PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L A Petersen

Publications and source records attributed to L A Petersen.

18 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors.

CONTEXT: Adverse drug events (ADEs) are a significant and costly cause of injury during hospitalization. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of 2 interventions for preventing nonintercepted serious medication errors, defined as those that either resulted in or had potential to result in an ADE and were not intercepted before reaching the patient. DESIGN: Before-after comparison between phase 1 (baseline) and phase 2 (after intervention was implemented) and, within phase 2, a randomized comparison between physician computer order entry (POE) and the combination of POE plus a team intervention. SETTING: Large tertiary care hospital. PARTICIPANTS: For the comparison of phase 1 and 2, all patients admitted to a stratified random sample of 6 medical and surgical units in a tertiary care hospital over a 6-month period, and for the randomized comparison during phase 2, all patients admitted to the same units and 2 randomly selected additional units over a subsequent 9-month period. INTERVENTIONS: A physician computer order entry system (POE) for all units and a team-based intervention that included changing the role of pharmacists, implemented for half the units. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Nonintercepted serious medication errors. RESULTS: Comparing identical units between phases 1 and 2, nonintercepted serious medication errors decreased 55%, from 10.7 events per 1000 patient-days to 4.86 events per 1000 (P=.01). The decline occurred for all stages of the medication-use process. Preventable ADEs declined 17% from 4.69 to 3.88 (P=.37), while nonintercepted potential ADEs declined 84% from 5.99 to 0.98 per 1000 patient-days (P=.002). When POE-only was compared with the POE plus team intervention combined, the team intervention conferred no additional benefit over POE. CONCLUSIONS: Physician computer order entry decreased the rate of nonintercepted serious medication errors by more than half, although this decrease was larger for potential ADEs than for errors that actually resulted in an ADE.

Clinical Pharmacy Information Systems↗
PubMed1998

Using a computerized sign-out program to improve continuity of inpatient care and prevent adverse events.

BACKGROUND: Many medical injuries are preventable, but there are few reported successful strategies to prevent such injuries. Previous work identified coverage by house staff not primarily responsible for the patient (cross-coverage) as a significant correlate of risk for preventable adverse events. A four-month intervention--computerized sign-outs--was introduced in 1993 in an urban teaching hospital to improve continuity of care during cross-coverage and thereby reduce risk for preventable adverse events. MEASUREMENTS: A previously tested confidential self-report system was used to identify adverse events, which were defined as unexpected complications of medical therapy that resulted in increased length of stay or disability at discharge. A panel of three board-certified internists confirmed events and evaluated preventability based on case summaries. RESULTS: After the intervention, the rate of preventable adverse events among the 3,747 patients admitted to the medical service decreased from 1.7% to 1.2% (p < 0.10). Both univariate and multivariate analysis revealed no association between cross coverage and preventable adverse events after the intervention. In the baseline period, the odds ratio (OR) for a patient suffering a preventable adverse event during cross coverage was 5.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-18.2; p = 0.01), but was no longer significant after the intervention (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.2-9.0). CONCLUSION: House staff are willing participants in efforts to measure and improve the quality of health care systems. The intervention may have reduced the risk for medical injury associated with discontinuity of inpatients care. Four years after the end of the study, the computerized sign-out program remained an integral part of the computing support system for house staff and was widely used.

APACHE↗
PubMed1998

Nonurgent emergency department visits: the effect of having a regular doctor.

OBJECTIVES: The authors assess the association between having a regular doctor and presentation for nonurgent versus urgent emergency department visits while controlling for potential confounders such as sociodemographics, health status, and comorbidity. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in emergency departments of five urban teaching hospitals in the northeast. Adult patients presenting with chest pain, abdominal pain, or asthma (n = 1696; 88% of eligible) were studied. Patients completed a survey on presentation, reporting sociodemographics, health status, comorbid diseases, and relationship with a regular doctor. Urgency on presentation was assessed by chart review using explicit criteria. RESULTS: Of the 1,696 study participants, 852 (50%) presented with nonurgent complaints. In logistic regression analyses, absence of a relationship with a regular physician was an independent correlate of presentation for a nonurgent emergency department visit (odds ratio 1.6; 95% confidence interval 1.2, 2.2) when controlling for age, gender, marital status, health status, and comorbid diseases. Race, lack of insurance, and education were not associated with nonurgent use. CONCLUSIONS: Absence of a relationship with a regular doctor was correlated with use of the emergency department for selected nonurgent conditions when controlling for important potential confounders. Our study suggests that maintaining a relationship with a regular physician may reduce nonurgent use of the emergency department regardless of insurance status or health status.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Availability of cardiac technology: trends in procedure use and outcomes for patients with acute myocardial infarction.

