emotions included gratitude, happiness, compassion, pride, and relief, and were triggered by connections with patients and colleagues, receiving recognition for one's labors, learning, being a part of modern medicine, and receiving emotional support from others. Difficult emotions included anxiety, guilt, sadness, anger, and shame and were triggered by uncertainty, powerlessness, responsibility, liability, lack of respect, and a difference in values. Tragedy and patients' suffering was the only trigger to elicit both positive (compassion) and difficult (sadness) emotions. CONCLUSION: This study identified common and important emotions experienced by medical trainees and the common triggers for these emotions. Understanding trainees' experiences of uncertainty, powerlessness, differing values, and lack of respect can guide education program designs and reforms to create an environment that fosters professional growth.

Academic Medical Centers↗
PubMed2003

Promoting reflection on professionalism: a comparison trial of educational interventions for medical students.

PURPOSE: To determine whether writing, one-on-one interviews with faculty, or a combination of these interventions effectively elicited reflection on professionalism for medical students. METHOD: The study was a randomized trial conducted in 2001 at Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, with fourth-year medical students on a four-week clinical clerkship in emergency medicine. Three interventions were evaluated: the critical incident report (CIR), the CIR followed by a one-on-one interview with a faculty member, and one-on-one interview with no CIR. Quality and quantity of professional issues raised were addressed. RESULTS: All students (n = 68) agreed to participate; 66 completed the study components. On average, the students addressed significantly more issues of professionalism in their interviews alone than in their CIRs, 15.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 18.2-13.6) and 7.15 (CI 8.88-5.40) issues respectively (p <.0001). Interviews preceded by CIRs were not significantly different from interviews with no CIR (13.5 versus 15.9 professionalism issues raised, respectively). In-depth explorations, including problem solving and projection to the future, occurred 2.59 times in interviews alone (CI 3.62-1.56) and 0.794 times in CIRs (CI 1.12-0.46) (p <.001). When analyzed as a proportion of total statements, the groups had similar ratios of in-depth statements (11.2% in CIRs and 15.7% in interviews alone). CONCLUSION: Writing did not significantly affect the quantity or quality of reflection in interviews. One-on-one interviews with a faculty mentor most effectively elicited reflection on professionalism. Future studies should examine how reflective exercises such as those evaluated can be used to promote professional development.

Adult↗