PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Kenny Q Ye

Publications and source records attributed to Kenny Q Ye.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

A gene-model-free method for linkage analysis of a disease-related-trait based on analysis of proband/sibling pairs.

In this paper we investigate the power of finding linkage to a disease locus through analysis of the disease-related traits. We propose two family-based gene-model-free linkage statistics. Both involve considering the distribution of the number of alleles identical by descent with the proband and comparing siblings with the disease-related trait to those without the disease-related-trait. The objective is to find linkages to disease-related traits that are pleiotropic for both the disease and the disease-related-traits. The power of these statistics is investigated for Kofendrerd Personality Disorder-related traits a (Joining/founding cults) and trait b (Fear/discomfort with strangers) of the simulated data. The answers were known prior to the execution of the reported analyses. We find that both tests have very high power when applied to the samples created by combining the data of the three cities for which we have nuclear family data.

Chromosome Mapping↗

Using mixture models to characterize disease-related traits.

We consider 12 event-related potentials and one electroencephalogram measure as disease-related traits to compare alcohol-dependent individuals (cases) to unaffected individuals (controls). We use two approaches: 1) two-way analysis of variance (with sex and alcohol dependency as the factors), and 2) likelihood ratio tests comparing sex adjusted values of cases to controls assuming that within each group the trait has a 2 (or 3) component normal mixture distribution. In the second approach, we test the null hypothesis that the parameters of the mixtures are equal for the cases and controls. Based on the two-way analysis of variance, we find 1) males have significantly (p < 0.05) lower mean response values than females for 7 of these traits. 2) Alcohol-dependent cases have significantly lower mean response than controls for 3 traits. The mixture analysis of sex-adjusted values of 1 of these traits, the event-related potential obtained at the parietal midline channel (ttth4), found the appearance of a 3-component normal mixture in cases and controls. The mixtures differed in that the cases had significantly lower mean values than controls and significantly different mixing proportions in 2 of the 3 components. Implications of this study are: 1) Sex needs to be taken into account when studying risk factors for alcohol dependency to prevent finding a spurious association between alcohol dependency and the risk factor. 2) Mixture analysis indicates that for the event-related potential "ttth4", the difference observed reflects strong evidence of heterogeneity of response in both the cases and controls.

Alcoholism↗

Locating disease genes using Bayesian variable selection with the Haseman-Elston method.

BACKGROUND: We applied stochastic search variable selection (SSVS), a Bayesian model selection method, to the simulated data of Genetic Analysis Workshop 13. We used SSVS with the revisited Haseman-Elston method to find the markers linked to the loci determining change in cholesterol over time. To study gene-gene interaction (epistasis) and gene-environment interaction, we adopted prior structures, which incorporate the relationship among the predictors. This allows SSVS to search in the model space more efficiently and avoid the less likely models. RESULTS: In applying SSVS, instead of looking at the posterior distribution of each of the candidate models, which is sensitive to the setting of the prior, we ranked the candidate variables (markers) according to their marginal posterior probability, which was shown to be more robust to the prior. Compared with traditional methods that consider one marker at a time, our method considers all markers simultaneously and obtains more favorable results. CONCLUSIONS: We showed that SSVS is a powerful method for identifying linked markers using the Haseman-Elston method, even for weak effects. SSVS is very effective because it does a smart search over the entire model space.

Bayes Theorem↗

Data mining and computationally intensive methods: summary of Group 7 contributions to Genetic Analysis Workshop 13.

The Framingham Heart Study data, as well as a related simulated data set, were generously provided to the participants of the Genetic Analysis Workshop 13 in order that newly developed and emerging statistical methodologies could be tested on that well-characterized data set. The impetus driving the development of novel methods is to elucidate the contributions of genes, environment, and interactions between and among them, as well as to allow comparison between and validation of methods. The seven papers that comprise this group used data-mining methodologies (tree-based methods, neural networks, discriminant analysis, and Bayesian variable selection) in an attempt to identify the underlying genetics of cardiovascular disease and related traits in the presence of environmental and genetic covariates. Data-mining strategies are gaining popularity because they are extremely flexible and may have greater efficiency and potential in identifying the factors involved in complex disorders. While the methods grouped together here constitute a diverse collection, some papers asked similar questions with very different methods, while others used the same underlying methodology to ask very different questions. This paper briefly describes the data-mining methodologies applied to the Genetic Analysis Workshop 13 data sets and the results of those investigations.

Bayes Theorem↗

A method for evaluating the results of Bayesian model selection: application to linkage analyses of attributes determined by two or more genes.

OBJECTIVES: We apply and evaluate the intrinsic Bayes factor (IBF) of Berger and Pericchi [J Am Stat Assoc 1996;91:109-122; Bayesian Statistics, Oxford University Press, vol 5, 1996] to linkage analyses done using the stochastic search variable selection (SSVS) method of George and McCulloch [J Am Stat Assoc 1993;88:881-889] as proposed by Suh et al. [Genet Epidemiol 2001;21(suppl 1):S706-S711]. METHODS: We consider 20 simulations of linkage data obtained under two different generating models. The SSVS is applied to a multiple regression extension [Genet Epidemiol 2001;21(suppl 1): S706-S711] of the Haseman-Elston [Behav Genet 1972;2:3-19; Genet Epidemiol 2000;19:1-17] methods. Four prior distributions are considered. We apply the IBF criterion to those samples where different prior distributions result in different top models. RESULTS: In those samples where three different models were obtained using the four priors, application of the IBFs eliminated one of the two wrong models in 4 out of 5 situations. Further elimination using the IBF criterion for situations with two different subsets did not serve as well. CONCLUSIONS: When different priors result in three or more different subsets of markers, one can use the IBF to get this number down to two for consideration. When two subsets result we recommend that both be considered.

Bayes Theorem↗