Biomedical subjects

Ken Muneoka

Publications and source records attributed to Ken Muneoka.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Limb regeneration in higher vertebrates: developing a roadmap.

We review what is known about amphibian limb regeneration from the prospective of developing strategies for the induction of regeneration in adult mammals. Prominent in urodele amphibian limb regeneration is the formation of a blastema of undifferentiated cells that goes on to reform the limb. The blastema shares many properties with the developing limb bud; thus, the outgrowth phase of regeneration can be thought of as cells going through development again, i.e., redevelopment. Getting to a redevelopment phase in mammals would be a major breakthrough given our extensive understanding of limb development. The formation of the blastema itself represents a transition phase in which limb cells respond to injury by dedifferentiating to become embryonic limb progenitor cells that can undergo redevelopment. During this phase, rapid wound closure is followed by the dedifferentiation of limb cells to form the blastema. Thus, the regeneration process can be divided into a wound-healing/dedifferentiation phase and a redevelopment phase, and we propose that the interface between the wound-healing response and gaining access to developmentally regulated programs (dedifferentiation) lies at the heart of the regeneration problem in mammals. In urodele amphibians, dedifferentiation can occur in all of the tissues of the limb; however, numerous studies lead us to focus on the epidermis, the dermis, and muscle as key regulators of regeneration. Among higher vertebrates, the digit tip in mammals, including humans, is regeneration-competent and offers a unique mammalian model for regeneration. Recent genetic studies in mice identify the Msx1 gene as playing a critical role in the injury response leading to digit tip regeneration. The results from regeneration studies ranging from amphibians to mammals can be integrated to develop a roadmap for mammalian regeneration that has as its focus understanding the phenomenon of dedifferentiation.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Digit regeneration is regulated by Msx1 and BMP4 in fetal mice.

The regeneration of digit tips in mammals, including humans and rodents, represents a model for organ regeneration in higher vertebrates. We had previously characterized digit tip regeneration during fetal and neonatal stages of digit formation in the mouse and found that regenerative capability correlated with the expression domain of the Msx1 gene. Using the stage 11 (E14.5) digit, we now show that digit tip regeneration occurs in organ culture and that Msx1, but not Msx2, mutant mice display a regeneration defect. Associated with this phenotype, we find that Bmp4 expression is downregulated in the Msx1 mutant digit and that mutant digit regeneration can be rescued in a dose-dependent manner by treatment with exogenous BMP4. Studies with the BMP-binding protein noggin show that wild-type digit regeneration is inhibited without inhibiting the expression of Msx1, Msx2 or Bmp4. These data identify a signaling pathway essential for digit regeneration, in which Msx1 functions to regulate BMP4 production. We also provide evidence that endogenous Bmp4 expression is regulated by the combined activity of Msx1 and Msx2 in the forming digit tip; however, we discovered a compensatory Msx2 response that involves an expansion into the wild-type Msx1 domain. Thus, although both Msx1 and Msx2 function to regulate Bmp4 expression in the digit tip, the data are not consistent with a model in which Msx1 and Msx2 serve completely redundant functions in the regeneration response. These studies provide the first functional analysis of mammalian fetal digit regeneration and identify a new function for Msx1 and BMP4 as regulators of the regenerative response.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Differential cell affinity and sorting of anterior and posterior cells during outgrowth of recombinant avian limb buds.

To examine the role of position-specific differences in cell-cell affinity, recombinant limb buds composed of dissociated and reaggregated cells derived from anterior (A) and posterior (P) limb bud fragments were analyzed. Dissociated anterior and/or posterior cells were differentially labeled, and their behavior was analyzed during recombinant limb bud outgrowth. We find that anterior and posterior cells sort out from one another to form alternating anterior and posterior stripes of cells that extend distally along the proximal-distal axis. These alternating stripes are prominent across the A/P axis in whole-mount preparations of recombinant limb buds after 48 h of outgrowth when the presumptive autopod is dorsal-ventrally flattened and digit rudiments are not evident. After 96 h, when digital and interdigital regions are clearly defined, we find evidence that A/P stripes do not follow obvious anatomical boundaries. The formation of A/P stripes is not inhibited by grafts of ZPA tissue, suggesting that polarizing activity does not influence cell-cell affinity early in limb outgrowth. In vitro studies provide evidence that cell sorting is not dependent on the limb bud ectoderm or the AER; however, cells sort out without organizing into stripes. Gene expression studies using anterior-specific (Alx-4) and posterior-specific (Shh, Bmp-2, and Hoxd-13) marker genes failed to reveal expression domains that corresponded to stripe formation. Control recombinant limb buds composed of anterior, central, or posterior mesenchyme formed digits in a position-specific manner. A/P recombinant limb buds that develop to later stages form digits that are characteristic of central recombinant limbs. These data provide the first definitive evidence of A/P cell sorting during limb outgrowth in vivo and suggest that differential cell affinities play a role in modulating cell behavior during distal outgrowth.

Animals↗