Biomedical subjects

Kevin Vernooy

Publications and source records attributed to Kevin Vernooy.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

Intra-ventricular resynchronization for optimal left ventricular function during pacing in experimental left bundle branch block.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate to what extent intra-ventricular asynchrony (intraVA) and inter-ventricular asynchrony (interVA) determine left ventricular (LV) function in canine hearts with left bundle branch block (LBBB) during ventricular pacing. BACKGROUND: Pacing therapy improves LV pump function in patients with heart failure and abnormal ventricular conduction supposedly due to resynchronization. However, the relationship between LV pump function and measures of asynchrony is not well established. METHODS: In 15 experiments, LV (various sites) and biventricular (BiV) pacing was performed at atrioventricular (AV) delays of 20 to 140 ms. Measured were the maximum rate of increase (dP/dt(max)) of LV pressure and LV stroke work (SW) (conductance catheter), interVA (time delay between the upslope of LV and RV pressures), and intraVA (from endocardial electrical activation maps). RESULTS: Induction of LBBB increased interVA (-6.4 +/- 8.6 to -28.4 +/- 8.5 ms [RV earlier]) and intraVA (4.9 +/- 2.4 to 18.0 +/- 3.3 ms), whereas LV dP/dt(max) and SW decreased (-13 +/- 18% and -39 +/- 24%, respectively). During LBBB, LV and BiV pacing increased LV dP/dt(max) and SW (mean increases 14% to 21% and 11% to 15%, respectively) without changing diastolic function or preload. Optimal improvement in LV function was obtained consistently when intraVA returned to pre-LBBB values, while interVA remained elevated. Normalization of intraVA required AV delays shorter than the baseline PQ time during LV apex and BiV pacing, thus excluding endogenous LV activation, but AV delays virtually equal to the baseline PQ time (difference 4 +/- 9 ms, p = NS) during pacing at (mid)lateral LV sites to obtain fusion between pacing-induced and endogenous activation. CONCLUSIONS: In LBBB hearts, optimal restoration of LV systolic function by pacing requires intra-ventricular resynchronization. The optimal AV delay to achieve this depends on both the site of pacing and baseline PQ time.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Absence of reverse electrical remodeling during regression of volume overload hypertrophy in canine ventricles.

OBJECTIVE: Ventricular hypertrophy predisposes for cardiac arrhythmias, presumably due to prolongation of repolarization (electrical remodeling). The temporal relation between the development of hypertrophy and electrical remodeling, as well as their reversibility upon restoration of normal load, however, are poorly understood. This was investigated in the present study using volume overload hypertrophy induced by atrio-ventricular (AV) block and normalization of load by pacing. METHODS: Dogs were subjected to either 16 weeks of AV-block (CAVB group, n=9) or 8 weeks of AV-block followed by 8 weeks of right ventricular (RV) pacing at physiological heart rate (CAVB+PACE group, n=9). RESULTS: Left ventricular (LV) mass (2D-echocardiography) increased after 8 weeks of AV-block to approximately 30% above baseline and returned to 10+/-14% after 8 weeks of pacing. QT-time (surface ECG) also increased after AV-block. However, 8 weeks of pacing did not decrease QT and QTc-time (c=corrected for heart rate), neither during physiological pacing nor during temporary pacing at 100 beats/min. Lack of reverse electrical remodeling was confirmed by the absence of changes in LV and RV action potential duration (monophasic action potentials) at week 8 and 16. CONCLUSIONS: In volume overload hypertrophy due to AV-block, structural and electrical remodeling develop in parallel but restoration of physiological heart rate causes dissociation between reverse structural remodeling and reverse electrical remodeling.

Action Potentials↗

PubMed2002

Quantification of interventricular asynchrony during LBBB and ventricular pacing.

The quantification of mechanical interventricular asynchrony (IVA) was investigated. In 12 dogs left bundle branch block (LBBB) was induced by radio frequency ablation. Left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) pressures were recorded before and after induction of LBBB and during LBBB + LV apex pacing at different atrioventricular (AV) delays. Four IVA measures were validated using computer simulations on experimentally obtained pressure signals. The most robust measure for IVA was the time delay between the upslope of the LV and RV pressure signals (DeltaT(up)), estimated by cross correlation. The induction of experimental LBBB decreased DeltaT(up) from -6.9 +/- 7.0 ms (RV before LV) to -33.9 +/- 7.6 ms (P < 0.05) in combination with a significant decrease of LV maximal first derivative of pressure development over time (dP/dt(max)). During LV apex pacing, DeltaT(up) increased with decreasing AV delay up to +20.9 +/- 14.6 ms (P < 0.05). Interventricular resynchronization (DeltaT(up) = 0 ms) significantly improved LV dP/dt(max) by 15.1 +/- 5.9%. QRS duration increased significantly after induction of LBBB but did not change during LV apex pacing. In conclusion, DeltaT(up) is a reliable measure of mechanical IVA, which adds valuable information concerning the nature of asynchronous activation of the ventricles.

Animals↗