PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Kenneth R DeVault

Publications and source records attributed to Kenneth R DeVault.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2007

Medical management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a common worldwide disorder. Most patients have typical symptoms of heartburn, regurgitation and exacerbation of symptoms with large meal volumes, fatty meals, recumbency or bending forward. Patients who show typical symptoms for under 10 years may be treated empirically with lifestyle and dietary modifications plus acid-suppressing medications. The recent decrease in cost, established safety and wide availability of proton pump inhibitors make them the best choice for monotherapy. Other medical therapies include antacids, H(2) receptor antagonists and prokinetic agents. Patients who have alarm symptoms or long-standing symptoms should have an esophagoscopy to evaluate for complications of reflux. Patients who do not respond to therapy should have a test to confirm the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Esophagogastric Junction↗
PubMed2006

Use of acid suppressive medications after laparoscopic antireflux surgery: prevalence and clinical indications.

Laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS) provides effective control of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in more than 90% of patients. Despite this high success rate, some patients continue to consume acid suppressive medications after surgical intervention. In this study we evaluate the prevalence, clinical indications, and cause of use of acid reducing drugs in patients after LARS. Consecutive patients undergoing LARS for GERD were surveyed 2-3 years after surgery regarding use of acid suppressive medications, surgical outcome, and GERD specific symptoms. During the study period, 119 patients underwent LARS at our center. Ninety-eight (82%) were available for interview. Two patients died of unrelated causes and two declined to be interviewed. The remaining 94 individuals are the subject of this report. Ninety-four percent were satisfied with the outcome of surgery. Despite this high satisfaction rate, 37 of 94 (39%) were on antireflux medication (ARM; 62% proton pump inhibitors, 22% H2-receptor antagonists, and 16% others), with 70% using continuous medication. Of these patients, 54% took ARM after surgery for GERD-related symptoms, 95% of these patients responded to medical therapy, and yet again, 85% remained satisfied with the surgical outcome. Forty-six percent of patients on ARM after surgery had no GERD symptoms and took ARM for nonappropriate indications such as bloating. Only 47% of these responded to ARM; 82% of this group was satisfied with the surgical outcome. In conclusion, the use of ARM after LARS is a common occurrence despite a high satisfaction rate with this operation. Nearly half of patients consuming ARS after LARS are taking these medications for symptoms not necessarily related to GER. These findings underscore the importance of patient education in the use of these agents.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Barrett's esophagus is common in older men and women undergoing screening colonoscopy regardless of reflux symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Although Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the precursor of esophageal adenocarcinoma (ACA), most patients with ACA present outside of a BE surveillance program. This could be due to undiagnosed symptomatic GER and BE or BE/ACA occurring in patients without reflux symptoms. We have, therefore, studied the prevalence of BE and symptom status in older patients referred for colonoscopy. METHODS: All patients referred for outpatient colonoscopy were eligible if they were at least 65 yr old and had not previously undergone esophagoscopy. After informed consent, the patients completed detailed GER questionnaires. During the research endoscopy, the endoscopist recorded the squamocolumnar junction (SCJ) as either long-segment BE (LSBE), short-segment BE (SSBE), or normal. If the SCJ was felt to be "irregular" the endoscopist was asked to predict, in their judgment, if BE was present. All patients had biopsies below the SCJ, which were examined by a gastrointestinal pathologist who was blinded to the endoscopic findings. RESULTS: BE esophagus was present in 50 of the 300 patients studied (16.7%). BE was more common in men (35 of 161, 21.7%) than in women (15 of 139, 10.8%) (p < 0.025). GERD symptoms were reported in 106 patients (35%) and BE was present in 19.8% of symptomatic and 14.9% of asymptomatic cases (NS). The majority of the BE in this study was less than 3 cm in length (92%). The questionnaires did not predict the presence of BE. CONCLUSIONS: BE is common in unscreened male and female patients at least 65 yr of age who are referred for colonoscopy. Men were more likely than women to have BE although it occurred in both sexes. Reflux symptoms were fairly common but a poor predictor of BE.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2006

