PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Kim A Papp

Publications and source records attributed to Kim A Papp.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Approaches to discontinuing efalizumab: an open-label study of therapies for managing inflammatory recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Efalizumab is a humanized recombinant monoclonal IgG1 antibody for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. When treatment discontinuation is necessary, however, some patients may experience inflammatory recurrence of the disease, which can progress to rebound if untreated. This analysis evaluated approaches for managing inflammatory recurrence after discontinuation of efalizumab. METHODS: An open-label, multicentre, investigational study was performed in 41 patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who had recently completed clinical studies with efalizumab and had developed signs of inflammatory recurrence following abrupt cessation of treatment. Patients were assigned by the attending physicians to receive one of five standardised alternative systemic psoriasis treatment regimens for 12 weeks. Efficacy of the different therapy options was assessed using the physician's global assessment (PGA) of change over time. RESULTS: More favourable PGA responses were observed in patients changing to cyclosporin (PGA of 'good', 'excellent' or 'cleared': 7/10 patients, 70.0%) or methotrexate (9/20, 45.0%), compared with those receiving systemic corticosteroids (2/8, 25.0%), retinoids (0/1, 0.0%) or combined corticosteroids plus methotrexate (0/2, 0.0%). While the majority (77.8%) of patients showed inflammatory morphology at baseline, following 12 weeks of the alternative therapies the overall prevalence of inflammatory disease was decreased to 19.2%. CONCLUSION: Inflammatory recurrence after discontinuation of efalizumab therapy is a manageable event, with a number of therapies and approaches available to physicians, including short courses of cyclosporin or methotrexate.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗
PubMed2006

Evaluation of efalizumab using safe psoriasis control.

BACKGROUND: Safe Psoriasis Control (SPC) is an important comprehensive measure that is validated for the assessment of benefit:risk of psoriasis treatments, combining efficacy, quality of life, and safety measures. The objective of this analysis was to assess the benefit:risk of efalizumab, a novel biologic agent indicated for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, by applying the SPC to data from randomized, placebo-controlled clinical studies of efalizumab. METHODS: SPC was applied to week 12 data from four placebo-controlled, Phase III studies: three retrospective and one prospective, the latter including a cohort of "high-need" patients for whom existing therapies were inadequate or unsuitable. RESULTS: In the retrospective analysis, 39.4% of patients achieved SPC after 12 weeks of treatment with efalizumab, compared with 10.4% for placebo. In the prospective analysis, 34.3% of patients achieved SPC after 12 weeks of treatment with efalizumab, compared with 7.3% on placebo. Among high-need patients, 33.0% achieved SPC, compared with 3.4% on placebo. CONCLUSION: Efalizumab has a favorable benefit:risk profile using the comprehensive outcome measure SPC.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

The long-term efficacy and safety of new biological therapies for psoriasis.

Long-term therapy is often required for psoriasis. This article reviews the most recent long-term clinical data for biological agents that have been approved or for which late-stage development data have been released for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Efficacy data are available for up to five 12-week courses of alefacept (approximately 60 weeks of therapy), 36 months (144 weeks) of continuous efalizumab, 48 weeks of continuous etanercept, and 50 weeks of bimonthly infliximab. Data sources include publications, product labeling, and posters presented at recent international scientific meetings. Alefacept appears to continue to be efficacious over multiple treatment courses for some responsive patients. The efficacy of efalizumab achieved during the first 12-24 weeks of therapy appears to be maintained or improved through at least 60 weeks of continuous treatment. The efficacy of etanercept appears to be maintained through at least 48 weeks of continuous treatment. Infliximab demonstrates a high response rate soon after initiation, which appears to be maintained through 24 weeks but declines modestly with therapy out to 50 weeks. After 48 weeks, approximately 60% of efalizumab-treated and 45% of etanercept-treated patients remaining on therapy achieved > or =75% improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, as did 70.5% of infliximab patients who did not miss more than two infusions. Safety data suggest that these agents may be used for long-term administration. Long-term data from psoriasis trials continue to accumulate. Recent data suggest that biological therapies have efficacy and safety profiles suitable for the long-term treatment of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis.

