Biomedical subjects

L A Crowe

Publications and source records attributed to L A Crowe.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Inter-study reproducibility of 3D volume selective fast spin echo sequence for quantifying carotid artery wall volume in asymptomatic subjects.

PURPOSE: To determine, in asymptomatic subjects, the inter-study reproducibility of a three-dimensional (3D) volume selective fast spin echo (FSE) cardiovascular magnetic resonance sequence for the assessment of carotid artery wall volume as a measure of atheroma burden. METHODS: Inter-study reproducibility was evaluated in 16 asymptomatic volunteers (10 male, 6 female). Both carotid arteries were scanned twice with a median inter-scan time of 5 days. The images were acquired in cross-section, and the total carotid arterial wall volume (TWV) was calculated by subtraction of the total carotid lumen volume from the total outer carotid vessel volume. RESULTS: The mean carotid T1-weighted TWV for the first and second scans was 828 and 821 mm(3), respectively (mean difference 7 mm(3), p=0.45). The standard deviation (S.D.) of the differences between the measurements was 38 mm(3) yielding an inter-study coefficient of variation of 4.6%. The time for each study was approximately 30 min. For the longitudinal evaluation of carotid atheroma burden with pharmacological intervention versus placebo, 32 subjects would enable a difference of 38 mm(3) to be detected with a significance level of 5% with 80% power. CONCLUSION: Volumetric analysis with carotid CMR in asymptomatic subjects using a 3D volume-selective FSE is time-efficient with good inter-study reproducibility, and is well suited for longitudinal studies of carotid atheroma with reasonable sample sizes.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Image-based carotid flow reconstruction: a comparison between MRI and ultrasound.

Atherosclerosis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Its apparent link with wall shear stress (WSS) has led to considerable interest in the in vivo estimation of WSS. Determining WSS by combining medical images with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations can be performed both with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and three-dimensional ultrasound (3DUS). This study compares predicted 3D flow patterns based on black blood MRI and 3DUS. Velocity fields in the carotid arteries of nine subjects have been reconstructed, and the haemodynamic wall parameters WSS, oscillatory shear index (OSI), WSS gradients (WSSG) and angle gradients (WSSAG) were compared between the two imaging techniques. There was a good qualitative agreement between results derived from MRI and 3DUS (average correlation strength above 0.60). The root mean square error between haemodynamic wall parameters was comparable to the range of the expected variability of each imaging technique (WSS: 0.411 N m(-2); OSI: 0.048; temporal WSSG: 150 N s(-1) m(-2); spatial WSSG: 2.29 N m(-3); WSSAG: 87.6 rad m(-1)). In conclusion, MRI and 3DUS are capable of providing haemodynamic parameters when combined with CFD, and the predictions are in most cases qualitatively and quantitatively similar. The relatively high cost of MRI and continuing improvement in ultrasound favour US to MRI for future haemodynamic studies of superficial arteries.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Carotid geometry reconstruction: a comparison between MRI and ultrasound.

Image-based Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) has become a popular tool for the prediction of in vivo flow profiles and hemodynamic wall parameters. Currently, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is most widely used for in vivo geometry acquisition. For superficial arteries such as the carotids and the femoral artery, three-dimensional (3-D) extravascular ultrasound (3-DUS) could be a cost-effective alternative to MRI. In this study, nine healthy subjects were scanned both with MRI and 3-DUS. The reconstructed carotid artery geometries for each subject were compared by evaluating cross-sectional areas, centerlines, and carotid nonplanarity. Lumen areas agreed very well between the two different acquisition techniques, whereas centerlines and nonplanarity parameters showed measurable disagreement, possibly due to the different neck and head positions adopted for 3-DUS versus MRI. With the current level of agreement achieved, 3-DUS has the potential to become an inexpensive and fast alternative to MRI for image-based CFD modeling of superficial arteries.

Adult↗