PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Kenneth Robert Niere

Publications and source records attributed to Kenneth Robert Niere.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Reproducibility and responsiveness of the Whiplash Disability Questionnaire.

This study continued the validation of a Whiplash Specific Disability Questionnaire (WDQ) that was developed from the Neck Disability Index (NDI) using self-reported disabilities in a group of participants experiencing whiplash-associated disorders [J Manipulative Physiol Ther 14 (1991) 409]. Previous research has established the content, construct and face validity and internal consistency of the WDQ. The aim of this study was to establish the short-term and medium-term test-retest reliability and responsiveness of the WDQ. Participants (n = 63) receiving physiotherapy treatment for WAD were recruited from 30 private physiotherapy practices in Melbourne, Australia. Each participant completed three WDQ questionnaires over a 1-month period, the first two separated by 24 h. The third questionnaire contained an additional item that asked respondents to rate their perceived change in condition over the month. Reproducibility was determined using an intra-class correlation co-efficient. Responsiveness was assessed via correlation with participant perceived change, the effect size, standardised response mean (SRM) and the responsiveness statistic. Results demonstrated excellent short-term test-retest reliability (ICC 0.96). Reproducibility over 1 month was excellent (ICC 0.93). Correlation between change in WDQ score over 1 month and participant perceived change was r(s) = 0.64, the effect size was 0.03, the SRM was 0.08 and the responsiveness statistics were 0.90 (participants who improved) and -1.60 (participants who deteriorated). The minimal detectable change of the WDQ was established at 15 points. These results demonstrate that the WDQ has excellent short- and medium-term reproducibility and responsiveness in a population seeking treatment for WAD.

Adolescent↗

Clinicians' perceptions of minor cervical instability.

Appropriate musculoskeletal physiotherapy management of spinal conditions requires recognition of clinical patterns in order to make a provisional diagnosis. This study aimed to assist the recognition of minor cervical instability (MCI) by surveying clinicians experienced in the management of neck conditions. A total of 153 Australian physiotherapists with postgraduate qualifications in manipulative physiotherapy and experience in the management of neck conditions completed a questionnaire that required them to indicate the importance of 15 clinical findings in the diagnosis of MCI. The responses were examined descriptively then subjected to factor analysis to identify possible groupings of findings. Clinical findings considered by greater than 50% of respondents to be either very important or vitally important in the diagnosis of MCI were: a history of major trauma; reports of the neck catching or locking or giving way; poor muscular control; signs of hypermobility on X-ray; excessively free end-feel on passive motion testing and unpredictability of symptoms. The factor analysis resulted in four distinct factors, each clinically interpretable. Therapists treating patients with neck conditions should at least consider the possibility of MCI when presented with any of the six findings reported above or with any of the groupings of findings identified by the factor analysis.

Cervical Vertebrae↗