PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Kyle R Wanzel

Publications and source records attributed to Kyle R Wanzel.

10 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2004

Laboratory based training in urological microsurgery with bench model simulators: a randomized controlled trial evaluating the durability of technical skill.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the durability of laboratory based technical skills training in urological microsurgery using bench model simulators. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 50 junior surgery residents (post-graduate years 1 to 3) were recruited to participate in a focused training program in urological microsurgery. Prior to training subjects were randomized to receive hands-on training with bench model simulators (silicone tubing or live rat vas deferens, 40) or didactic training alone (10). Four months following the original training program the technical performance of 18 returning subjects (13 from the bench model and 5 from the didactic training group) was reevaluated using a high fidelity, live animal model (vasovasostomy and rat vas deferens). Outcome measures included blinded, expert assessment of videotaped performance using checklists and global rating scores, and evaluation of anastomotic patency. RESULTS: The retention test checklist (p <0.001), global rating scores (p <0.001) and anastomotic patency rates (p = 0.05) in the live animal model remained significantly higher for subjects who originally received hands-on bench model training compared with those who received didactic training alone. The number of interim practice opportunities with microsurgery correlated significantly with expert global ratings of surgical performance irrespective of the nature of training (r = 0.54, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Laboratory based technical skills training with bench models can lead to a significant retention of technical skill by novice surgeons. Measured performance improvements appear to be durable with time. However, the opportunity for repeat hands-on practice appears to maximize the retention of technical skill.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

The educational impact of bench model fidelity on the acquisition of technical skill: the use of clinically relevant outcome measures.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of bench model fidelity on the acquisition of technical skill using clinically relevant outcome measures. METHODS: Fifty junior surgery residents participated in a 1-day microsurgical training course. Participants were randomized to 1 of 3 groups: 1) high-fidelity model training (live rat vas deferens; n = 21); 2) low-fidelity model training (silicone tubing; n = 19); or 3) didactic training alone (n = 10). Following training, all participants were assessed on the high- and low-fidelity bench models. Immediate outcome measures included procedure times, blinded, expert assessment of videotaped performance using checklists and global rating scales, anastomotic patency, suture placement precision, and final product ratings. Delayed outcome measures (obtained from the live rat vas deferens 30 days following training) included anastomotic patency, presence of a sperm granuloma, and the presence of sperm on microscopy. RESULTS: Following training, checklist (P < 0.001) and global rating scores (P < 0.001) on the bench model simulators were higher among subjects who received hands-on training, irrespective of model fidelity. Immediate anastomotic patency rates of the rat vas deferens were higher with increasing model fidelity training (P = 0.048). Delayed anastomotic patency rates were higher among subjects who received bench model training, irrespective of model fidelity (P = 0.02). Rates of sperm presence on microscopy were higher among subjects who received high-fidelity model training compared with subjects who received didactic training (P = 0.039) but did not differ among subjects in the high- and low-fidelity groups. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical skills training on low-fidelity bench models appears to be as effective as high-fidelity model training for the acquisition of technical skill among novice surgeons.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Validation of novel and objective measures of microsurgical skill: Hand-motion analysis and stereoscopic visual acuity.

Our purposes were: 1) to establish the predictive validity of stereoscopic visual acuity and microsurgical performance, and 2) to establish the construct and concurrent validity of hand-motion analysis as an objective and sensitive measure of microsurgical performance. Using a surgical microscope, 50 surgical residents completed a standardized microsurgical suturing task at baseline and following microsurgical training. Microsurgical performance was evaluated by blinded, expert microsurgeons using global rating scales. Measures of stereoscopic visual acuity and hand-motion analysis were correlated with expert global rating scores. Global rating scores correlated significantly with number of hand movements (r = -0.47, P = 0.001) and hand-travel distance (r = -0.37, P = 0.008). Economy of hand-motion improved significantly following microsurgical training (number of hand movements, P = 0.046; hand-travel distance, P = 0.04). Measures of stereoscopic visual acuity did not correlate significantly with global rating scores. Hand-motion analysis appears to be an objective and sensitive instrument for assessing microsurgical performance, with evidence of both concurrent and construct validity. The predictive validity of stereoscopic visual acuity and microsurgical performance remains unclear.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Evaluating the effectiveness of a 2-year curriculum in a surgical skills center.

