Kiyasettin Asil | PubMed Health

PubMed2004

Assessment of image quality of a standard and three dose-reducing protocols in adult cranial CT.

The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of various tube current settings (mAs) and optimize the image quality and dose for adult cranial CT protocol. Sixty adult patients who underwent a cranial CT scanning for different indications were subdivided into three subgroups. Subjective image and noise quality scores and quantitative noise measurements were selectively studied on three reference levels (cerebellar, basal ganglia and centrum semiovale levels). For each subgroup, only one level was studied. Head circumference (HC) and the maximum anteroposterior diameter (MAPD) of each patient were measured. At 50% decreased dose protocol, there was no poor quality score at any level. At nearly 60% decreased dose protocol, the incidence of poor quality scores was much higher at the cerebellar level than at the other two levels. For the same protocol number, quantitative noise measurements were higher at the cerebellar level than the other two supratentorial levels. The correlation was found to be significant between HC, MAPD and quantitative noise measurements, and there was a non-significant correlation between HC and subjective noise scores. In adult cranial CT, depending on the level, a dose reduction of up to 60% may be possible while maintaining image quality.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

[Venous reflux: Measurement variability due to positional differences].

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of the subject's position and two different maneuvers in the reflux measurements in femoral veins. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Venous reflux times in the common femoral vein (CFV) and superficial femoral vein (SFV) were studied in 50 healthy subjects (25 women, 25 male) aged between 22-57 years-old while the subjects were in supine and standing positions. Reflux was provocated only by Valsalva maneuver (VM) when the subject was lying down, whereas it was provocated by (1) Valsalva maneuver and (2) compression and release maneuver, respectively, when the subject was standing. Reflux times were recorded with each of the three methods. RESULTS: Regarding CFV, a reflux time of 1 second or more was recorded in 29 limbs (29%) only in the supine position. Of these 29 measurements, 19 were between 1 and 1.9 sec and 8 between 2 and 2.9 sec. When the subjects were examined in the standing position, the prevalence of reflux lasting more than 1 sec substantially decreased (5%). The prevalence of reflux lasting less than 0.5 sec was 97% with standing compression maneuver, 84% with standing VM and 27% with supine VM. Similarly, prevalence of reflux of longer than 0.5 sec or 1 sec was lower in the standing position than in the supine position in SFV. In CFV, mean reflux time was 1.3 sec in the supine position, whereas it was 0.7 sec and 0.4 sec with standing compression and standing Valsalva maneuvers, respectively. Corresponding values in SFV were 0.5 sec, 0.3 sec and 0.2 sec, respectively. CONCLUSION: The probability of making a false positive diagnosis of pathological reflux is high with supine examinations. When an examination in the supine position reveals a reflux time of longer than 1 second, making the patient stand up is expected to yield more reliable results. Compression and release maneuver, with its lowest false positive reflux prevalence, is the most reliable method in the evaluation of venous insufficiency.

Adult↗