Biomedical subjects

Kent D Nash

Publications and source records attributed to Kent D Nash.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

The endodontic workforce.

The amount of endodontic care provided in the US requires an understanding of the supply and demand for such care. The supply side includes the number and location of endodontists, type of provider, and productivity. The demand side consists of the changing demographics of the age groups that endodontists predominantly treat along with changes in their dental health. To address these issues, we have compiled and analyzed data from American Dental Association (ADA) with other sources such as US government census data and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES). From 1982 to 2002, the supply of endodontists increased at a rate greater than that observed with general practitioners or the other specialty areas. The growth of endodontists in relation to general practitioners is important. The latter are co-providers of endodontic care as well as a primary source for referral of patients to endodontists. Demographic and disease changes are likely to impact the need and demand for endodontic services. Endodontists' patients are generally between the ages of 25 and 64 yrs. Currently, the majority of endodontists' patients are members of the large baby boom generation who in 2000 ranged in age from their late 30s to their late 50s. During the next 20 yrs the Baby Boom generation will be replaced by the numerically smaller Generation-X cohort. This generation has experienced substantially less total caries than baby-boomers and they most likely will have fewer endodontic sequela as they age. A moderating factor that could partially offset the predicted decline in numbers of patients is the increased number of teeth that Generation-Xers are likely to retain. A flexible endodontic workforce strategy must assess the impending demographic and disease trends in relation to future growth rates of both endodontists and general practitioners.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Private practice and the economic rate of return for residency training as a prosthodontist.

BACKGROUND: The authors used survey data to estimate the economic rate of return from undertaking an investment in residency training to become a practicing prosthodontist. METHODS: The authors estimated earnings of practicing prosthodontists using results from a survey of 2500 U.S. prosthodontists. Survey data were used to assess the total costs of prosthodontic residency and earnings of practicing general practitioners. The authors applied statistical methods to estimate the internal rate of return (IRR) for prosthodontic residency training. RESULTS: The estimated IRR ranged from 8.23 percent for private practitioners with no financial assistance during residency training to 12.18 percent for full-time private practitioners with stipends and loans. Total costs of residency ranged from 271,835 dollars to 441,321 dollars, depending on the amount of forgone earnings, time in practice and how soon practice began after the residency. CONCLUSIONS: All of the estimates of IRR in this study were positive, indicating that prosthodontic residency is a financially attractive investment. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The positive IRR for prosthodontic residency indicates that the demand for advanced education in prosthodontics will continue, and that the amount of time spent in practice increases the rate of return.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗

PubMed2002

Private practicing endodontists: production of endodontic services and implications for workforce policy.

The methods and techniques used by private practicing endodontists to provide patient care are at the core of endodontic workforce policy. Productivity influences both the amount of care provided and the required number of practicing endodontists in the future. Data was collected from practicing endodontists in order to characterize the technical methods of producing endodontic services. This data was then used to develop a statistical model for use in assessing the national endodontic workforce conditions in the United States. A survey was mailed to a random sample of 2,075 private practicing endodontists in the United States based on membership files from the American Association of Endodontists and the American Dental Association. The overall survey consisted of three means of data collection: (1) a survey about the endodontic practice as a whole; (2) a survey about the endodontist; and (3) patient encounter forms used when collecting detailed endodontic procedure data for a single day in the practice. The model was used to obtain a projection of 4,016 endodontists in the year 2005 and 4,671 practicing endodontists in 2010 required to meet the projected demand for endodontic care. The model and survey data provide valuable information to practicing endodontists for use in identifying critical elements used to render care, how the elements are combined in the practice of endodontics, and the minimum number of endodontists required to provide a given volume of endodontic care.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Prosthodontics as a specialty private practice: net income of private practitioners.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to use data from a survey of prosthodontists in the US to examine average net earnings of prosthodontists in private practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey of 2500 prosthodontists in the US was used to estimate the net earnings of practicing prosthodontists. The national average net earnings of prosthodontists in private practice was estimated along with average earnings for subgroups of prosthodontists. Estimates for private practitioners by age, gender, size of practice, full-time/part-time status, practice ownership, and by type of treatment procedures rendered by the practitioner were also included. RESULTS: Average earnings for prosthodontists in private practice on a primary or secondary basis were estimated to be $215,300 and for prosthodontists who own or share in the ownership of a private practice, $233,920. Reported earnings estimates ranged from $96,160 for non-owners of a private practice and $103,350 for part-time private practitioners to $233,920 for practice owners and $275,170 for prosthodontists in practice with two prosthodontists. The average earnings of prosthodontists who are practice owners were estimated to be 35% higher than the corresponding general practitioners. CONCLUSION: Average net earnings are often used to examine the current economic health of a profession. The average net earnings of prosthodontists in private practice exceed the average net income reported by the American Dental Association for all dentists and all general practitioners and they are competitive with earnings among all specialty groups. This evaluation of the net earnings of prosthodontists shows that prosthodontics offers a competitive career opportunity for the general dentist with a personal desire to pursue advanced dental education in a specialty as a profession.

Adult↗