Dermatologic Agents↗
PubMed2006

A favourable benefit/risk ratio with efalizumab: a review of the clinical evidence.

Moderate to severe plaque psoriasis has traditionally been treated with agents that have toxicities associated with long-term use. Many patients therefore cannot be treated safely, conveniently or effectively with traditional therapies. Recent phase 3 clinical trials for efalizumab, a biological agent targeted specifically at the T-cell-based pathology of psoriasis, have demonstrated its short- and long-term efficacy and safety for the treatment of psoriasis. This article reviews results from 12-week, six-month, and three-year trials, focusing on the drug's safety, efficacy, and therapeutic response time, as well as the phenomenon of rebound in non-responding patients. Efalizumab emerges as an important addition to the dermatological pharmacopeia for the long-term treatment of psoriasis.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed2006

Recommendations for incorporating biologicals into management of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: individualized patient approaches.

Psoriasis is a T-cell mediated skin disease that affects approximately 2% of the population worldwide. Despite the prevalence of the disease and long-standing efforts to develop strategies to treat it, there is a need for safe and effective therapies to treat psoriasis, particularly the more severe forms. Biological agents such as alefacept, efalizumab, etanercept, and infliximab have been recognized as a class of treatment distinct from other forms of therapy in the treatment algorithm of psoriasis. Recent national and international consensus meetings have developed statements that position biological agents as an important addition to the treatment armamentarium for moderate to severe psoriasis, along with phototherapy and traditional systemic agents. There has been consensus that treatment should be individualized to each patient's needs and circumstances. Biological agents offer the hope of safe, effective, long-term management of moderate to severe psoriasis. As new agents receive approval from Health Canada, the available range of therapeutic options for treating this chronic disease will broaden. A Canadian Psoriasis Expert Panel recently convened in February 2005 to analyze, based on a series of clinical case scenarios, the indications, contraindications, and considerations for and against each of the four biological agents, derived from product labelling, where available, and from the efficacy and safety data from phase 3 and earlier clinical trials, as well as post-marketing reports. The Panel has formulated a set of recommendations for incorporating these biological agents into the current treatment paradigm of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis and has identified the preferred biological agents for each patient based on individual needs and circumstances.

Alefacept↗
PubMed2006

Strategies for optimizing treatment with efalizumab in moderate to severe psoriasis.

With the advent of biological therapies for the treatment of plaque psoriasis, guidance on the usage of these new agents has become necessary. One such agent, efalizumab, a humanized recombinant monoclonal IgG(1) antibody developed to target T-cell-mediated inflammation, provides rapid and sustained efficacy for many psoriasis patients. This article explores the pretreatment, initiation, and treatment phases with efalizumab therapy. In the pretreatment phase, physicians need to assess patients' disease state and educate them about the course of efalizumab treatment. Prior to initiation, physicians need to establish stable disease, ensure an adequate transition or washout of any prior psoriasis therapeutics, and obtain baseline platelet counts. After initiating treatment, both physician and patient must participate in disease monitoring. Patients responding favourably may receive continuous treatment. Those who do not respond to the drug or who experience adverse events should be managed appropriately in order to continue therapy or be transitioned onto another agent. A growing body of clinical evidence, as well as experience from clinical investigators, has provided much insight into the management strategies for patients undergoing treatment with efalizumab.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2006

