[Program for evaluation of patient care with acupuncture--the scientific comparison of models and results].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Acupuncture Therapy↗
Biomedical subjects
Klaus Linde
Publications and source records attributed to Klaus Linde.
A critical overview of homeopathy.
Homeopathy is a 200-year-old therapeutic system that uses small doses of various substances to stimulate autoregulatory and self-healing processes. Homeopathy selects substances by matching a patient's symptoms with symptoms produced by these substances in healthy individuals. Medicines are prepared by serial dilution and shaking, which proponents claim imprints information into water. Although many conventional physicians find such notions implausible, homeopathy had a prominent place in 19th-century health care and has recently undergone a worldwide revival. In the United States, patients who seek homeopathic care are more affluent and younger and more often seek treatment for subjective symptoms than those who seek conventional care. Homeopathic remedies were allowed by the 1939 Pure Food and Drug Act and are available over the counter. Some data--both from randomized, controlled trials and laboratory research--show effects from homeopathic remedies that contradict the contemporary rational basis of medicine. Three independent systematic reviews of placebo-controlled trials on homeopathy reported that its effects seem to be more than placebo, and one review found its effects consistent with placebo. There is also evidence from randomized, controlled trials that homeopathy may be effective for the treatment of influenza, allergies, postoperative ileus, and childhood diarrhea. Evidence suggests that homeopathy is ineffective for migraine, delayed-onset muscle soreness, and influenza prevention. There is a lack of conclusive evidence on the effectiveness of homeopathy for most conditions. Homeopathy deserves an open-minded opportunity to demonstrate its value by using evidence-based principles, but it should not be substituted for proven therapies.
Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic↗
"Quality profiling" for complementary medicine: the example of a hospital for traditional Chinese medicine.
OBJECTIVE: The goal of the methodological approach of "quality profiling" for complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is to offer an empirical database that would enable different participants in the health care system to evaluate the quality of a medical provider. METHODS: Quality profiling is a structured way of describing quality on the levels of infra-structure, patients, medical interventions, outcomes, and quality assurance related to one specific provider. As part of a program called "quality management and research," this type of profiling constitutes one basic step for generating knowledge in terms of evidence-based medicine as well as confidence-based medicine. Quality profiling is exemplified by a hospital for Traditional Chinese Medicine in Germany. Within 1 year all in-patients were included in the database using questionnaires for physicians and patients at the time of admission, discharge from the hospital, and follow-up inquiries at intervals up to 1 year after discharge. The frequency of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions was recorded daily. RESULTS: Data for 1036 patients (mean age 53 years old, 73% female) were analyzed. The most frequent diagnostic categories were musculoskeletal disorders (30%) and neurologic disorders (26%). Therapeutic effects were shown in various outcome measures such as reduced intensity of complaints, improved quality of life, increased satisfaction in lifestyle areas, and fewer days off work. In 6.5% of the subjects, adverse events (mostly of minor severity) were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Quality profiles can serve as a basic tool for evaluating provider quality when the results are compared with either a predefined standard or with profiles of other providers who are offering similar medical services.
Adult↗
How objective are systematic reviews? Differences between reviews on complementary medicine.
Systematic reviews are considered the most reliable tool to summarize existing evidence. To determine whether reviews that address the same questions can produce different answers we examined systematic reviews of herbal medicine, homeopathy, and acupuncture taken from a previously established database. Information on literature searching, inclusion criteria, selection process, quality assessment, data extraction, methods to summarize primary studies, number of included studies, results and conclusions was compared qualitatively. Seventeen topics (eight on acupuncture, six on herbal medicines, three on homeopathy) had been addressed by 2-5 systematic reviews each. The number of primary studies in the reviews varied greatly within most topics. The most obvious reason for discrepancies between the samples was different inclusion criteria (in thirteen topics). Methods of literature searching may have contributed with some topics but the equivalence of the searches was difficult to assess. Differences were frequently observed in other methodological aspects, in results and in conclusions. This analysis shows that, at least in the three areas examined, systematic reviews often differ considerably. Readers should be aware that apparently minor decisions in the review process can have major impact.
Clinical Trials as Topic↗
Polysaccharides isolated from Echinacea purpurea herba cell cultures to counteract undesired effects of chemotherapy--a pilot study.
In an open prospective study with matched historical controls we aimed to evaluate whether a polysaccharide fraction isolated from the herb Echinacea purpurea could counteract the undesired effects of chemotherapy. Fifteen patients with advanced gastric cancer undergoing palliative chemotherapy with etoposide, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (ELF) received for 10 days (beginning 3 days before chemotherapy) daily i.v. injections of 2 mg of a polysaccharide fraction isolated from Echinacea purpurea herb cell cultures (EPS-EPO VIIa). The median number of leukocytes 14-16 days after chemotherapy was 3630/microL (range 1470-5770) in the patients receiving EPS-EPO VIIa compared with 2370/microL (870-3950) in the patients of the historical control group (p = 0.015). EPS-EPO VIIa had no clinically relevant effects on phagocytic activity of granulocytes or on lymphocyte subpopulations. Sixty-eight adverse events including two deaths were observed, most likely due to chemotherapy and the general condition of the patients. However, an association with the test intervention cannot be ruled out completely. The results of this pilot study suggest that EPS-EPO VIIa might be effective in reducing chemotherapy-induced leukopenia. The efficacy and safety should be investigated in further studies.
Adult↗
Should systematic reviews include non-randomized and uncontrolled studies? The case of acupuncture for chronic headache.
