PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Kevin Pauza

Publications and source records attributed to Kevin Pauza.

2 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Treating radiculopathy with an indwelling epidural catheter and infusion pump.

BACKGROUND: For the purpose of reducing inflammation causing radiculopathy, lumbar transforaminal and interlaminar epidural injections deliver corticosteroid to the vicinity of the spinal nerve, nerve roots, and intervertebral disc. Although acceptable, the efficacy of transforaminal injections is limited and variable. An indwelling epidural catheter offers the distinct advantages of delivering greater concentrations of corticosteroid directly to the site of pathology, over an extended duration. This extended exposure to corticosteroid may benefit the site of pathology. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of corticosteroid administered through a disposable indwelling epidural catheter and infusion pump to treat pain and dysfunction caused by lumbosacral radiculopathy. STUDY DESIGN: A pilot investigation consisting of a prospective consecutive series of 10 patients, conducted in a specialty hospital. METHODS: An indwelling epidural catheter dispensed corticosteroid into the epidural space at the suspect level of pathology. The catheter was attached to an external, lightweight, spring-pressurized, and disposable reservoir pump holding 8.0 mg dexamethasone diluted with bacteriostatic normal saline to a total volume of 72 ml. After each patient's hospital discharge, the medication was administered into the epidural space at a rate of 1 ml per hour over a 72-hour period. Follow-up at six weeks was achieved in 100% of the patients. OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome measures, recorded at pre-treatment and six weeks post-treatment were assessed using: the Visual Analog Scale (VAS); MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36); Pain Symptoms Survey; Oswestry Disability Index; Beck Inventory; Work History Survey; Work Index; Expectations Met Survey; Activities of Daily Living Form; and the Satisfaction With Treatment Form. RESULTS: There was no patient morbidity or mortality associated with this treatment, and patients, on average, experienced decreased pain levels after treatment. Mean delta VAS improvement was 4.1 (SD = 2.6, R =-9.6 to +1.5). The mean percent improvement was 46.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Safe and effective treatment of lower extremity radiculopathy symptoms may be obtained with this new method.

Journal Article↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Provocative cervical discography symptom mapping.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: In a small prospective study assessing 10 symptomatic and 10 asymptomatic subjects, Schellhas et al. compared cervical discography to magnetic resonance imaging. Within that study he reported on the distribution of pain for the C3-C4 to C6-C7 levels. Four years later, Grubb and Ellis reported retrospective data from his 12-year experience using cervical discography from C2-C3 to C7-T1 in 173 patients. To date, no large prospective study defining pain referral patterns for each cervical disc has been performed. PURPOSE: To conduct a prospective visual and statistical descriptive study of pain provocation of a cohort of subjects undergoing cervical discography. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Prospective multicenter descriptive study. METHODS: Pain referral maps were generated for each disc level from patients undergoing cervical discography with at least two levels assessed. If concordant pain was reproduced in a morphologically abnormal disc, the subject immediately completed a pain diagram. An independent observer interviewed the subject and recorded the location of provoked symptoms. Visual data were compiled using a body sector bit map, which consisted of 48 clinically relevant body regions. Visual maps with graduated color codes and frequencies of symptom location at each cervical disc level were generated. RESULTS: A total of 101 symptom provocation maps were recorded during cervical discography on 41 subjects. There were 10 at C2-C3, 19 at C3-C4, 27 at C4-C5, 27 at C5-C6, 16 at C6-C7 and 2 at C7-T1. Predominantly unilateral symptoms were provoked just as often as bilateral symptoms. The C2-C3 disc referred pain to the neck, subocciput and face. The C3-C4 disc referred pain to the neck, subocciput, trapezius, anterior neck, face, shoulder, interscapular and limb. The C4-C5 disc referred pain to the neck, shoulder, interscapular, trapezius, extremity, face, chest and subocciput. The C5-C6 disc referred pain to the neck, trapezius, interscapular, suboccipital, anterior neck, chest and face. The C6-C7 disc referred pain to the neck, interscapular, trapezius, shoulder, extremity and subocciput. At C7-T1 we produced neck and interscapular pain. Visual maps with graduated color codes and frequencies of symptom location at each cervical disc level were generated. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, these results confirm the observations of prior investigators that cervical internal disc disruption can elicit axial and peripheral symptoms. The particular patterns of pain generation allow the discographer to preprocedurally anticipate disc levels to assess. With these data, the number of disc punctures that are required can be limited rather than routinely assessing all cervical discs.

Cervical Vertebrae↗