PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Kenneth Angermeier

Publications and source records attributed to Kenneth Angermeier.

9 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

A randomized controlled trial comparing simultaneous intra-operative vs sequential prophylactic ureteric catheter insertion in re-operative and complicated colorectal surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Prophylactic insertion of ureteric stents aids intra-operative identification of ureters and may allow easier visualization of any direct ureteric injury. Traditionally, ureteric catheters are inserted sequentially, before starting the abdominal part of the operation. This study determines the safety and efficacy of simultaneous intra-operative ureteric catheter insertion during complicated and re-operative colorectal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After institutional review board (IRB) approval, 24 patients were randomized into two groups, sequential (SEQ) and simultaneous (SIM) depending upon the timing of stent placement relative to abdominal incision. Time taken from induction to abdominal incision (AIT), induction to peritoneal entry (PET), catheter insertion time (CIT), and urinary tract infection rates were recorded. Degree of difficulty for stent insertion was graded on a scale of 1-10. RESULT: Demographics were similar between groups. Mean AIT (22 +/- 4 vs 41 +/- 7; p = 0.0001) and mean PET (26 +/- 4.2 vs 44 +/- 7.6; p = 0.0001) were shorter in the SIM group. There was no significant difference in mean CIT in SIM and SEQ groups (17.9 +/- 4.9 vs 17.6 +/- 5.9 min, p = 0.8). The stents were unsuccessful bilaterally in one patient in the SEQ group and unilaterally in two other patients, one in each group. The median difficulty score for catheter insertion was 3 (1-10) and 2 (1-10), (p = 0.12), respectively, in SIM and SEQ groups. There were no ureteric injuries in either group. One patient in SIM developed a urinary tract infection. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous ureteric catheter insertion during abdominal procedures reduces operating times without a significant increase in morbidity. Furthermore, this permits a policy of selective stent insertion as required by the intra-abdominal findings after laparotomy.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Improved biochemical relapse-free survival for patients with large/wide glands treated with prostate seed implantation for localized adenocarcinoma of prostate.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze whether prostate size affects biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS). METHODS: The bRFS outcomes for 390 patients with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up were determined from a review of a prospectively maintained database. All patients were treated with iodine-125 alone as the radiotherapeutic modality and had a minimum of four posttreatment prostate-specific antigen values. None were treated with androgen deprivation. The factors examined in the univariate and multivariate analyses predicting for bRFS included gland volume, patient age, initial prostate-specific antigen value, biopsy Gleason score, clinical stage, and postimplant dosimetric variables. RESULTS: Most patients had low-risk disease, and the median follow-up was 45 months (range 24 to 102). Using the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology Oncology definition of biochemical failure, the overall 5-year bRFS rate was 89.3%. On separate multivariate analyses, only the pretreatment prostate width and volume significantly influenced bRFS favorably (P = 0.0069 and P = 0.0255, respectively). No association was found between gland size/width and postimplant dosimetry. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study have shown that implantation of large/wide prostates independently confers better bRFS.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2005

PSA kinetics after prostate brachytherapy: PSA bounce phenomenon and its implications for PSA doubling time.

