PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Ketil W Skjøstad

Publications and source records attributed to Ketil W Skjøstad.

2 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Consequences of increased rigidity in palatal implants for snoring: a randomized controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: Palatal implants have seen an increased role in the treatment of snoring. In this study, we evaluate the safety and possible treatment effect of adding further stiffness to the palate through the use of a more rigid implant. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized double-blind study of 20 patients with primary snoring. Three polyethylene teralphate implants were placed in the soft palate with the patient under local anesthesia. Ten patients received regular implants (rigidity 1.0) and 10 patients received stiffer implants (rigidity 1.8). The patients and their bed partners were followed for 6 months with questionnaires and office visits. A sleep study was performed preoperatively and at the last follow-up. RESULTS: Four of the 10 patients with stiffer implants had 5 partial extrusions in the observation period. There was a nonsignificant reduction in snoring intensity from 8.1 to 6.1 evaluated by the bed partner on a visual analogue scale in this group. No extrusions were seen in the group with regular implants. This group showed a significant reduction in snoring intensity from 7.7 to 4.7. No other major adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: Rigid implants cause short time extrusions with loss of treatment effect. Regular implants reduce palatal snoring intensity with high patient and bed partner satisfaction. EBM RATING: A-1b.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Palatal implants: a new method for the treatment of snoring.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, feasibility and effectiveness of a treatment for snoring using permanent palatal implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a prospective, non-randomized study involving 35 healthy patients (26 males, 9 females) referred for treatment of habitual snoring. A baseline medical examination, an evaluation of snoring-related subjective symptoms and an overnight sleep analysis were performed. Three PET implants were placed in the palate of each patient using a new delivery device under local anaesthesia. The patients were followed by means of office visits at 2-3, 14, 30 and 90 days postoperatively, at which discomfort, pain, adverse events and changes in snoring-related parameters were recorded. RESULTS: The average time required for the procedure was 8 min; 23% of the patients required no postoperative analgesia; the average consumption of analgesic was 125 mg of diclofenac and the average duration of analgesia was 1.5 days after the procedure. No bleeding, haematoma or infection were observed. Two of the implants were extruded; both of these patients experienced a satisfactory reduction in snoring intensity and no replacements were necessary. The mean reduction in snoring intensity was 51%, with the visual analogue scale score evaluated by the bed partner falling from 7.3 to 3.6 (p<0.001). The Epworth Sleepiness Score dropped from 9.3 to 4.6 (p<0.001). In total, 86% of the bed partners and 89% of the patients recommended the procedure. CONCLUSION: The new palatal implant system is safe and is associated with low morbidity. It is a fast, simple and effective treatment for snoring.

Adult↗