PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L A Blewett

Publications and source records attributed to L A Blewett.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

Measuring the direct costs of graduate medical education training in Minnesota.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the usefulness of self-reported cost-accounting data from the sponsors of training programs for estimating the direct costs of graduate medical education (GME). The study also assesses the relative contributions of resident, faculty, and administrative costs to primary care, surgery, and the combined programs of radiology, emergency medicine, anesthesiology, and pathology (REAP). METHOD: The data were the FY97 direct costs of clinical education reported to Minnesota's Department of Health by eight sponsors of 117 accredited medical education programs, representing 394 sites of training (both hospital- and community-based) and 2,084 full-time-equivalent trainees (both residents and fellows). Average costs of clinical training were calculated as residency, faculty, and administrative costs. Preliminary analysis showed average costs by type of training programs, comparing the cost components for surgery, primary care, and REAP. RESULTS: The average direct cost of clinical training in FY97 was $130,843. Faculty costs were 52%, resident costs were 26%, and administrative costs were 20% of the total. Primary care programs' average costs were lower than were those of either surgery or REAP programs, but proportionally they included more administrative costs. CONCLUSIONS: As policymakers assess government subsidies for GME, more detailed cost information will be required. Self-reported data are more cost-effective and efficient than are the more detailed and costly time-and-motion studies. This data-collection study also revealed that faculty costs, driven by faculty hours and base salaries, represent a higher proportion of direct costs of GME than studies have shown in the past.

Accounting↗

State health expenditure accounts: Minnesota's perspective.

Minnesota's approach to the development and use of State health expenditure accounts (SHEAs) was developed to assist State policymakers with decisions regarding health care reform. The accounts are based on an annual survey of third-party payers and summary Medicaid and Medicare data. Summary data are presented along with a discussion of data collection methodology, estimation, and dissemination. Minnesota's experience demonstrates that the ability of States to conduct detailed analysis of health care spending and to use these estimates to change State policy, inform national policy debate, conduct impact analysis, educate policymakers, and monitor market trends.

Accounting↗

Do rehabilitative nursing homes improve the outcomes of care?

OBJECTIVES: To compare the differences in outcomes of Medicare patients discharged from hospital to two types of nursing homes, rehabilitative and regular, and to rehabilitative facilities. DESIGN: Criteria for distinguishing rehabilitative nursing homes (RNHs) from ordinary nursing homes (NH), based on staffing criteria, were developed by an expert panel and validated on a national sample of nursing homes. Those criteria that significantly discriminated the two types of NHs were then applied to a sample of nursing homes from a study of the outcomes of care for more than 2500 Medicare patients to classify the nursing homes in which patients were discharged. Actual discharge outcomes were compared with optimal outcomes based of predictive equations for different types of treatment (ordinary NH care, RNH care, and formal rehabilitative care). PARTICIPANTS: Medicare patients with strokes an hip fractures discharged from 52 hospitals in three cities. MEASUREMENTS: A disability scale that weights components of ADL measures was used as the primary outcome indicator. Nursing homes were classified as rehabilitative on the basis of the extent of staffing in rehabilitative areas. RESULTS: Patients discharged to various types of care varied on several parameters. After adjusting for these differences, stroke patients fared better when treated in rehabilitative facilities; there was no substantial benefit for RNH care over NH care. Healthier hip fracture patients who received RNH care fared better, but functional change for sicker hip fracture patients was not different among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that at least a preliminary distinction among NHs can be made on the basis of staffing patterns and that the benefits of the additional staffing may vary with the problem under consideration. More work is needed to establish just what sorts of patients are most likely to benefit from the higher level of NH care.

APACHE↗

Quality assurance for a program of comprehensive care for older persons.

Quality assurance (QA) for comprehensive programs like the Program of All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) requires a special strategy. The assessment phase should be capable of looking across the usual subdivisions of care to recognize the contributions of various disciplines, and to focus on the effects of that care on the patient. Measures should thus include both problem-specific and patient-focused elements. The tracer technique which follows the care of specific problems provides an opportunity to look at both the process and outcomes of care. An outcomes focus which looks at patient functioning as well as condition-specific parameters can include specific sentinel events whose presence suggests untoward developments. Quality assurance implies more than assessment. It represents a commitment to act responsibly on the information obtained to improve the care rendered. It includes a strategy for proactive involvement where caregivers are prompted to consider pertinent information in a timely fashion, and a retrospective remedial approach where the data are analyzed and presented in a format that can be readily understood and which suggests next steps to improve care.

Aged↗

Hospital ownership of post-acute care: does it increase access to post-acute care services?

This study examines the relationship of hospital characteristics and access to post-acute care (PAC) using a comprehensive database that combines hospital characteristics with clinical and demographic information of patients. The data was drawn from 52 hospitals in three urban areas--Minneapolis/St. Paul, Houston, and Pittsburgh--and 2,572 patients within five diagnosis-related groups (DRGs). The analysis found hospital ownership of post-acute care significantly associated with use of PAC for patients discharged after hospitalization for stroke and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We found few significant hospital characteristics influencing use of PAC, but, as expected, for selected DRGs, patients were more likely to receive PAC if they were discharged from a hospital that either owned post-acute care or served a high proportion of Medicare patients. In general, patient characteristics were more consistent predictors of post-acute care use across the DRGs studied.

Activities of Daily Living↗