PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Kenneth G Brown

Publications and source records attributed to Kenneth G Brown.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Concentration-time-response modeling for acute and short-term exposures.

Risk of health effects from acute and short-term exposure depends on exposure time as well as exposure concentration. A general approach to extending a concentration-response model to include time as a variable is described using mortality of rats exposed to hydrogen sulfide (H(2)S) as an example. This particular example resulted in a logit model with concentration-time (c-t) relationship linear in time and log-concentration. It provided an improved statistical fit, based on the Akaike information criterion in the observed time range, 30 m-360 m, over implementing the c-t relationship of [ten Berge, W.F., Zwart, A., Appelman, L.M., 1986. Concentration-time mortality response relationship of irritant and systemically acting vapours and gases. J. Hazard. Mater. 13, 301--309] as a default in the logit model. This approach also indicated that there might be a fundamental difference in the relationship between concentration, time, and response at short exposure times, somewhere less than 30 m, a hypothesis for further consideration from a biological perspective. In general, the proposed approach provides flexibility to develop a concentration-time-response model, and the associated concentration-time relationship, from the data. Interpretation and potential implications, however, need to be considered within the context of biological plausibility as well. Implementation of the proposed approach requires adequate data for separate concentration-response modeling at each of several exposure durations.

Air Pollutants↗
PubMed2005

An examination of the structure and nomological network of trainee reactions: a closer look at "smile sheets".

Although D. L. Kirkpatrick (1959, 1996) popularized the concept of trainee reactions over 40 years ago, few studies have critically examined trainees' reactions to learning events. In this article, research on mood and emotion is used to develop a theoretical framework for research on trainee reactions. Two studies examine the factor structure of reactions and their nomological network. In Study 1, 178 undergraduate and 101 graduate students listened to a computer-delivered multimedia lecture. Results suggest that (a) reactions can be conceptualized as hierarchical, with overall satisfaction explaining associations among distinct reaction facets (enjoyment, relevance, and technology satisfaction), and (b) reactions are predicted by trainee characteristics. In Study 2, 97 undergraduates experienced the same lecture in 1 of 3 randomly assigned delivery technologies. Reactions were influenced by technology and were related to learning process (engagement) and outcomes (intentions regarding delivery technology, content, and learning). Both studies support the theoretical framework proposed.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Utilizing data from multiple studies (meta-analysis) to determine effective dose-duration levels. Example: rats and mice exposed to hydrogen sulfide.

The objective of this exercise was to incorporate as much data as possible from multiple studies, that may differ in exposure durations, to derive a chemical-specific dose-duration response curve from which to identify toxicity markers (e.g., ED01, benchmark dose, and LD50). This has the advantage of incorporating more information than single-study assessments to improve estimates and reduce confidence intervals, and determining toxicity markers as functions of exposure duration as well as dose. The example used mortality for rats and mice, analyzed separately, from acute exposure to hydrogen sulfide (dose refers to airborne concentration of H(2)S). Statistical methods were applied to determine when data from different studies could be pooled. EC01, EC10, and EC50 (doses with response rates of 1, 10, and 50%) were estimated, with 95% confidence intervals, at durations of 5, 10, and 30 min, and 1, 2, 4, and 6 h. A single dose-duration response curve for mortality was fit to the rat data for exposures of 5 min, 10 min, 30 min, and 1h, using a logistic curve additive in log(dose) and log(duration). Separate fits of that model were required, however, at 2, 4, and 6h, due to an increasing impact of duration relative to concentration as duration increased. The curves for rats fit the data exceedingly well and exhibited a threshold-like response followed by a steep incline as concentration increased. There were fewer data for mice but the response pattern for mortality clearly differed from rats. This example demonstrates the feasibility of extending the concept of single-study benchmark doses to multiple-study dose-duration benchmarks, using U.S. EPA's program CatReg. Similar applications to long-term animal studies could be considered.

Air Pollutants↗
PubMed2002

Arsenic, drinking water, and health: a position paper of the American Council on Science and Health.

The purpose of this American Council on Science and Health report is to review issues and sources of uncertainty affecting assessment of potential health risks related to drinking water in the United States. Some background is included on how these issues arose, as is a review of the 1999 National Research Council report (with references to an updated version), to formulate a position based on the current science concerning how much of a risk of adverse health effects actually exists from arsenic in drinking water in the United States. ACSH concludes that there is clear evidence that chronic exposure to inorganic arsenic at concentrations of at least several hundred micrograms per liter may cause: (1) cancer of skin, bladder, lung (and possibly several other internal organs, including kidney, liver, and prostate), and (2) noncancer effects, including classic cutaneous manifestations that are distinctive and characteristic of chronic arsenic poisoning (diffuse or spotted hyperpigmentation and palmar-plantar hyperkeratoses). Noncancer effects may be multisystemic, with some evidence of peripheral vascular, cardiovascular, and cerebrovascular disease, diabetes, and adverse reproductive outcomes. Further study is needed to know if beneficial effects of arsenic in animal studies apply to humans. ACSH concludes that there is little, if any, evidence of a detrimental health effect in humans from inorganic arsenic in drinking water at the current maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 50 microg/L or below, either in the United States or elsewhere. As noted in the 1999 NRC report, "No human studies of sufficient statistical power or scope have examined whether consumption of arsenic in drinking water at the current MCL results in an increased incidence of cancer or noncancer effects" (NRC, 1999, p. 7). Based on our review, described in this article, ACSH finds that the limitations of the epidemiological data available and the state-of-the-science on the mode-of-action of arsenic toxicity, including can cer, are inadequate to support the conclusion that there are adverse health effects in the United States from arsenic in drinking water at or below the limit of 50 microg/L.

Arsenic↗