Efalizumab retreatment in patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Efalizumab targets T cell-mediated steps important in psoriasis immunopathogenesis. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of efalizumab retreatment in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS: In this open-label, phase III study, 365 patients who received efalizumab therapy during an earlier clinical trial were retreated with 12 weeks of subcutaneous efalizumab (1 mg/kg/wk) 35 days or more after their last dose of efalizumab. RESULTS: After 12 weeks of efalizumab retreatment, 56.9% of patients achieved 50% or more improvement from baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and 25.3% achieved at least 75% reduction in PASI score. The mean percentage PASI improvement from baseline was 51.2%. Overall, 76.1% of patients surveyed were "very satisfied" or "satisfied" with the efficacy of efalizumab. The safety profile of efalizumab retreatment was similar to that observed in patients receiving efalizumab for the first time. LIMITATIONS: Not all patients received sufficient exposure to efalizumab during their previous efalizumab clinical trial to allow for determination of their initial response to efalizumab. Of 365 patients enrolled in the study, 282 received at least 12 weeks of prior efalizumab therapy; of these patients, 208 (73.8%) achieved a PASI-50 response from their previous therapy. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that retreatment with efalizumab therapy is an efficacious option for patients who have previously discontinued treatment.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Safety of efalizumab in adults with chronic moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: a phase IIIb, randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: To provide safety data for efalizumab, a recombinant humanized monoclonal IgG(1) antibody, in adults with chronic plaque psoriasis. METHODS: A 12-week, Phase IIIb, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial. At 58 study sites in the USA and Canada, 686 patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis received an initial conditioning dose of efalizumab 0.7 mg/kg subcutaneously (SC) followed by either 11 weekly doses of efalizumab 1 mg/kg SC or matching placebo. Main outcome measures were safety and tolerability outcomes (primary) and efficacy outcomes (secondary). RESULTS: During 12 weeks of therapy with efalizumab or placebo, the incidence of clinical adverse events was 82.2% and 72.9%, respectively; the incidence of serious adverse events was 1.8% and 3.4%, respectively; and the incidence of nonserious adverse events leading to withdrawal was 1.8% and 1.7%, respectively. In the efalizumab group, there were no clinically significant changes in vital signs or laboratory parameters and no evidence of end-organ toxicities. A significantly higher proportion of patients receiving efalizumab than those receiving placebo achieved > or = 75% improvement in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) (P < 0.001), > or = 50% improvement in PASI (P < 0.001), and a static Physician's Global Assessment rating of Minimal or Clear (P < 0.001). The mean improvement in the Psoriasis Symptom Assessment was significantly greater in the efalizumab group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Efalizumab treatment SC for 12 weeks was safe, well tolerated, and effective in patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Safety and tolerability of 1% pimecrolimus cream among infants: experience with 1133 patients treated for up to 2 years.

Pimecrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor developed for the topical treatment of atopic dermatitis. During the clinical development of 1% pimecrolimus cream, 1133 patients 3 to 23 months of age with mild to severe atopic dermatitis were treated for up to 2 years. The objective of this review is to discuss the safety and tolerability of 1% pimecrolimus cream among infants, on the basis of the combined results from all studies (4 pharmacokinetic studies and 6 clinical trials) conducted among these patients. Pimecrolimus blood concentrations measured for 35 patients were consistently low (< or =1 ng/mL in >80% of samples), irrespective of the disease severity and extent, and remained low during intermittent treatment for up to 1 year. The level of systemic exposure to pimecrolimus among infants was comparable to that observed for older pediatric patients enrolled in the same studies and treated in the same way with 1% pimecrolimus cream, which indicated that young pediatric patients are not at higher risk of significant percutaneous absorption of topically applied pimecrolimus, despite their large skin surface area/body mass ratio. The 6 clinical trials included a total of 1098 infants, who were treated for periods ranging from 4 weeks to 2 years. Most of these patients (60%) had moderate to severe disease at baseline. The most frequently reported adverse events were common childhood disorders such as nasopharyngitis, pyrexia, upper respiratory tract infections, ear infections, and bronchitis. During the double-blind (DB) studies or DB phases of studies, the incidence rates for the most frequently reported adverse events were similar for patients who received 1% pimecrolimus cream and patients who received the vehicle, except for the incidence of teething, which was higher among the pimecrolimus-treated infants (relative risk: 2.02; 95% confidence interval: 1.32-3.27). Treatment with 1% pimecrolimus cream was not associated with an increase in the overall incidence of nonskin infections, compared with the vehicle (relative risk: 1.015; 95% confidence interval: 0.88-1.18). The incidence density (ID) rates for total bacterial, fungal, parasitic, and viral skin infections during the DB studies or DB phases of studies were comparable for patients treated with 1% pimecrolimus cream and patients who received the vehicle. The ID rate of herpes simplex virus infections was 0.8 cases per 1000 patient-months of follow-up monitoring among patients treated with 1% pimecrolimus cream and 1.7 cases per 1000 patient-months of follow-up monitoring among patients who received the vehicle. Considering all 1098 infants treated with 1% pimecrolimus cream in DB trials and open-label studies, the ID rate of clinically diagnosed eczema herpeticum was 1.3 cases per 1000 patient-months of follow-up monitoring. Burning and erythema were the most frequently reported application site reactions, with ID rates of 2.0 and 1.2 cases per 1000 patient-months of follow-up monitoring, respectively. No sign of immunosuppression was found among infants treated intermittently with 1% pimecrolimus cream for up to 2 years; they demonstrated normal immune responses to vaccinations and did not show increases in the incidence of systemic infections or skin infections over time.

