PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Khalid S. Khan

Publications and source records attributed to Khalid S. Khan.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Formative self-assessment using multiple true-false questions on the Internet: feedback according to confidence about correct knowledge.

In undergraduate clinical courses, students are often dispersed over several teaching sites. Traditional curricula do not have mechanisms that allow monitoring of an individual student's educational progress or that of a small group of students at a teaching site relative to that of the whole group. To address these issues, we have developed a web-based formative assessment system that consists of knowledge tests based on multiple true-false questions. During the test, in addition to marking true or false against each question, students indicate their level of confidence (doubt or certainty) about each answer. The feedback consists of whether the answer is correct or incorrect and the confidence with which the student had responded. Feedback to students assesses their own performance in relation to that of their peers. Feedback to tutors provides anonymized information about the level of achievement of students at their teaching site relative to that of students at other sites. This systems has the tools that students can use to direct their learning and tutors can use to tailor their teaching in the light of the instantaneously available comparative feedback.

Journal Article↗

Assessments in evidence-based medicine workshops: loose connection between perception of knowledge and its objective assessment.

The outcome of continuing education programs is often based on self-assessment. We evaluated the relationship of self-assessment of knowledge based on rating scales with scores obtained on objective validated tests in evidence-based medicine workshops. In the West Midlands region (1998), 55 participants attended three workshops in critical appraisal of the medical literature.They completed two self-assessment questionnaires: one used a rating scale to subjectively examine the level of knowledge of six different literature appraisal issues; the other objectively assessed participants' literature appraisal knowledge in those issues using validated multiple true-false questions. Comparison of subjective scores reflecting understanding of specific literature appraisal issues with corresponding objective test scores revealed a poor correlation (r(s) ranged from -0.29 to 0.60 for the different knowledge issues assessed). Perception of ones level of knowledge did not always correlate with correctly possessed knowledge. In some instances, those who thought they were knowledgeable actually possessed incorrect knowledge. Therefore, continuing medical education programs should focus on objective, not subjective tests to assess outcome.

Journal Article↗