PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Kenneth O Devaney

Publications and source records attributed to Kenneth O Devaney.

40 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

A head and neck cancer patient dies! Why perform an autopsy: for the relatives, for the clinicians or for the pathologists?

It is no secret that autopsy rates at most hospitals worldwide--both teaching and community hospitals--have declined precipitously in recent decades, but is this a desirable state of affairs? This article explores this issue from three viewpoints: that of the family members who grant permission for autopsies; that of the clinicians who seek permission for the autopsy to be carried out; and that of the pathologists who actually perform the post-mortem examination. Family concerns about (the sometimes tangential) matter of organ retention following autopsy have recently been highlighted in Europe, with an accompanying negative overall impression of the autopsy being conveyed by many outlets of the popular media. Clinicians will often concede that they feel somewhat distanced from the whole process of autopsy, and so do not hold it in such high esteem as their predecessors once did decades ago. Pathologists at present often perform autopsies as "additional duties" to be fitted in around their central functions, and so do not see them as a primary task to be accomplished. However, there are reasons why this may be detrimental to patient care, including in particular the fact that clinical/radiographic diagnoses are sometimes not confirmed by the results of a complete autopsy. Suggestions for improving the autopsy rate--in particular amongst head and neck cancer patients--are discussed, and include performance of a more rapid limited autopsy and the designation of specialist pathologists in head and neck cancer to carry out autopsies of these patients as an extension of their clinical duties. One conclusion seems inescapable: to increase autopsy rates, the status of the procedure will necessarily have to be upgraded from that of "afterthought/perfunctory task" to that of "consultation", with all of the shifts in attitude such a modification would entail.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2002

Prognostic significance of microscopic and macroscopic extracapsular spread from metastatic tumor in the cervical lymph nodes.

It has been established that the presence or absence of cervical node metastases in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a powerful prognostic indicator. This report reviews the evolution of thinking over the past 70 years with regard to the import and detection of cervical nodal metastases which exhibit spread of tumor beyond the confines of the original encompassing nodal capsule. In the process, this discussion touches upon clinical examination, gross and microscopic pathologic examination, and radiographic imaging studies. In particular, the distinction between gross nodal extracapsular spread of tumor and microscopic nodal extracapsular spread of tumor has been drawn in recent reports; this raises the possibility that identification of microscopic breaching of the nodc capsule by tumor might provide clinically significant information which is not provided by the gross observation of an intact lymph node capsule. While it remains to be seen whether microscopic extracapsular spread alone will prove to be an important prognostic factor, it is recommended that selective neck dissection continue to be offered even in those patients with clinically negative necks; further studies should aid in defining the import of microscopic extracapsular tumor spread in patients with positive cervical nodes.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