Enhanced magnification-directed biopsies do not increase the detection of intestinal metaplasia in patients with GERD.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus (BE) requires histologic confirmation of specialized intestinal metaplasia (SIM) through biopsy, a technique prone to sampling error. One method designed to improve the yield of biopsy uses acetic acid with magnification endoscopy: enhanced magnification endoscopy (EME). This technique identifies several mucosal surface patterns, and of these, pattern types III and IV have been associated with SIM. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized trial to compare EME-directed biopsies and standard endoscopy with random biopsies in patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Patients in the standard endoscopy group with evidence of BE had four-quadrant random biopsies taken every 2 cm. If there was no BE, four-quadrant biopsies were taken at the SCJ. Patients in the EME group had the mucosa at the SCJ classified as type I-IV based on published criteria. Biopsies targeted to type III and IV were compared to random biopsies. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-seven patients enrolled (68 randomized to EME, 69 to standard endoscopy). Fifty-six (41%) had endoscopic evidence of BE (20 standard endoscopy [29%] vs 36 EME [53%]). Of the patients with apparent BE, standard endoscopy with random biopsies confirmed SIM in 12 (60%) compared to 11 of 18 (61%) patients with EME targeted biopsies of patterns type III or IV (p = 1.0). Patients without apparent BE (N = 81) had SIM of the SCJ confirmed in 16% (8 of 49) with standard endoscopy and random biopsies compared with 8% (1 of 12) using EME-directed biopsy of pattern III or IV (p = 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: Random biopsies of endoscopically apparent BE and a normal SCJ yield SIM at the same rate as targeted biopsies with EME in patients with pattern types III or IV. This calls into question the utility of this technique in reducing sampling error to identify SIM.

Barrett Esophagus↗
PubMed2005

Catheter-based pH monitoring: use in evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms (on and off therapy).

Tube-based ambulatory pH testing has rapidly evolved in the past 3 decades to become the standard by which other diagnostic approaches to gastroesophageal reflux disease are judged. Acid exposure 5 cm above the manometrically determined lower esophageal sphincter is the standard for documentation of pathologic acid exposure of the distal esophagus. Proximal esophageal or hypopharyngeal monitoring is an evolving technique that may shed light on patients with supraesophageal symptoms. The ability to simultaneously monitor esophageal and gastric acidity (usually in patients with persistent symptoms despite therapy) is another advantage of this technique. Whether the new system that allows simultaneous pH and impedance monitoring and the system that uses an implantable tubeless monitoring capsule will supplant this older but well-established technology remains to be determined.

Ambulatory Care↗
PubMed2005

Updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were published in 1995 and updated in 1999. These and other guidelines undergo periodic review. Advances continue to be made in the area of GERD, leading us to review and revise previous guideline statements. GERD is defined as symptoms or mucosal damage produced by the abnormal reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus. These guidelines were developed under the auspices of the American College of Gastroenterology and its Practice Parameters Committee, and approved by the Board of Trustees. Diagnostic guidelines address empiric therapy and the use of endoscopy, ambulatory reflux monitoring, and esophageal manometry in GERD. Treatment guidelines address the role of lifestyle changes, patient directed (OTC) therapy, acid suppression, promotility therapy, maintenance therapy, antireflux surgery, and endoscopic therapy in GERD. Finally, there is a discussion of the rare patient with refractory GERD and a list of areas in need of additional study.