Calcineurin Inhibitors↗
PubMed2005

Clinical efficacy of efalizumab in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis: results from three randomized placebo-controlled Phase III trials: part I.

BACKGROUND: Effective psoriasis therapies are needed for long-term symptom control. OBJECTIVE: Assess efalizumab (Raptiva) efficacy in a large cohort of psoriasis patients. METHODS: Data from three Phase III, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, multicenter studies were pooled. Patients (n = 1,651) with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis received 12 weeks of subcutaneous efalizumab 1 or 2 mg/kg/wk or placebo. RESULTS: All efficacy measures reached statistical significance within each of the individual studies (p < 0.001) and overall. More efalizumab-treated patients achieved > or = 75% and > or = 50% Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) improvement at week 12 than did placebo-treated patients (27.8% vs 3.8% [p < 0.001] and 56.1% vs 14.6% [p < 0.001], respectively). Significant PASI improvements occurred as early as week 2 (12.5% vs 7.9%, p =0.0001). Adverse events were generally mild to moderate. CONCLUSION: Efalizumab resulted in early and significant improvement for all efficacy endpoints and was well tolerated in patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Safety of efalizumab in patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis: review of clinical data. part II.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of efalizumab have been evaluated in multiple clinical trials. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the safety profile of efalizumab during the clinical trials. METHODS: Twelve-week data from four placebo-controlled trials were pooled and analyzed. Data from patients receiving 13-60 weeks of efalizumab therapy were pooled to evaluate longer-term safety. RESULTS: The most common adverse events were mild to moderate, self-limiting, flu-like symptoms that were most frequent following the first two efalizumab doses; by the third dose the incidence was comparable to placebo. Serious adverse events were observed in 2.2% and 1.7% of efalizumab- and placebo-treated patients, respectively. Nonserious adverse events leading to withdrawal were infrequent and similar to placebo (2.8% vs 1.8%). There does not appear to be increased risk of end-organ toxicity, infection, or malignancy in efalizumab-treated patients. CONCLUSION: Efalizumab was well tolerated, with a favorable safety profile.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Safe psoriasis control: a new outcome measure for the composite assessment of the efficacy and safety of psoriasis treatment.

BACKGROUND: PASI is an inadequate outcome measure for the assessment of psoriasis treatments. No currently used endpoints provide a benefit: risk assessment of treatment taking into consideration all available efficacy and safety data. OBJECTIVE: To propose a new outcome measure called "safe psoriasis control" (SPC), which assesses multiple dimensions of the disease in a clinically meaningful way through the combined use of appropriate efficacy, quality of life, and safety data. METHODS: Data from 3,500 subjects were used for the purpose of derivation and validation of the SPC endpoint. Advanced statistical methodology was used to evaluate and validate important components in the assessment of therapeutic benefit. RESULTS: SPC was shown to be a simple but meaningful combined endpoint showing the proportion of patients who had treatment benefit without major side effects. CONCLUSION: The SPC endpoint may be a step-forward in providing a composite tool for the evaluation of treatments for psoriasis.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed2005

Long-term treatment of atopic dermatitis with pimecrolimus cream 1% in infants does not interfere with the development of protective antibodies after vaccination.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether treatment of atopic dermatitis with pimecrolimus cream 1% in infants affects the development of a normal antibody response to vaccinations. METHODS: In all, 91 patients participated in a 1-year, open-label extension to a 1-year double-blind study: 76 used pimecrolimus twice daily at the first signs or symptoms of the disease until clearance for 2 years and 15 only in the second year. Serum concentrations of antibodies against tetanus, diphtheria, measles, and rubella were measured at months 18 and 24. RESULTS: The seropositivity rates of 93.6% for tetanus, 88.6% for diphtheria, 88.5% for measles, and 84.4% for rubella were comparable with those reported in literature. Seropositivity was not significantly affected by the use of pimecrolimus at the time of vaccinations (+/- 28 days). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of atopic dermatitis with pimecrolimus cream 1% in early childhood does not appear to interfere with the development of a normal immune response to vaccinations.