This study examines temporal trends in the use and outcomes of cardiac procedures for patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction in Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals with and without invasive cardiac services. Between 1988 and 1994, there was striking overall growth in the use of cardiac procedures in the VA. Over this time period, the authors found persistent variation in the use of cardiac procedures but diminished differences in patient survival among patients admitted to different types of hospitals. Growth of cardiac procedure use and improvements in patient survival were most significant in hospitals without on-site invasive cardiac services. We were unable to determine whether survival gains were associated with increased procedure use or unmeasured improvements in the process of care. These trends raise intriguing questions about access to and outcomes of cardiac procedures in health systems composed of hospitals with and without a full complement of on-site invasive cardiac services.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1997

Identification and characterization of an operon in Salmonella typhimurium involved in thiamine biosynthesis.

Thiamine pyrophosphate (TPP) is synthesized de novo in Salmonella typhimurium and is a required cofactor for many enzymes in the cell. Five kinase activities have been implicated in TPP synthesis, which involves joining a 4-methyl-5-(beta-hydroxyethyl)thiazole (THZ) moiety and a 4-amino-5-hydroxymethyl-2-methylpyrimidine (HMP) moiety. We report here identification of a 2-gene operon involved in thiamine biosynthesis and present evidence that the genes in this operon, thiMD, encode two previously identified kinases, THZ kinase and HMP phosphate (HMP-P) kinase, respectively. We further show that this operon belongs to the growing class of genes involved in TPP synthesis that are transcriptionally regulated by TPP. Our data are consistent with ThiM being a salvage enzyme and ThiD being a biosynthetic enzyme involved in TPP synthesis, as previously suggested.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1997

Variegate porphyria in South Africa, 1688-1996--new developments in an old disease.

Variegate porphyria, an autosomal dominant inherited trait resulting in decreased activity of protoporphyrinogen oxidase, the penultimate haem biosynthetic enzyme, is characterised clinically by photosensitive skin disease and a propensity to acute neurovisceral crises. The disease has an exceptionally high frequency in South Africa, owing to a founder effect. The specific mutation in the protoporphyrinogen oxidase gene sequence which represents this founder gene has been identified. Genetic diagnosis is therefore now possible in families in whom the gene defect is known. However, the exact nature and degree of activity of the porphyria can only be determined by detailed quantitative biochemical analysis of excreted porphyrins. The relative contributions of the acute attack and the skin disease to the total disease burden of patients with variegate porphyria is not static, and in South Africa there have been significant changes over the past 25 years, with fewer patients presenting with acute attacks, leaving a greater proportion to present with skin disease or to remain asymptomatic with the diagnosis being made in the laboratory. The most common precipitating cause of the acute attack of VP is administration of porphyrinogenic drugs. Specific suppression of haem synthesis with intravenous haem arginate is the most useful treatment of a moderate or severe acute attack. Although cutaneous lesions are limited to the sun-exposed areas, management of the skin disease of VP remains inadequate.

Animals↗
PubMed1995

Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. Implications for prevention. ADE Prevention Study Group.

OBJECTIVES: To assess incidence and preventability of adverse drug events (ADEs) and potential ADEs. To analyze preventable events to develop prevention strategies. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: All 4031 adult admissions to a stratified random sample of 11 medical and surgical units in two tertiary care hospitals over a 6-month period. Units included two medical and three surgical intensive care units and four medical and two surgical general care units. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adverse drug events and potential ADEs. METHODS: Incidents were detected by stimulated self-report by nurses and pharmacists and by daily review of all charts by nurse investigators. Incidents were subsequently classified by two independent reviewers as to whether they represented ADEs or potential ADEs and as to severity and preventability. RESULTS: Over 6 months, 247 ADEs and 194 potential ADEs were identified. Extrapolated event rates were 6.5 ADEs and 5.5 potential ADEs per 100 nonobstetrical admissions, for mean numbers per hospital per year of approximately 1900 ADEs and 1600 potential ADEs. Of all ADEs, 1% were fatal (none preventable), 12% life-threatening, 30% serious, and 57% significant. Twenty-eight percent were judged preventable. Of the life-threatening and serious ADEs, 42% were preventable, compared with 18% of significant ADEs. Errors resulting in preventable ADEs occurred most often at the stages of ordering (56%) and administration (34%); transcription (6%) and dispensing errors (4%) were less common. Errors were much more likely to be intercepted if the error occurred earlier in the process: 48% at the ordering stage vs 0% at the administration stage. CONCLUSION: Adverse drug events were common and often preventable; serious ADEs were more likely to be preventable. Most resulted from errors at the ordering stage, but many also occurred at the administration stage. Prevention strategies should target both stages of the drug delivery process.