PURPOSE: To analyze prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics in patients treated with prostate brachytherapy (PI) with a minimum of 5 years of PSA follow-up. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The records of 162 patients treated with PI for localized prostate cancer with a minimum of 5 years of PSA follow-up were reviewed. A variety of pretreatment and posttreatment variables were examined. Patients were coded as having a PSA bounce if their PSA achieved a nadir, elevated at least 0.2 ng/mL greater than that nadir, and decreased to, or below, the initial nadir. Two definitions of biochemical failure (bF) or biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) were used: the classic American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition of three consecutive rises (bF3) and the nadir plus 2 ng/mL definition (bFn+2). Associations between a PSA bounce and the various pre- and posttreatment factors were assessed with logistic regression analysis, and the association between a PSA bounce and bF was examined with the log-rank test. The Mann-Whitney U test was applied to test for differences in the PSA doubling time (PSADT) and the time to a PSA rise between the PSA bounce patients and the bF patients. PSADT was calculated from the nadir to the time of the first PSA rise, because this point is known first in the clinical setting. RESULTS: The 5-year overall bRFS rate was 87% for the bF3 definition and 96% for the bFn+2 definition. A PSA bounce was experienced by 75 patients (46.3%). Patients who experienced a PSA bounce were less likely to have a bF, regardless of the bRFS definition used (bF3: p=0.0015; bFn+2: p=0.0040). Among the pre- and posttreatment factors, only younger age predicted for a PSA bounce on multivariate analysis (p=0.0018). The use of androgen deprivation had no effect on PSA bounce. No difference was found in the PSADT between patients who had a PSA bounce and those with bF. The median PSADT for those with a PSA bounce was 8.3 months vs. 10.3 months using the bF3 definition and 8.8 months using the bFn+2 definition. However, a significant difference was found in the time to the first rise in PSA after PI for patients with a PSA bounce vs. patients with bF. The median time to the first rise in PSA after nadir for those with a PSA bounce was 15.1 months vs. 30.0 months using the bF3 definition (p=0.001) and 22.3 months using the bFn+2 definition (p=0.013). CONCLUSION: Patients experiencing a PSA bounce are more likely to be younger and will have a better bRFS. The PSADT cannot differentiate a PSA bounce from bF. The time to the initial PSA rise after nadir is an excellent discriminator of bF from PSA bounce. The time of the PSA rise after nadir occurs far sooner for a PSA bounce than for bF. This factor should be considered when assessing a patient with a rising PSA level after PI before a patient is administered salvage therapy.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2004

A retrospective comparison of androgen deprivation (AD) vs. no AD among low-risk and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients treated with brachytherapy, external beam radiotherapy, or radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: To examine the value of androgen deprivation (AD) in the curative treatment of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with the three major modalities: radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), and permanent prostate implantation (PI). METHODS AND MATERIALS: During 1996-2001, 1668 patients with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer were treated at The Cleveland Clinic Foundation. Only patients with a minimum of 2 years of prostate-specific antigen follow-up were included in the analysis, and biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) was used as the endpoint. Patients were grouped according to treatment modality and stratified according to the use of AD. RESULTS: The overall 5-year bRFS rate was 87.8%. The 5-year bRFS rate for low-risk patients was 89% and for intermediate-risk patients was 79%. For low-risk patients, the 5-year bRFS rates by treatment modality (without AD vs. with AD, respectively) were PI: 90% vs. 93%; EBRT: 90% vs. 93%; and RRP: 89% vs. 84%. For intermediate-risk patients, the 5-year bRFS rates by treatment modality (without AD vs. with AD, respectively) were PI: 88% vs. 82%; EBRT: 81% vs. 84%; and RRP: 75% vs. 72%. None of the comparisons within risk groups or among modalities supports an increased efficacy with the use of AD. CONCLUSION: Five-year bRFS rates in low-risk and intermediate-risk patients are not improved by the use of AD.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

PSA bounce predicts early success in patients with permanent iodine-125 prostate implant.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the clinical and dosimetric factors that predict prostate-specific antigen (PSA) bounce after iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy and to determine the predictive value of PSA bounce relative to biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS). METHODS: A multivariate analysis of factors thought to predict for PSA bounce was performed in 295 consecutive patients with T1-T2 prostate cancer treated by prostate brachytherapy as the sole radiotherapeutic modality and a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The variables examined included age, initial PSA level, biopsy Gleason score, use of androgen deprivation, occurrence of PSA bounce, dose received by 90% of the prostate gland, and volume of gland receiving 100% of the prescribed dose. A PSA bounce was defined as a rise of at least 0.2 ng/mL greater than a previous PSA level with a subsequent decline equal to, or less than, the initial nadir. A second analysis investigating the same factors and adding PSA bounce as a predictor of bRFS was also performed. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 38 months. A PSA bounce was noted in 82 (28%) of 295 patients. On multivariate analysis, only younger age (younger than 65 years) significantly predicted for a PSA bounce. Patients who experienced a PSA bounce were less likely to have biochemical failure (P = 0.037). Overall, the bRFS rate at 5 years in those experiencing a PSA bounce was 100% versus 92% in those with no bounce. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate salvage therapy in patients with a rising PSA level after permanent prostate brachytherapy should not be initiated provided the PSA increase does not exceed the pretreatment PSA value. A PSA bounce may be associated with improved bRFS but was not associated with any of the pretreatment clinical and dosimetric factors examined.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2003

