Biomedical subjects

Ken Sakumoto

Publications and source records attributed to Ken Sakumoto.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Sedation-free colonoscopy.

PURPOSE: The administration of sedative drugs at colonoscopy has its drawbacks, such as increasing the rate of complications and the cost. There are a number of potential advantages to performing colonoscopy without sedation. The aim of this study is to evaluate patient tolerance and acceptance during sedation-free colonoscopy. METHODS: Pain during sedation-free colonoscopy was evaluated in consecutive series of 675 patients in a prospective manner from January 1, 2003, to February 18, 2004. We recorded the degree of patient pain during colonoscopy, willingness to undergo sedation-free colonoscopy in the future, the complication rate, and the intubation time. The assisting endoscopy nurses and patients independently assessed the pain level immediately after the procedure using a four-point pain scale (nil, mild, moderate, severe). RESULTS: Almost all colonoscopies (99.6 percent: 672/675) were successful. There were four complications related to colonoscopy (bleeding after polypectomy). Patients and nurses rated pain by a four-point pain scale as follows. For the patients: nil, 69.6 percent (470/675); mild, 28.0 percent (189/675); moderate, 2.2 percent (15/675); severe, 0.1 percent (1/675). For the nurses: nil, 76.1 percent (514/675); mild, 22.7 percent (153/675); moderate, 0.9 percent (6/ 675); severe, 0.3 percent (2/675). Patients rarely suffered from severe pain during carefully performed colonoscopies. The pain level of almost all colonoscopies was acceptable by patients, with only six patients (1.0 percent) stating that they would never undergo a colonoscopy without sedation in the future because of unbearable pain. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that carefully performed sedation-free colonoscopy rarely causes complications and is well accepted by most patients. Sedation-free colonoscopy is more cost-effective, may be safer, and should be offered as an alternative to colonoscopy with sedation.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Prospective evaluation of factors predicting difficulty and pain during sedation-free colonoscopy.

PURPOSE: Colonoscopy can be painful for patients and difficult for colonoscopists; however, it is hard to predict how painful or difficult the examination will be. This study was designed to identify factors that predict pain and difficulty during sedation-free colonoscopy. METHODS: A total of 848 consecutive sedation-free colonoscopies were evaluated in a prospective manner. Factors were recorded, including patient pain, intubation time, demographic data, history of abdominal surgery, bowel preparation status, diverticular disease, bowel habits, anxiety level, and number of previous colonoscopies. These factors were analyzed to determine their association with pain and difficulty. RESULTS: Almost all colonoscopies (845/848; 99.6 percent) were successful. Univariate analyses showed that lower body mass index, younger age, female gender, anxiety level, first time, intubation time, preparation status, previous hysterectomy, and previous gynecologic surgery were predictors of patient pain, and lower body mass index, female gender, anxiety level, preparation status, previous hysterectomy, previous gynecologic surgery, and constipation were predictors of difficulty of intubation. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that lower body mass index, younger age, intubation time, preparation status, previous hysterectomy, and antispasmodic agent use were predictors of patient pain, and lower body mass index, female gender, constipation, preparation status, and previous hysterectomy were predictors of difficulty of intubation. CONCLUSIONS: By use of intubation time and patient pain, several patient characteristics were identified that may predict technical difficulty and pain associated with the procedure. These findings have implications for the practice and teaching of colonoscopy.

Adolescent↗