Boston↗
PubMed1995

Evaluation of screening criteria for adverse events in medical patients.

The goals of this study were to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of 15 screening criteria for adverse events, preventable adverse events, and severe adverse events in medical patients, and to evaluate combinations of these criteria, including those available through hospital billing data, to determine whether a small subset of generic screens might efficiently identify adverse events. The authors studied 3,137 consecutive admissions to a medical service over a 4-month period at an urban tertiary care hospital. Chart reviews were performed after discharge by reviewers blinded to the eventual determination of presence of an adverse event. Judgments regarding presence, severity, and preventability of adverse events were made using guided implicit reviews by physicians. Of all admissions, 341 (11%) were judged to include an adverse event, of which 274 were severe and 145 were preventable. Sensitivity and specificity of individual screens varied widely, with prior hospitalization the most sensitive (68%) but least specific (56%). Death was specific (97%) but not sensitive (9%); readmission was intermediate (sensitivity 28%, specificity 80%). In analyses using severe and preventable adverse events as the outcome, results were generally similar. Combinations of screens also were compared, including some using only screens available through billing data; the most sensitive billing strategy detected just 47% of adverse events, but cost only $3 per admission reviewed and $57 per adverse event, versus $13 per admission and $116 per adverse event for a strategy in which all records were reviewed. It is concluded that no small subset of screens identified a high percentage of adverse events. Using screens available through billing data, although insensitive, would be much less costly.

Boston↗
PubMed1994

Does housestaff discontinuity of care increase the risk for preventable adverse events?

OBJECTIVE: To study the relation between housestaff coverage schedules and the occurrence of preventable adverse events. DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: Urban teaching hospital. PATIENTS: All 3146 patients admitted to the medical service during a 4-month period. MEASUREMENTS: A previously tested confidential self-report system to identify adverse events, which were defined as unexpected complications of medical therapy that resulted in increased length of stay or disability at discharge. A panel of three board-certified internists confirmed events and evaluated preventability based on case summaries. Housestaff coverage was coded according to the day in the usual intern's schedule and to cross-coverage status. Cross-coverage was defined as care by a house officer who was not the patient's usual intern and not a member of the usual intern's patient care team. Coverage for an adverse event was assigned according to who was covering during the proximate cause of that event. Clinical data were collected for each patient and two matched controls. RESULTS: Of the 124 adverse events reported and confirmed, 54 (44%) were judged potentially preventable. In the univariate analysis, patients with potentially preventable adverse events were more likely than their controls to be covered by a physician from another team at the time of the event (26% compared with 12% [odds ratio, 3.5; P = 0.01]). In the multivariate analysis, three factors were significant independent correlates of potentially preventable adverse events; cross-coverage (odds ratio, 6.1; 95% CI, 1.4 to 26.7), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (odds ratio per point, 1.2; CI, 1.1 to 1.4), and history of gastrointestinal bleeding (odds ratio, 4.7; CI, 1.2 to 19.0). CONCLUSION: Potentially preventable adverse events were strongly associated with coverage by a physician from another team, which may reflect management by housestaff unfamiliar with the patient. The results emphasize the need for careful attention to the outcome of work-hour reforms for housestaff.

