L A Montoya | PubMed Health

PubMed1999

Deaf murderers: clinical and forensic issues.

Data are reported on 28 deaf individuals who were convicted, pled guilty, or have been charged and awaiting trial for murder. The unique forensic issues raised by these cases are discussed, and their clinical picture presented. A significant percentage of these deaf murderers and defendants had such severely limited communication skills in both English and American Sign Language that they lacked the linguistic ability to understand the charges against them and/or to participate in their own defense. As such, they were incompetent to stand trial, due not to mental illness or mental retardation, but to linguistic deficits. This form of incompetence poses a dilemma to the courts that remains unresolved. This same linguistic disability makes it impossible for some deaf suspects to be administered Miranda Warnings in a way comprehensible to them. This paper identifies the reasons for the communication problems many deaf persons face in court and offers remedial steps to help assure fair trials and police interrogations for deaf defendants. The roles and responsibilities of psychiatric and psychological experts in these cases are discussed. Data are provided on the etiology of the 28 individuals' hearing losses, psychiatric/psychological histories, IQs, communication characteristics, educational levels, and victim characteristics.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1999

Funding realities: child abuse diagnostic evaluations in the health care setting.

OBJECTIVE: This study examines staffing, funding sources, reimbursement, and financing of medically-oriented child protection teams. METHOD: A 16-item questionnaire on the composition, size, and services of the team, program costs, revenue sources, reimbursement rates, and perceptions of funding stability was mailed to a sample of 118 medically-oriented child protection teams. RESULTS: After excluding 10 programs, an overall response rate of 68% was obtained. Teams varied in configuration, services, charges, and funding. Over 50% identified funding as being important, yet, demonstrated varying levels of awareness of budget and reimbursement issues. Many generally relied on patient care reimbursement from health care and government payers. Some programs seemed to be doing well financially while others were struggling. Approximately one-third of the respondents indicated that funding was unstable. CONCLUSIONS: Many programs are innovatively knitting together patch-works of funding and support to serve children and families in need. Team leaders should increase their knowledge of fiscal issues in order to be effective advocates at the institutional level for continued team support. A potential way of accomplishing this would be to utilize the existing structure of a national professional association and its national meeting to provide a forum for relatively successful programs to showcase their "ideal models" of team financing.

Child↗