Anti-Ulcer Agents↗
PubMed2004

Recurrent Barrett's esophagus and adenocarcinoma after esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy is considered the gold standard for the treatment of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus (BE) and for noninvasive adenocarcinoma (ACA) of the distal esophagus. If all of the metaplastic epithelium is removed, the patient is considered "cured". Despite this, BE has been reported in patients who have previously undergone esophagectomy. It is often debated whether this is "new" BE or the result of an esophagectomy that did not include a sufficiently proximal margin. Our aim was to determine if BE recurred in esophagectomy patients where the entire segment of BE had been removed. METHODS: Records were searched for patients who had undergone esophagectomy for cure at our institution. Records were reviewed for surgical, endoscopic, and histopathologic findings. The patients in whom we have endoscopic follow-up are the subjects of this report. RESULTS: Since 1995, 45 patients have undergone esophagectomy for cure for Barrett's dysplasia or localized ACA. Thirty-six of these 45 patients underwent endoscopy after surgery including 8/45 patients (18%) with recurrent Barrett's metaplasia or neoplasia after curative resection. CONCLUSION: Recurrent Barrett's esophagus or adenocarcinoma after esophagectomy was common in our patients who underwent at least one endoscopy after surgery. This appears to represent the development of metachronous disease after complete resection of esophageal disease. Half of these patients have required subsequent treatment thus far, either repeat surgery or photodynamic therapy. These results support the use of endoscopic surveillance in patients who have undergone "curative" esophagectomy for Barrett's dysplasia or localized cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2004

Evaluation of vagus nerve function before and after antireflux surgery.

We sought to evaluate vagus nerve integrity before and after antireflux surgery and to compare it with symptomatic outcome. Antireflux surgery patients were recruited. Patients with disorders associated with vagus dysfunction or who took medications with anticholinergic effects were excluded. Each patient underwent a sham-feeding-stimulated pancreatic polypeptide (PP) test before and after surgery. A symptom survey was also administered. Twenty patients completed preoperative testing; their mean age was 57 years, and postoperative testing results were available for 16 of them. Of the 20, 14 (70%) had an appropriate increase in PP level with sham-meal preoperatively. All 4 patients with an abnormal preoperative test remained abnormal, and 5 of 12 (42%) with a normal preoperative test had an abnormal postoperative result; thus 9 of 16 (56%) had an abnormal postoperative PP test. In 15 patients, assessments of bowel function were obtained before and after surgery. Six of 15 (40%) patients developed new or worse symptoms (diarrhea in 4, flatus in 2). The symptoms did not correlate with PP results. This suggests that some patients referred for antireflux surgery have evidence of abnormal vagus function that persists after surgery. Many patients (42%) with normal testing before surgery develop an abnormal test after surgery. There was no correlation between PP tests and the development or worsening of bowel symptoms.

Fundoplication↗
PubMed2004

Should upper gastrointestinal endoscopy be part of the evaluation for supraesophageal symptoms of GERD?

The past decade has witnessed increasing interest in the supraesophageal (ear, nose, and throat (ENT)) symptoms potentially caused by gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Hoarseness, halitosis, problems with vocal presentations, excessive phlegm, frequent throat clearing, globus sensation, sore throat, cough, aspiration, laryngospasm, and laryngeal carcinoma are some, but not all of the ENT symptoms that have been attributed to GERD (1). The availability of highly effective medical and surgical therapies allows for control of these symptoms in many patients adding to the importance of accurately diagnosing GERD.

