Biomedical subjects

Kelly J Cole

Publications and source records attributed to Kelly J Cole.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Age-related directional bias of fingertip force.

We studied the direction of the three-dimensional fingertip force vector in young and old adults during a simple pressing task with the index finger. Ten young and ten old subjects pressed against a force plate with their index finger and maintained target forces that ranged from 2.5 to 15 N. Subjects viewed a display of the force normal to the force plate; forces tangential to the force plate were not displayed. Young adults produced fingertip forces that were nearly perpendicular to the plate at all target forces while old adults produced fingertip forces that deviated in the proximal direction of the horizontal plane, and ulnar direction of the vertical plane. The fingertip force deviated from the onset of pressing in both groups, but in young subjects the force aligned to perpendicular within 200 ms. Additional study is required to determine if these biased force vector directions contribute to clumsiness and slowing that are characteristic of fine manipulation in old age.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Can internal models of objects be utilized for different prehension tasks?

We examined if object information obtained during one prehension task is used to produce fingertip forces for handling the same object in a different prehension task. Our observations address the task specificity of the internal models presumed to issue commands for grasping and transporting objects. Two groups participated in a 2-day experiment in which they lifted a novel object (230 g; 1.2 g/cm3). On Day One, the high force group (HFG) lifted the object by applying 10 N of grip force prior to applying vertical lift force. This disrupted the usual coordination of grip and lift forces and represented a higher grip force than necessary. The self-selected force group (SSFG) lifted the object on Day One with no instructions regarding their grip or lift forces. They first generated grip forces of 5.8 N, which decreased to 2.6 N by the 10th lift. Four hours later, they lifted the same object in the manner of the HFG. On Day Two, both groups lifted the same object "naturally and comfortably" with the opposite hand. The SSFG began Day Two using a grip force of 2.5 N, consistent with the acquisition of an accurate object representation during Day One. The HFG began Day Two using accurately scaled lift forces, but produced grip forces that virtually replicated those of the SSFG on Day One. We concur with recent suggestions that separate, independently adapted internal models produce grip and lift commands. The object representation that scaled lift force was not available to scale grip force. Furthermore, the concept of a general-purpose object representation that is available across prehension tasks was not supported.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Distributing vertical forces between the digits during gripping and lifting: the effects of rotating the hand versus rotating the object.

During pinch grip we partition the vertical tangential forces at the digits according to the friction at the grip surfaces, and the mass distribution of the object. However, we cannot predictively partition the vertical forces to adjust to new frictional conditions after viewing a 180-deg rotation of an object with different textures at each grip surface. Hence, the processes that lead to predictive force partitioning may not access object representations, thereby suggesting that these processes are digit-specific. If this is true, then we should fail to predictively partition our fingertip forces when we rotate our hand. We tested this prediction by comparing the effects of object rotation with hand rotation for repeated lifts of an object that had one slippery grip surface and one rough grip surface. Subjects did not predictively redistribute the vertical tangential forces upon grasping the rotated object. Following object rotation, the vertical tangential force trajectories during the first 100 ms after contact indicated that 12/15 subjects failed to anticipate the reversed digit-friction relationships. All subjects appropriately partitioned the vertical tangential forces between the digits by the second lift after object rotation, confirming previous reports that sensory signals update the memory associated with lifting the object. In contrast, after hand rotation, 13/15 subjects anticipated the new digit-friction relationships and upon grasping the object immediately generated a steep rise in the vertical force trajectory at the rough surface. They also delayed the initial rise in vertical tangential force at the digit encountering the low-friction surface by approximately 65 ms. Thus, anticipatory partitioning of vertical fingertip forces is not strictly digit-specific. Internally driven motor plans can access the relevant memories or internal models for predictively partitioning the vertical tangential forces. It is not clear if this process involves rotating internal representations of fingertip force directly, or if the forces are derived after internally rotating a representation of the object. In contrast to the robust effects of vision on reach kinematics, or on wrist and finger configuration, visual signals about object rotation and orientation apparently do not influence vertical tangential fingertip forces.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Sensorimotor memory for fingertip forces: evidence for a task-independent motor memory.