Accident Prevention↗
PubMed1993

Physician reporting compared with medical-record review to identify adverse medical events.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of housestaff physician reporting as a method for identifying adverse events on a medical service and to compare the physician reporting mechanism with a retrospective record review mechanism. SETTING: Medical service of an urban, university-affiliated teaching hospital. DESIGN: Concurrent physician reporting mechanism using the hospital electronic mail system compared with a retrospective record review using a screening mechanism followed by structured, implicit physician review of the record. PATIENTS: All 3146 admissions to the medical service from 13 November 1990 to 14 March 1991. RESULTS: The housestaff physician reporting method identified nearly the same number (89) of adverse events as did the record review (85). However, the two methods identified only 41 of the same patients (kappa = 0.52). No statistically significant clinical or socioeconomic differences occurred between the patients identified as having had an adverse event, using the two reporting methods (physician versus record review). The housestaff did report statistically more preventable adverse events (62.5% compared with 32%; P = 0.003). The physician reporting mechanism was also less costly (approximately $15,000 compared with $54,000). CONCLUSION: An adverse event identification strategy based on physician self-referral uncovers as many adverse events as does a record review and is less costly. In addition, physician-identified events are more likely to be preventable and, thus, are targets for quality improvement.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Integrating providers into quality improvement: a pilot project at one hospital.

Brigham and Women's Hospital initiated a study of the quality of care centering on self-reporting of potential medical injuries by providers. The goal of the study is to decrease the incidence of such injuries through a continuous quality methodology that integrates providers into the identification phase and incorporates all hospital employees in the development of new practices. This article provides an overview of the investigation methodology and discusses the conceptual relationships between clinical epidemiological analyses and industrial quality improvement.

Boston↗
PubMed1989

Isolation and characterization of isoprene mutants of Escherichia coli.

Isoprenoid compounds are found in all organisms. In Escherichia coli the isoprene pathway has three distinct branches: the modification of tRNA; the respiratory quinones ubiquinone and menaquinone; and the dolichols, which are long-chain alcohols involved in cell wall biosynthesis. Very little is known about procaryotic isoprene biosynthesis compared with what is known about eucaryote isoprene biosynthesis. This study approached some of the questions about isoprenoid biosynthesis and regulation in procaryotes by isolating and characterizing mutants in E. coli. Mutants were selected by determining their resistance to low levels of aminoglycoside antibiotics, which require an electron transport chain for uptake into bacterial cells. The mutants were characterized with regard to their phenotypes, map positions, enzymatic activities, and total ubiquinone content. In particular, the enzymes studied were isopentenyldiphosphate delta-isomerase (EC 5.3.3.2), farnesyldiphosphate synthetase (EC 2.5.1.1), and higher prenyl transferases.

Butadienes↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A value-laden issue.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Breast Feeding↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Fetal surveillance in multifetal pregnancy.

Multiple methods of tocolysis and fetal surveillance provide unprecedented ways to improve multifetal outcomes through meticulous antepartum care. Although few practitioners have much experience with these complicated pregnancies, knowledge is growing with the increasing incidence of multifetal pregnancy. A review of the current literature regarding antepartum surveillance provides the basis for a discussion of the techniques essential to quality nursing care during multifetal pregnancy. Guidelines are provided for nursing standards in documentation, terminology, and care during surveillance of multiple fetuses.

Cardiotocography↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The costs of adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. Adverse Drug Events Prevention Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the additional resource utilization associated with an adverse drug event (ADE). DESIGN: Nested case-control study within a prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: The cohort included 4108 admissions to a stratified random sample of 11 medical and surgical units in 2 tertiary-care hospitals over a 6-month period. Cases were patients with an ADE, and the control for each case was the patient on the same unit as the case with the most similar pre-event length of stay. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postevent length of stay and total costs. METHODS: Incidents were detected by self-report stimulated by nurses and pharmacists and by daily chart review, and were classified as to whether they represented ADEs. Information on length of stay and charges was obtained from billing data, and costs were estimated by multiplying components of charges times hospital-specific ratios of costs to charges. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 247 ADEs among 207 admissions. After outliers and multiple episodes were excluded, there were 190 ADEs, of which 60 were preventable. In paired regression analyses adjusting for multiple factors, including severity, comorbidity, and case mix, the additional length of stay associated with an ADE was 2.2 days (P=.04), and the increase in cost associated with an ADE was $3244 (P=.04). For preventable ADEs, the increases were 4.6 days in length of stay (P=.03) and $5857 in total cost (P=.07). After adjusting for our sampling strategy, the estimated postevent costs attributable to an ADE were $2595 for all ADEs and $4685 for preventable ADEs. Based on these costs and data about the incidence of ADEs, we estimate that the annual costs attributable to all ADEs and preventable ADEs for a 700-bed teaching hospital are $5.6 million and $2.8 million, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The substantial costs of ADEs to hospitals justify investment in efforts to prevent these events. Moreover, these estimates are conservative because they do not include the costs of injuries to patients or malpractice costs.

Boston↗