Effect of anatomic, procedural, and dosimetric variables on urinary retention after permanent iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy.

OBJECTIVES: To correlate anatomic, procedural, and dosimetric parameters with the rate of intermittent self-catheterization (ISC). METHODS: The records of 402 patients with a median age of 69 years treated with 125I prostate seed implantation from 1996 to 2001 were reviewed for the use of ISC. The records were examined for the preimplant factors: prostate volume, use of androgen deprivation, and prostate length. The intraprocedural factor reviewed was the number of needles used. The following postimplant information was also collected: preimplant transrectal ultrasound-generated prostate volume/postimplant computed tomography-generated prostate volume ratio, V100, V150, V200, V300, V400, D90, and D100. Correlation was assessed using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Forty-four patients had to use ISC (10.9%). The mean and median duration of ISC was 11.9 and 6 weeks, respectively. From univariate analysis, prostate length and prostate volume were found to be statistically significant predictors of ISC after 125I prostate seed implantation with a P value of 0.0002 and 0.0042, respectively. With multivariate analysis, only prostate length was a statistically significant predictor of ISC use after 125I prostate seed implantation (P = 0.0095). CONCLUSIONS: Prostate length is an important predictor of ISC after 125I prostate seed implantation.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Long-term potency after iodine-125 radiotherapy for prostate cancer and role of sildenafil citrate.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the long-term sexual potency and attrition in sexual function after iodine-125 ((125)I) seed radiotherapy and the effect of sildenafil on radiation-induced erectile dysfunction (ED). METHODS: This prospective study consisted of 86 sexually active patients (mean age 63.5 +/- 7.7 years) who underwent (125)I seed implantation from 1997 to 1999 to treat low-volume prostate cancer (prostate-specific antigen less than 10 ng/mL, Gleason score 6 or less, stage T1-T2). All patients were followed up every 6 to 8 months for 4 years. Patients prescribed sildenafil citrate for ED completed the abridged five-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) questionnaires. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 49.7 months (range 36 to 66). Of 86 patients, 43 (50%) did not initiate drug therapy; and only 36 (83.7%) of the 43 were interviewed at 4 years. Twenty-three (63.8%) of the 36 patients had erections sufficient for vaginal penetration, with a total mean +/- SD IIEF-5 score of 15.76 +/- 1.13. The other 50% (43 of 86) initiated sildenafil citrate for treatment of ED after seed implantation, with a minimal follow-up of 6 months. At 4 years, 32 (74%) of the 43 were responding positively to sildenafil citrate, with a total IIEF-5 score of 18.3 +/- 1.2. The mean EDITS +/- SD score was 76.5 +/- 3.2, and the spousal satisfaction rate was 72% (31 of 43). The dropout rate was 37% (16 of 43); 10 (63%) of the 16 discontinued because of a lack of efficacy, 3 (19%) because of a return of natural erections sufficient for vaginal penetration, and 3 (19%) discontinued because of side effects (headaches). CONCLUSIONS: ED is a major long-term issue after (125)I seed radiotherapy, with a long-term potency rate of 29%. Sildenafil citrate improves erections in most patients after (125)I seed implantation.

Adenocarcinoma↗