PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Kenneth J Nichols

Publications and source records attributed to Kenneth J Nichols.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Comparison among tomographic radionuclide ventriculography algorithms for computing left and right ventricular normal limits.

BACKGROUND: Various algorithms have been developed to compute right ventricular (RV) and left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volumes, end-systolic volumes, and ejection fractions (EF) from tomographic radionuclide ventriculography (TRV). The aims of this investigation were to establish sex-specific normal limits, to determine whether different algorithms produce the same normal values, and to compare TRV normal limits vs for magnetic resonance imaging values in the literature. METHODS: Fifty-one healthy volunteers (29 men, 22 women) were studied prospectively. All subjects had normal electrocardiograms and echocardiographic examinations, and underwent both planar radionuclide ventriculography and TRV. Four algorithms were used to process TRV data. RESULTS: Normal limits for most functional parameters differed significantly from one algorithm to another. Volumes were greater in men, but no statistically significant differences were found between men and women for LV EF or RV EF values for any method. Normal LV and RV EF and volumes were largely consistent with the literature for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Ventricular measurements differ significantly among TRV algorithms. Therefore, it is important to apply sex-specific normal limits that are specific to a given TRV algorithm in interpreting LV and RV EF and volume measurements for each patient.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

PET with FDG-labeled leukocytes versus scintigraphy with 111In-oxine-labeled leukocytes for detection of infection.

PURPOSE: To compare prospectively the accuracy of positron emission tomography (PET) with leukocytes labeled in vitro with (18)F fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) versus that of conventional scintigraphy with leukocytes labeled in vitro with (111)In oxine in patients suspected of having infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This HIPAA-compliant study had institutional review board approval; informed consent was obtained from all patients. Patients were 25 men and 26 women aged 32-86 years. In vitro labeling of autologous human leukocytes with FDG and (111)In-oxine was performed according to published methods. Labeling efficiencies and cell viability were determined. Imaging was performed 2.5-5.8 hours after injection of 196-315 MBq of FDG-labeled leukocytes and approximately 24 hours after injection of 17-25 MBq of (111)In-oxine-labeled leukocytes. Forty-three (20 men, 23 women; mean age, 59 years; range, 32-86 years) patients could be successfully imaged with both tracers. Six patients were not injected with FDG-labeled leukocytes because of low labeling efficiency (<35%). Two patients were injected with FDG-labeled leukocytes but were not imaged. One reader interpreted all results as positive or negative for infection. Imaging results were compared with final diagnoses. Labeling efficiencies and cell viabilities were compared by using the paired t test. Differences between PET and scintigraphy were determined by using the McNemar test. RESULTS: For the 43 patients who were imaged with both tracers, labeling efficiency of FDG was lower than that of (111)In oxine (72% +/- 8 [standard deviation] vs 90% +/- 5, P < .001). Viability of FDG-labeled leukocytes was not different from that of (111)In-oxine-labeled leukocytes (98% +/- 1 vs 97% +/- 3). There were no differences between FDG PET and (111)In scintigraphy in terms of sensitivity (87% vs 73%), specificity (82% vs 86%), or accuracy (84% vs 81%). CONCLUSION: PET with FDG-labeled leukocytes was comparable to scintigraphy with (111)In-oxine-labeled leukocytes. Further investigation in a larger population with dedicated PET or PET/computed tomography seems warranted.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Diagnosing infection in the failed joint replacement: a comparison of coincidence detection 18F-FDG and 111In-labeled leukocyte/99mTc-sulfur colloid marrow imaging.

UNLABELLED: The objectives of this study were to investigate (18)F-FDG imaging, using a coincidence detection system, for diagnosing prosthetic joint infection and to compare it with combined (111)In-labeled leukocyte/(99m)Tc-sulfur colloid marrow imaging in patients with failed lower extremity joint replacements. METHODS: Fifty-nine patients--with painful, failed, lower extremity joint prostheses, 40 hip and 19 knee--who underwent (18)F-FDG, labeled leukocyte, and bone marrow imaging, and had histopathologic and microbiologic confirmation of the final diagnosis, formed the basis of this investigation. (18)F-FDG images were interpreted as positive for infection using 4 different criteria: criterion 1: any periprosthetic activity, regardless of location or intensity; criterion 2: periprosthetic activity on the (18)F-FDG image, without corresponding activity on the marrow image; criterion 3: only bone-prosthesis interface activity, regardless of intensity; criterion 4: semiquantitative analysis--a lesion-to-background ratio was generated, and the cutoff value yielding the highest accuracy for determining the presence of infection was determined. Labeled leukocyte/marrow images were interpreted as positive for infection when periprosthetic activity was present on the labeled leukocyte image without corresponding activity on the marrow image. RESULTS: Twenty-five (42%) prostheses, 14 hip and 11 knee, were infected. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of (18)F-FDG, by criterion, were as follows: criterion 1: 100%, 9%, 47%; criterion 2: 96%, 35%, 61%; criterion 3: 52%, 44%, 47%; criterion 4: 36%, 97%, 71%. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of labeled leukocyte/marrow imaging were 100%, 91%, and 95%, respectively. WBC/marrow imaging, which was more accurate than any of the (18)F-FDG criteria for all prostheses, as well as for hips and knees separately, was significantly more sensitive than criterion 3 (P < 0.001) and criterion 4 (P < 0.001) and was significantly more specific than criterion 1 (P < 0.001), criterion 2 (P < 0.001), and criterion 3 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Regardless of how the images are interpreted, coincidence detection-based (18)F-FDG imaging is less accurate than, and cannot replace, labeled leukocyte/marrow imaging for diagnosing infection of the failed prosthetic joint.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Postischemic stunning after adenosine vasodilator stress.

BACKGROUND: Ischemic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction may occur after exercise but is regarded as uncommon after vasodilator stress. We evaluated the prevalence of LV dysfunction after adenosine stress in relation to reversible perfusion defects and angiographic coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 86 patients referred for clinically indicated adenosine dual-isotope gated single photon emission computed tomography: 43 with 1 or more reversible perfusion defects (reversible defect group) and 43 age- and sex-matched patients with no known CAD and normal LV perfusion and function (control group). Coronary angiography was performed in 36 of 43 patients (84%) in the reversible defect group. Perfusion was interpreted based on 20-segment/5-point summed rest and stress scores. The extent of reversibility was defined by the summed difference score. LV ejection fraction and volumes at rest and 60 minutes after adenosine and segmental wall thickening were quantified by QGS (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, Calif). In patients with extensive reversible perfusion defects (summed difference score > or =8), 8 of 25 (32%) demonstrated depressed post-adenosine LV ejection fraction, abnormal segmental wall thickening, end-systolic dilation, and extensive CAD. CONCLUSION: Adenosine is believed to be less likely than exercise to induce ischemia. However, myocardial stunning occurred in one third of the patients with severe reversible defects, consistent with ischemia.

Adenosine↗