BACKGROUND: This study was a formative evaluation of a 2-year Surgical Skills Center Curriculum (SSCC) using objective measures of surgical performance and self-reported process-oriented evaluations. METHODS: Fifty postgraduate third-year (PGY-3) residents participated in an Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) examination. Nineteen residents underwent the SSCC and 31 residents did not. During the SSCC, self-reported student and faculty evaluations were completed after each session. RESULTS: For the OSATS examination, scores were not significantly different between treatment and control groups, on either the checklist (66.4 +/- 6.1 versus 64.1 +/- 10.8) or global rating scale scores (66.9 +/- 6.9 versus 68.0 +/- 9.6). Further comparisons between groups on individual OSATS stations revealed no significant differences between groups. The majority of student and faculty evaluation remarks were highly positive. CONCLUSIONS: The OSATS results failed to support our hypothesis that training on a core procedure in a single session during a SSCC would have an appreciable and sustained effect after 2 years. Self-reported process-oriented evaluations support the utility of our SSCC.

Clinical Competence↗
PubMed2003

Visual-spatial ability correlates with efficiency of hand motion and successful surgical performance.

BACKGROUND: This study examines the influence of visual-spatial ability and manual dexterity on surgical performance across 3 levels of expertise. METHODS: Dental students, surgical residents, and staff surgeons completed standardized tests of manual dexterity and visual-spatial ability and were assessed objectively while performing the rigid fixation of an anterior mandible on bench model simulations. Outcome variables included expert assessment of technical performance and efficiency of hand motion during the procedure (recorded using electromagnetic sensors). RESULTS: Visual-spatial scores correlated significantly with surgical performance scores within the group of dental students (r=.40 to.73), but this was not the case for residents or staff surgeons. For all groups, manual dexterity did not correlate with hand motion parameters. There were no differences between groups in visual-spatial ability or manual dexterity, but highly significant differences were seen in surgical performance scores (P<.001), in that surgeons outperformed residents, who in turn outperformed students. CONCLUSIONS: Among novices, visual-spatial ability is associated with skilled performance on a spatially complex surgical procedure. However, advanced trainees and experts do not score any higher on carefully selected visual-spatial tests, suggesting that practice and surgical experience may supplant the influence of visual-spatial ability over time. Thus, the use of these tests for the selection of residents is not currently recommended; they may be of more use in identifying those novice trainees (ie, those with lower test scores) who might benefit most from brief supplementary instruction on specific technical tasks.

Clinical Competence↗
PubMed2003

Residency training in plastic surgery: a survey of educational goals.

With the advent of integrative plastic surgical training programs, requirements for earlier specialization decisions, and an increasing subspecialization within the practice of plastic surgery, the educational goals of residency training may have changed. The duration and extent of training required are also currently being questioned. This study was performed to better understand the necessary roles of plastic surgery residencies and to determine how these demands might optimally be met. Of 151 practicing plastic surgeons in the Ontario, Canada, region, 81 (53.6 percent) responded to a survey. General agreement was that 2 years was an optimal length of time for core surgical training, which should then be followed by at least 3 years of plastic surgical training. Opinions on the ideal length of time training in specific medical and surgical disciplines are discussed. Overall, respondents thought that two thirds of training should occur in tertiary care centers, with the remaining time spent at smaller community centers and private clinics. Nearly half of respondents thought that research training should be a mandatory part of the residency, although the amount of protected time for this activity varied substantially. Most thought that unrestricted elective time should also be available. Academic plastic surgeons rated the importance of research training (p < 0.01), critical appraisal skills (p < 0.05), and teaching skills (p < 0.05) as significantly more important than did their nonacademic colleagues. The authors present results from the Ontario region and a template for determining optimal characteristics for training programs. Further investigation may be of timely importance during a foreseeable future transition from traditional to integrative plastic surgery residency training.