Esophagoscopy↗
PubMed2004

Complications of endoscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract: a single-center experience.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prospectively the complications that occurred during consecutive endoscopies of the upper gastrointestinal tract. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated all endoscopies of the upper gastrointestinal tract (except endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endosonography) performed at the Ambulatory Surgical Center at the Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Fla, between January 1999 and June 2002. A staff gastroenterologist with or without a trainee performed these procedures. Therapeutic procedures included esophageal band ligation, injection sclerotherapy, botulinum toxin injection, extended upper endoscopy, pneumatic balloon dilation, endoscopic mucosal resection, and endoscopic ablation using thermal laser, argon beam coagulator, or photodynamic therapy. All complications were tabulated prospectively as per mandatory state licensure reporting. RESULTS: Complications after diagnostic endoscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract were related to anesthesia in 2 of the 12,841 patients. Perforations in 5 patients were associated with esophageal dilation (2), resection of duodenal lesions (2), or passage of a side-viewing instrument into the duodenum (1). No deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic endoscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract is safe, with a complication rate of less than 1 per 5000 cases. Therapeutic endoscopy increases the risk of complications. Compared with complication rates published previously, our results from a single center indicate a favorable reduction in complications related to endoscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Bowel dysfunction after laparoscopic antireflux surgery: incidence, severity, and clinical course.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence, severity, and clinical course of postoperative bowel dysfunction, primarily diarrhea, after laparoscopic antireflux surgery. METHODS: Patients who underwent laparoscopic antireflux surgery during January to December 1998 responded to a questionnaire about pre-existing and postoperative bowel symptoms, which included questions about the type of bowel dysfunction (diarrhea, abdominal pain, bloating, constipation), onset in relation to surgery, frequency, severity, duration, use of medical resources or diagnostic evaluations, and treatment outcome. RESULTS: Of the 109 patients who underwent laparoscopic antireflux surgery at our center during the study, 84 (77%) completed the survey. Thirty-six (43%) had no bowel dysfunction before or after surgery, whereas 29 (35%) had pre-existing bowel dysfunction. New bowel symptoms developed postoperatively in 30 patients (36%), including bloating in 16 (19%) and diarrhea in 15 (18%). Two thirds of the patients with new diarrhea developed it within 6 weeks after surgery. The severity of the diarrhea ranged from mild to debilitating; 4 had fecal incontinence. Most patients (13/15) with diarrhea had symptoms for > or =2 years following surgery. No patient was hospitalized, and only 2 patients reported temporary work loss. CONCLUSION: Postoperative bowel dysfunction, namely diarrhea, is an important adverse effect of antireflux surgery. Awareness of this complication should lead to prompt recognition, effective management, and reduction in anxiety.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Resource utilization and procedure parameters for the Stretta procedure: comparison with endoscopic ultrasonography and colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND: No data are available regarding resource utilization of the Stretta procedure and its impact on endoscopy units in comparison with other endoscopy procedures. METHODS: This observational cohort study compared the demographic data and procedural parameters for our first 13 cases undergoing the Stretta procedure, with similar endoscopic colonoscopy and ultrasonography (EUS) cases. RESULTS: The characteristics of the patients were similar among these groups. The patients undergoing the Stretta procedure required significantly more sedative medication than those undergoing colonoscopy or EUS. The Stretta procedure time and recovery time were significantly longer than the colonoscopy procedure time and recovery time. The Stretta procedure time was also significantly longer than the EUS procedure time, but the Stretta recovery time was not significantly longer than the EUS recovery time. CONCLUSIONS: Although this study is small and not randomized, it provides useful information regarding how endoscopic procedures compare with one another. Furthermore, these findings have implications for determining endoscopy unit staffing, work equivalency, and appropriate reimbursement.

Adjuvants, Anesthesia↗
PubMed2003

Failure of esophageal peristalsis in older patients: association with esophageal acid exposure.

OBJECTIVES: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is common in all ages, but its prevalence appears to increase with age. Older patients often need aggressive medical therapy and are frequently being considered for antireflux surgery. We sought to evaluate the physiological defect (lower esophageal sphincter [LES] pressures, esophageal motility, and acid exposure) in a group of GERD patients >or= 65 yr old in comparison with a younger population ( or=65 yr old and the control group of those 10%). Motility parameters (LES and esophageal body) were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Of 349 patients who underwent manometry and pH testing during the study period, 133 were >or=65 yr old, and 48 were 10% (12.6 mm Hg in the or=65-yr-old patients, p < 0.05). The percentage of swallows that induced normal peristalsis was lowest in the >or=65-yr-old patients compared with the 10% acid exposure (62.5% vs 95%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Reflux in older patients is complicated by disordered esophageal motility. This impaired motility may decrease acid clearance, result in more difficult to control disease, and may render these patients susceptible to GERD complications.

Adult↗