PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Kimberly Fuller

Publications and source records attributed to Kimberly Fuller.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Clinically significant changes in nausea as measured on a visual analog scale.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Our objective is to determine the minimum clinically significant change in nausea as measured on a visual analog scale. METHODS: This was a prospective, descriptive, convenience sample study of consenting adults presenting to the emergency department with nausea, excluding intoxicated patients and those with mild nausea (measuring <30 mm on a visual analog scale). Patients rated their nausea severity on a 100-mm visual analog scale and reported whether their nausea was "a lot less," "a little less," "unchanged," "a little more," or "a lot more" compared with previous assessments. We defined the minimum clinically significant change as the mean difference in visual analog scale in patients reporting "a little less" or "a little more" nausea. RESULTS: Eighty-three paired visual analog scale measurements were collected from 50 patients. Fifty-eight percent of patients were women, and the mean age was 41 years. Mean changes in visual analog scale with corresponding qualitative descriptors were "a lot less" in 16 paired measurements (-42.2 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI] -54.9 to -29.5); "a little less" in 34 paired measurements (-15.4 mm; 95% CI -20.0 to -10.8); "no change" in 28 paired measurements (-0.4 mm; 95% CI -5.6 to 4.8); "a little more" in 2 paired measurements (16 mm; 95% CI -86 to 118); and "a lot more" in 3 paired measurements (23.7 mm; 95% CI -5.4 to 52.8). Patients reported "a little more" or "a little less" nausea in 36 paired measurements, with a mean change in visual analog scale of 15.4 mm (95% CI 11.0 to 19.8). CONCLUSION: The minimum clinically significant visual analog scale change in nausea was 15 mm, which is similar to previous studies of other symptoms, and helps in the interpretation of clinical studies reporting changes in nausea.

Adolescent↗

Through the looking glass: 21st century trauma registry innovations.

Trauma registries can be invaluable tools for improving quality of care and monitoring patient outcomes, but many function below their full potential. Reliance on low-tech, manual data management methods, such as the retyping of demographic information, can lead to inefficiency, increased personnel costs, and potential error. One low-cost solution is a digital interface between the medical records coding database and the trauma registry, allowing the registrar to pull demographic information and ICD-9 diagnostic and procedure codes directly from a reliable source without re-keying them. We created a batch interface for that purpose, reducing the burden of manual data entry and decreasing the time needed to complete patient records in the registry. The interface has eliminated our backlog and allowed the trauma registrar to focus on creating timely reports to track quality indicators.

Bias↗