Curriculum↗
PubMed2002

Effect of visual-spatial ability on learning of spatially-complex surgical skills.

Visual-spatial ability is thought to be important in competency in specific surgical procedures. To test this hypothesis, 37 surgical residents completed six tests of visual-spatial ability, ranging from low-level to high-level visual processing. Using previously validated and objective instruments, we then assessed their ability to complete and learn a spatially-complex surgical procedure. Residents with higher visual-spatial scores in the form-board test and the mental-rotations test did significantly better in the procedure than did those with lower scores. After practice and feedback, residents with lower scores achieved a comparable level of competency. Our results suggest that visual-spatial ability is related to competency and quality of results in complex surgery, and could potentially be used in resident selection, career counselling, and training.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Teaching technical skills: training on a simple, inexpensive, and portable model.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether surgical residents could significantly improve their performance on a specific surgical procedure after a brief practice session with feedback. Attending plastic surgeons, using valid and reliable checklists and global rating scales, objectively assessed 37 junior surgical residents while performing two-flap Z-plasties on pig thighs (one before and one after a one-on-one, 5-minute practice session with feedback). The total cost per resident was $1.00 (Canadian currency). After the practice session, total checklist scores improved from 7.3 (range, 1 to 9) to 7.9 (range, 5 to 9), and the total global rating scores improved from 29.1 (range, 13 to 41) to 31.9 (range, 19 to 43). Paired Student's t tests revealed significant improvement in both the mean total checklist scores (p < 0.05) and mean total global rating scores (p < 0.01). Also, the global rating score for appearance and quality of the final surgical product significantly improved from 2.7 to 3.3 after the practice session (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences in performance scores between men and women, between first-year and second-year residents, with residents' previous experience with the Z-plasty procedure, or with resident's base surgical specialties. The results of this prospective study indicate that training on a simple and portable model with very brief individualized practice and feedback is an effective and inexpensive way of improving resident performance. A 5-minute practice session with a surgical trainee before performing a procedure on a living patient may significantly improve the patient's surgical performance and produce a superior result.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Reconstructive breast surgery: referring physician knowledge and learning needs.

Despite the positive impact that reconstructive breast surgery can have on a woman's quality of life, the percentage of eligible candidates that have this procedure remains surprisingly low. The authors hypothesized that this may be attributable to inadequate knowledge, inadequate information, and/or misinformation available to physicians caring for these patients. A needs assessment of primary care physicians, general surgeons, oncologists, and plastic surgeons was conducted to determine referring physicians' current level of knowledge of reconstructive breast surgery and to discover potential learning needs. This comprised a survey, focus groups, and individual interviews. Referring physicians rated their own knowledge of reconstructive breast surgery as low. Plastic surgeons rated their referring physicians' knowledge as even lower. Specific learning needs were identified, as large discrepancies between referring physicians' self-reported knowledge of individual breast reconstruction topics and their own opinion of their relevance were revealed. In addition, despite evidence to the contrary, more than one-third of referring physicians indicated a belief that a breast reconstruction delayed the detection of local cancer recurrence and adversely interfered with adjuvant oncologic therapy. This lack of knowledge and misinformation may be negatively affecting patient referrals to plastic surgeons, as more than one-third of referring physicians and 90 percent of plastic surgeons believed that eligible candidates were not being offered referrals because of inadequate referring physician knowledge of this topic. Furthermore, patients older than 49 years were not being referred despite the fact that plastic surgeons would consider these patients as potential surgical candidates. Referring physician gender affected both referral patterns and perceived importance of reconstructive breast surgery. Finally, personal beliefs and past experiences played a role both in physicians' decisions to refer patients and in patients' decisions to have breast reconstructions. These deficiencies in information, knowledge, and learning needs should be addressed by educational interventions during residency training and through continuing education endeavors.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