When repetitively lifting an object with randomly varying mechanical properties, the fingertip forces reflect the previous lift. We examined the specificity of this "sensorimotor memory" by observing the effects of an isolated pinch on the subsequent lift of a known object. In this case, the pinch force was unrelated to the fingertip forces necessary to grip the object efficiently. The peak grip force used to lift the test object (4 N weight) depended on the preceding task. Compared with repetitively lifting the 4 N test object, the peak grip force was 2 N greater when a lift of the same object was preceded by a lift in which a hidden mass was attached to the object to increase the weight to 8 N. This 2 N increase in grip force also occurred when subjects lifted the 4 N test object after pinching a force transducer with a force of 8 N. Thus, similar grip forces were stored in sensorimotor memory for both tasks, and reflected subjects' use of 7.9 +/- 1.1 N to lift the 8 N object. Similar effects occurred when the preceding pinch or lift was performed with the opposite hand. The peak lift force was unaffected by the isolated pinch, suggesting that a generalized increase in fingertip and limb forces did not occur. We conclude that the sensorimotor memory is not specific for lifting an object. It is doubtful that this particular memory stores the physical properties of objects or reflects a forward internal model for predictively controlling fingertip forces.

Acceleration↗

PubMed2002

The effects of graded compression of the median nerve in the carpal canal on grip force.

The relationship between tactile hypoesthesia and precision grip force was examined using compression of the median nerve in healthy adults. Hypoesthesia was graded by varying the pressure that an external clamp exerted over the carpal canal. Electrical stimulation of the median nerve in the forearm evoked a compound sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) that we recorded from the digital nerves of the index finger. Clamp pressure was varied to achieve SNAPs that were 75%, 50%, and 25% of precompression amplitude (100%). Grip force and tactile sensibility (Semmes-Weinstein filaments, cotton wisps, sharp/dull) did not change in parallel with reductions of the SNAP. Subjects reported paresthesias at the thumb and index finger at 75% SNAP. Tactile pressure thresholds increased to the clinical range of 'diminished light touch', but subjects detected cotton wisps stroked along the finger. At 75% SNAP grip force did not change compared to 100% SNAP. Simple prehension can proceed efficiently despite these modest reductions in tactile signals. At 50% SNAP the digits remained sensate, but were reported to feel "thick, like cardboard". No subject could detect cotton wisps and tactile thresholds increased by one filament. Sharp/dull distinctions remained. Grip force increased by 55% compared to grip force at SNAPs of 100% and 75%. There were no changes in skin slipperiness, so the increased grip force represented elevated 'safety margin' (grip force exceeding that needed to prevent slip). At 25% SNAP subjects described the skin innervated by the median nerve as feeling "numb", but grip force increased little compared to 50% SNAP. Grip force continued to reflect changes in grip surface friction, and mechanical transients from setting the object on the table triggered coordinated reductions in grip force. We suspect that the loss of information from SA I and FA I, but not FA II, tactile afferents provoked the increased grip force.

Action Potentials↗

PubMed2002

Old age impairs the use of arbitrary visual cues for predictive control of fingertip forces during grasp.

Old age impairs the ability to form new associations for declarative memory, but the ability to acquire and retain procedural memories remains relatively intact. Thus, it is unclear whether old age affects the ability to learn the visuomotor associations needed to set efficient fingertip forces for handling familiar objects. We studied the ability for human subjects to use visual cues (color) about the mechanical properties (texture or weight) of a grasped object to control fingertip forces during prehension. Old and young adults (mean age 77 years and 22 years, respectively) grasped and lifted an object that varied in texture at the gripped surfaces (experiment 1: sandpaper versus acetate surface materials) or weight (experiment 2: 200 g versus 400 g). The object was color-coded according to the mechanical property in the "visual cue" condition, and the mechanical property varied unpredictably across lifts in the "no visual cue" condition. In experiment 1 (texture), the young adults' grip force (force normal to the gripped surface) when the object lifted from the support surface was 24% smaller when the surfaces were color-coded. The old adults' grip force did not vary between the visual conditions despite their accurate reports of the grip surface colors prior to each lift. Comparable findings were obtained in experiment 2, when object weight was varied and peak grip force rate prior to object lift-off was measured. Furthermore old and young subjects alike used about 2 N of grip force when lifting the 200 g object in experiment 2. Therefore, the old adults' failure to adjust grip force when the color cue was present cannot be attributed to a general inability or unwillingness to use low grip force when handling objects. We conclude that old age affects the associative learning that links visual identification of an object with the fingertip forces for efficiently handling the object. In contrast, old and young subjects' grip force was influenced by the preceding lift, regardless of visual cues, which supports existing theories that multiple internal representations govern predictive control of fingertip forces during prehension.

Adult↗