We aimed to investigate: (1) whether patient and intervention characteristics, design-independent quality aspects, and response rates differ between randomized and non-randomized trials of acupuncture for chronic headache; (2) whether non-randomized studies provide useful additional information (regarding long-term effects, prognostic factors, adverse effects, and generalizability); (3) reasons for potential differences in response rates. Studies including at least five patients and reporting clinical outcome data were identified through searches in Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, other databases and checking of bibliographies. Twenty-four randomized trials and 35 non-randomized studies (five non-randomized controlled cohort studies, 10 prospective uncontrolled studies, 10 case series, and 10 cross-sectional surveys) met the inclusion criteria. Studies were heterogeneous regarding patients, interventions, outcome measurements and results. On average, randomized trials had smaller sample sizes, met more quality criteria, and had lower response rates (0.59 [95% confidence interval 0.48-0.69] vs. 0.78 [0.72-0.83]). Whether randomized or not, studies meeting more quality criteria had lower response rates. Non-randomized studies did not have significantly longer follow-up periods, three included an analysis of prognostic variables, only one reported on adverse effects, and the degree of generalizability was unclear. In the case of acupuncture for chronic headache, non-randomized studies confirmed the finding of a systematic review of randomized trials that the treatment is likely to be effective but provided little relevant additional information on long-term effects, prognostic factors, and adverse effects.
Acupuncture↗
Integrating patient preferences in clinical trials: a pilot study of acupuncture versus midazolam for gastroscopy.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patient preferences play an important role when choosing between different treatment options and may have an influence on outcome. We performed a study to investigate (1) to what extent patients make use of the offer to receive acupuncture as a pretreatment for gastroscopy, (2) whether this is perceived as being as effective as sedation, and (3) whether characteristics and outcomes differ between patients giving consent to random allocation and patients choosing their pretreatment. DESIGN: Partially randomized patient preference trial. Patients who gave consent to randomization were allocated randomly while patients who had a preference received the treatment of their choice. PATIENTS: One hundred and six (106) inpatients of a district hospital in southern Germany undergoing gastroscopy for diagnostic purposes. INTERVENTIONS: Pretreatment with a sedative (midazolam) or acupuncture. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Patient's overall assessment on a visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS: Twenty-eight (28) patients (26%) agreed to be randomized, 21 (20%) chose acupuncture, 51 (47%) midazolam, and 8 (7%) did not want pretreatment. Patients receiving midazolam rated the examination as slightly less troublesome than those receiving acupuncture. Oxygen saturation, blood pressure, and heart rate were significantly lower in patients receiving midazolam. Characteristics and outcomes of randomized and nonrandomized patients did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the low number of patients giving consent to random allocation conclusions on effectiveness are difficult to draw. The partially randomized patient preference design is recommended for use in future trials of acupuncture for gastroscopy. Such trials should be performed in an outpatient setting.
Acupuncture Therapy↗
Treatment of patients with chronic headaches in a hospital for traditional Chinese medicine in Germany. A randomised, waiting list controlled trial.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of a clinical treatment program with traditional Chinese medicine for migraine and tension-type headache. METHODS: Ninety-one patients with migraine, episodic or chronic tension-type headache according to the criteria of the International Headache Society were randomised into an experimental or a waiting list control group. Patients in the experimental group were treated 4 weeks in a hospital for traditional Chinese medicine after a baseline period of one month. Patients in the waiting list group continued their previous headache treatment. Main outcome measure was the difference in the number of days with headache of at least moderate intensity during baseline (month 1) and month 7. RESULTS: The difference in the number of days with headache of at least moderate intensity was 5.6 (S.D., 6.1) days in the experimental group and 1.2 (S.D., 4.5) days in the waiting list group (P <0.001). A reduction of more than 50% in headache days was observed in 52% of the patients in the experimental group and 16% in the waiting list group. Patients with migraine and a combination of migraine and episodic tension-type headaches improved more than patients with other headaches. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that treatment in the hospital for traditional Chinese medicine in Kotzting is associated with lasting improvements in the majority of patients.
Acupuncture↗
Updating systematic reviews.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Acupuncture Therapy↗
Effectiveness and tolerability of acupuncture compared with metoprolol in migraine prophylaxis.
OBJECTIVES: In a randomized controlled multicenter trial extending over 24 weeks, we investigated whether acupuncture is as effective and safe as metoprolol in the prophylactic treatment of migraine under conditions similar to routine care. METHODS: One hundred fourteen migraine patients could be randomized to treatment over 12 weeks either with acupuncture (8 to 15 sessions) or metoprolol (100 to 200 mg daily). Main outcome measure was the difference in the number of migraine days between baseline and the weeks 9 to 12 after randomization (derived from a headache diary). RESULTS: Two of 59 patients randomized to acupuncture withdrew prematurely from the study compared to 18 of 55 randomized to metoprolol. The number of migraine days decreased by 2.5 +/- 2.9 days (baseline 5.8 +/- 2.5 days) in the acupuncture group compared to 2.2 +/- 2.7 days (baseline 5.8 +/- 2.9 days) in the metoprolol group (P= .721). The proportion of responders (reduction of migraine attacks by > or =50%) was 61% for acupuncture and 49% for metoprolol. Both physicians and patients reported fewer adverse effects in the acupuncture group. CONCLUSIONS: Due to missing the recruitment target (480 patients) and the high drop-out in the metoprolol group the results must be interpreted with caution. Still, they suggest that acupuncture might be an effective and safe treatment option for patients unwilling or unable to use drug prophylaxis.
Acupuncture↗
St John's wort and depression.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Major Depressive Disorder↗