PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Koos Geleijns

Publications and source records attributed to Koos Geleijns.

3 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Atrial fibrillation: multi-detector row CT of pulmonary vein anatomy prior to radiofrequency catheter ablation--initial experience.

PURPOSE: To evaluate multi-detector row computed tomographic (CT) depiction of pulmonary veins to provide a road map for radiofrequency catheter ablation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For patients, institutional review board (IRB) approval was not required, and consent was obtained for treatment. Control subjects were part of an IRB-approved research protocol at the institution, in which they had consented to participate. Multi-detector row CT was performed in 23 patients (17 men, six women; mean age, 48 years +/- 11 [standard deviation]) with atrial fibrillation who were admitted for isolation of pulmonary veins by means of radiofrequency catheter ablation. Pulmonary vein anatomy was evaluated, and diameters of pulmonary vein ostia were measured. To determine the shape of ostia, a venous ostium index was calculated for all veins by dividing anterior-posterior measurements by superior-inferior measurements. Results were compared with those in a control group of 11 patients (eight men, three women; mean age, 56 years +/- 11) without atrial fibrillation. Images were evaluated by two observers in consensus. RESULTS: Pulmonary veins additional to the four main veins were found in seven (30%) of 23 patients. Common ostia of left and right pulmonary veins were detected in 19 (83%) and nine (39%) patients, respectively. Early branching occurred more often with right than with left veins (19 [83%] vs three [13%] cases, P <.05) in both patients and control subjects. Anterior-posterior diameter of ostia was 12.8 mm +/- 3.3 for left veins, 16.2 mm +/- 3.8 for right veins, and 18.8 mm +/- 7.7 and 28.7 mm +/- 5.1 for left and right common ostia, respectively. Ostia of right pulmonary veins were more round than were ostia of left pulmonary veins (venous ostium index in patients, 0.91 +/- 0.21 vs 0.75 +/- 0.17, P <.05; in control subjects, 0.93 +/- 0.12 vs 0.82 +/- 0.17, P <.05). The CT data were used to determine ablation strategy and guide catheters during radiofrequency ablation. CONCLUSION: Multi-detector row CT provides a valuable road map for pulmonary vein anatomy prior to radiofrequency catheter ablation. Variations in number and insertion of pulmonary veins were observed in a considerable number of patients and control subjects.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Marker Configuration Model-Based Roentgen Fluoroscopic Analysis.

It remains unknown if and how the polyethylene bearing in mobile bearing knees moves during dynamic activities with respect to the tibial base plate. Marker Configuration Model-Based Roentgen Fluoroscopic Analysis (MCM-based RFA) uses a marker configuration model of inserted tantalum markers in order to accurately estimate the pose of an implant or bone using single plane Roentgen images or fluoroscopic images. The goal of this study is to assess the accuracy of (MCM-Based RFA) in a standard fluoroscopic set-up using phantom experiments and to determine the error propagation with computer simulations. The experimental set-up of the phantom study was calibrated using a calibration box equipped with 600 tantalum markers, which corrected for image distortion and determined the focus position. In the computer simulation study the influence of image distortion, MC-model accuracy, focus position, the relative distance between MC-models and MC-model configuration on the accuracy of MCM-Based RFA were assessed. The phantom study established that the in-plane accuracy of MCM-Based RFA is 0.1 mm and the out-of-plane accuracy is 0.9 mm. The rotational accuracy is 0.1 degrees. A ninth-order polynomial model was used to correct for image distortion. Marker-Based RFA was estimated to have, in a worst case scenario, an in vivo translational accuracy of 0.14 mm (x-axis), 0.17 mm (y-axis), 1.9 mm (z-axis), respectively, and a rotational accuracy of 0.3 degrees. When using fluoroscopy to study kinematics, image distortion and the accuracy of models are important factors, which influence the accuracy of the measurements. MCM-Based RFA has the potential to be an accurate, clinically useful tool for studying kinematics after total joint replacement using standard equipment.

Arthroplasty, Replacement↗