Biomedical subjects

Kirsten J Lund

Publications and source records attributed to Kirsten J Lund.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

A multicenter study to determine motivating factors for residents pursuing obstetrics and gynecology.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine why residents choose obstetrics and gynecology. STUDY DESIGN: Applicants to obstetrics and gynecology residency programs were surveyed; a 5-point scale (5 = most important) was used to rate various aspects of the specialty. Univariate statistics were performed. Bivariate analysis comparing results that were based on gender and timing of decisions was completed with Student t test, chi2, and Kruskal-Wallis tests. RESULTS: A total of 153 applicants (42% response rate) from 10 programs participated; 85.3% of respondents were female. Surgical opportunities, variety of clinical experience, and fast-paced/high-acuity experiences attract applicants to obstetrics and gynecology. When considering programs, resident camaraderie, gynecologic experience, and commitment to education were most important. Over 70% of residents decided to pursue obstetrics and gynecology during or after their third-year clerkship. CONCLUSION: Surgical opportunities and clinical variety appeal to applicants. The majority choose obstetrics and gynecology during or after their core clerkship. In addition, program dynamics are important when choosing a residency.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Resident job satisfaction: one year of duty hours.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to assess job satisfaction and quality of life aspects among residents in obstetrics/gynecology before and after the implementation of duty-hour requirements. STUDY DESIGN: We administered a survey to residents before and after duty-hour restrictions, addressing satisfaction with residency training, quality of life, and predictions/impressions of the effect of reduced work hours. RESULTS: Satisfaction with overall residency training as a discrete survey item did not change; however, the composite score from all responses to specific items increased. Several specific clinical and academic items garnered higher satisfaction scores in 2004. Residents reported less-than-anticipated increases in healthiness of their lifestyle and a decrease in interest in teaching. CONCLUSION: This is a prospective assessment of the effect of duty-hour requirements, improvements in residents' perception of their time and ability to study and pursue research and in clinical areas are encouraging. The perception that there is less interest in teaching is of concern.

Female↗

PubMed2004

Resident job satisfaction: will 80 hours make a difference?

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to assess job satisfaction and quality of life among obstetrics and gynecology residents before the 80-hour work week. STUDY DESIGN: We administered a job satisfaction survey to residents before July 1, 2003, assessing satisfaction with residency training, indicators of current quality of life, and predictions for the effect of reduced work hours. RESULTS: Residents were satisfied with training, with important outliers, including leisure time, ability to pursue educational reading, and surgical experience. We created job satisfaction facets that were generally reliable constructs and valid predictors for overall residency satisfaction. Residents predict more free time and a healthier lifestyle under the new requirements, but do not anticipate using additional time to study or teach. CONCLUSION: Job satisfaction facets for residents are proposed here and may be refined through further study. Lower scores for surgical experience are of concern in light of decreasing work hours. Educators must monitor self-directed learning efforts under new work hours.

Adult↗