Lucid dreaming during Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT).
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Kenneth F Whyte.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine the therapeutic efficacy and viability of a novel oral interface for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) compared with conventional nasal interfaces. DESIGN: A randomized single-blind crossover study. SETTING: Hospital-based sleep laboratory. PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS: 21 CPAP-naïve patients with obstructive sleep apnea (baseline apnea-hypopnea index, 85 +/- 36) INTERVENTIONS: Nasal CPAP and oral CPAP MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Patients were each treated for two 4-week periods using nasal CPAP and oral CPAP. The CPAP titrations were undertaken at the start of each treatment arm. Outcome measures were recorded at baseline and at the end of each treatment arm. These included polysomnography variables, CPAP compliance, subjective sleepiness, obstructive sleep apnea symptom ratings, and adverse effects. There were no significant differences between oral and nasal interfaces for the on-CPAP frequency of apneas and hypopneas (mean difference, nasal-oral [95%CI] = -4.6[-10.1-1.0]/h; P = 0.06) or arousals (-3.0 [-7.8-1.8]/h; P = 0.23). There were also no statistically significant differences between interfaces for scores on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (-0.7 [-3.1-1.7]; P = 0.20), obstructive sleep apnea symptoms (-7.7 [-17.7-2.4]; P = 0.052), CPAP compliance (0.3 [-0.5-1.1] h/night; P = 0.50), CPAP pressure (0.05 [-0.66-0.76] cmH20; P = 0.73), CPAP side effects scores (-2.0 [-5.3-1.4]; P = 0.23), or mask preference (P = 0.407). In addition, both nasal and oral interfaces significantly improved polysomnographic variables, Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores, obstructive sleep apnea symptoms, and CPAP compliance from baseline (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study indicates that oral CPAP has similar efficacy to traditionally applied nasal CPAP in treating obstructive sleep apnea. Additional large studies are required to determine the range of clinical situations where oral CPAP is indicated.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Home overnight pulse oximetry (OPO) is used to assess nocturnal desaturation in patients with COPD, but the current practice of relying on one recording has not been studied. We assessed the variability of nocturnal desaturation in patients with COPD between nights, as measured by home OPO. DESIGN: Study subjects attended for clinical evaluation, spirometry, and arterial blood gas analysis. OPO was prospectively completed at home on 2 consecutive nights (study night 1 [N1] and study night 2 [N2]) and repeated at 3 weeks (study night 3 [N3]). SETTING: Respiratory Services, Green Lane Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand. PATIENTS: Twenty-six patients with clinically stable COPD (mean age, 69.3 years [SD, 6.9]; FEV(1), 28.6% predicted [SD, 10.6]; PO(2), 71.3 mm Hg [SD, 9.8]). Patients with asthma or clinical evidence of obstructive sleep apnea were excluded. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Mean nocturnal saturation (MNS) and time spent with saturation below 90% (TB90%) were calculated for N1, N2, and N3. Group mean recording length, MNS, and TB90% were similar for each night. Little variation in MNS was seen between nights (N1 and N2 mean difference, 1.31%; N2 and N3, 1.26%; N1 and N3, 1.25%). Larger variation was seen between nights for TB90% (N1 and N2 mean difference, 17.46%; N2 and N3, 9.95%; N1 and N3, 14.05%). No factors were identified that predicted increased variability of TB90%. Using the current definition of "significant nocturnal desaturation" (TB90% > or = 30% of the night), 9 of 26 patients (34.6%) changed category between "desaturator" and "nondesaturator" from N1 to N2. CONCLUSION: Nocturnal desaturation in patients with COPD exhibits considerable night-to-night variability when measured by home OPO. A single home OPO recording may be insufficient for accurate assessment of nocturnal desaturation.