PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

Klaus Pantel

Publications and source records attributed to Klaus Pantel.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Clinical Relevance of Post-Treatment Circulating Tumor DNA Detection in Early Breast Cancer Using a Tissue-Free Epigenomic Assay: A 2-Year Landmark Analysis.

PURPOSE: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may serve as a biomarker to facilitate early identification of asymptomatic distant tumor spread in patients with breast cancer. The primary objective of this study was to assess clinical validity and prognostic value of post-treatment tissue-free ctDNA detection by evaluating its sensitivity for distant metastatic recurrence and its association with long-term outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Plasma samples were prospectively collected from patients with stage I-III early breast cancer who participated in the adjuvant SUCCESS-A phase III clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02181101). In this study, plasma samples collected approximately 2 years after completion of adjuvant chemotherapy from 313 SUCCESS A patients without evidence of prior disease recurrence were retrospectively analyzed using a tissue-free epigenomic ctDNA assay (Guardant Reveal). Survival analyses were performed using a landmark approach based on the time of sample collection. RESULTS: Overall, ctDNA was detected in 18 of 313 samples (5.8%). Of all ctDNA detected samples, 94% (17/18) were from patients who subsequently developed a distant recurrence, with ctDNA detected at a median interval of 7.9 months before recurrence. ctDNA positivity was strongly associated with a significantly shorter distant recurrence-free interval (hazard ratio [HR], 33.3 [95% CI, 4.12 to 268]; P < .0001) and poorer overall survival (HR, 27.3 [95% CI, 1.15 to 647]; P < .0001). The sensitivity for distant recurrence in patients who had a sample collected within 1 year before recurrence was 73% (11/15). The specificity in nonrecurred patients was 99.6% (267/268). CONCLUSION: Tissue-free detection of ctDNA 2 years after adjuvant chemotherapy was highly prognostic in an early-stage breast cancer cohort, and can be used to stratify patients with early-stage breast cancer at high risk for recurrence during follow-up who may benefit from early interventions.

Humans

In-depth assessment of BRAF, NRAS, KRAS, EGFR, and PIK3CA mutations on cell-free DNA in the blood of melanoma patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibition.

INTRODUCTION: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) holds promise for guiding immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy and stratifying responders from non-responders. While tumor-informed ctDNA detection approaches are sensitive and mutation-inclusive, they require tumor tissue, which limits applicability in real-world settings. Conversely, tumor-agnostic methods often have limited genomic coverage. In this study, we evaluated a tumor-agnostic, broad-panel ctDNA assay in patients with advanced melanoma treated with ICI. METHODS: We conducted a prospective analysis of 241 longitudinal samples from 39 patients with unresectable stage III/IV melanoma using a SYSMEX targeted NGS panel covering 1,114 COSMIC mutations. Plasma samples were collected at baseline and during ICI therapy. The assay's sensitivity reached seven mutant molecules, corresponding to a 0.07% mutation allele frequency (MAF). ctDNA profiles were compared with matched tumor tissue and correlated with clinical features and survival. RESULTS: At baseline, ctDNA was detected in 64.5% of patients. Common mutations included BRAFV600E (43.8%) and NRASG12D (36.4%), followed by KRAS, EGFR, and PIK3CA variants. Overall tissue-plasma concordance was 51.6%, with more extended biopsy-plasma intervals associated with discordance (p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.0105). Notably, 12.2% of cases exhibited partial concordance, characterized by shared mutations and additional plasma-only alterations, underscoring the complementary value of blood-based profiling. Persistent or re-emerging ctDNA positivity post-therapy correlated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.003), while ctDNA-negative patients showed significantly improved outcomes. Patients that remained ctDNA-negative had significantly longer progression-free survival (median not reached) compared to those with persistent ctDNA positivity (median 3&#xa0;months) or those converting to positive (median 7.5&#xa0;months; p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.0073). Early NRAS and KRAS ctDNA levels strongly predicted poor response (p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.0069 and p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.028). The prognostic impact extended beyond canonical drivers, as non-hotspot variants also correlated with the outcome. Notably, even low-level ctDNA persistence (5-10 MM/mL) carried adverse prognostic implications (p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.0054). Concerning a shorter PFS, ctDNA positivity was also associated with elevated S100 levels (p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.047). Organ-specific mutation enrichment (e.g., KRASG12D in brain, EGFRG719A in lymph nodes) suggested possible metastatic tropism. CONCLUSION: Broad tumor-agnostic ctDNA analysis effectively identified clinically relevant mutations and predicted outcomes in ICI-treated melanoma patients. This approach enables tissue-independent and real-time ctDNA monitoring and may inform patient selection and therapeutic strategies in future interventional trials.

Humans