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMed2005

Long-term control of atopic dermatitis with pimecrolimus cream 1% in infants and young children: a two-year study.

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: The safety and efficacy of treatment with pimecrolimus cream 1% was evaluated for up to 2 years in infants and young children with atopic dermatitis. Ninety-one patients participated in a 1-year, open-label extension to a 1-year double-blind study. Of these, 76 received pimecrolimus for 2 years. Pimecrolimus was applied twice daily at the first signs or symptoms of the disease until clearance. Outcome measures included the incidence of adverse events and the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI). RESULTS: No patient discontinued because of adverse events. The incidence of systemic and skin infections did not increase over time. Over the 2-year period, 2 patients experienced an episode of clinically diagnosed eczema herpeticum. In patients receiving pimecrolimus for 2 years, the mean decrease in EASI score from baseline was 68.7% at 3 months and 70.8% at 24 months. CONCLUSION: Treatment with pimecrolimus cream 1% for up to 2 years was well tolerated and resulted in a marked and sustained improvement of atopic dermatitis.

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMed2005

Extended efalizumab therapy improves chronic plaque psoriasis: results from a randomized phase III trial.

BACKGROUND: Efalizumab inhibits multiple T-cell-mediated processes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate 12- and 24-week efalizumab therapy for psoriasis. METHODS: In this phase III, randomized, double-blind trial, 498 patients received subcutaneous 1 or 2 mg/kg/wk efalizumab or placebo for 12 weeks. Efalizumab-treated patients who achieved <75% Psoriasis Area and Severity Index improvement (PASI-75) were re-randomized to a second 12-week course of treatment. Results At week 12, 39% and 27% of efalizumab-treated patients (1 and 2 mg/kg, respectively) achieved PASI-75 (vs 2% placebo; P < .001, both dose groups). At week 24, an additional 20% of efalizumab-treated patients achieved PASI-75 (vs placebo 7%, P = .018). Efalizumab was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Twelve-week efalizumab treatment resulted in significant improvement; extension of therapy to 24 weeks resulted in additional improvement in patients who initially had not achieved PASI-75. There were no significant changes in safety profile during weeks 13-24.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Efalizumab: Advancing psoriasis management with a novel, targeted T-cell modulator.

Recent research has demonstrated that psoriasis is not the result of a keratinocyte disorder, as previously believed. Although the exact etiology has not been clearly defined, much data has accumulated to elucidate the role of the immune system, particularly T lymphocytes, in the pathogenesis of the disease. With this knowledge, a number of biologic therapies that specifically target key pathogenic events have been developed. Efalizumab, a recombinant humanized monoclonal IgG1 antibody, is a T-cell modulator approved for patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis. This article reviews the role of T lymphocytes in psoriasis pathogenesis, the mechanism of efalizumab action, and the efficacy and safety data observed during the efalizumab clinical trials.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Etanercept in psoriasis.

Psoriasis is a chronic skin disorder that affects approximately 2% of the US and European populations. Several lines of evidence have demonstrated the correlation between elevated levels of TNF and psoriasis, suggesting that interfering with the inflammatory effects of TNF may help resolve psoriatic lesions. The biological agent, etanercept, is a fully human soluble TNF-receptor fusion protein with proven efficacy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, and psoriatic arthritis. In several well-controlled clinical trials, etanercept showed sustained efficacy in reducing the signs and symptoms of psoriasis in patients with moderate-to-severe disease. With the exception of injection site reactions, adverse event rates were similar to placebo and did not increase across higher doses. No opportunistic infections, including tuberculosis, were reported. From analysis of the available clinical trials, etanercept appears to be an effective and well-tolerated agent for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