PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L A Stewart

Publications and source records attributed to L A Stewart.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2002

Chemotherapy in adult high-grade glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 12 randomised trials.

BACKGROUND: Trials on the effect of systemic chemotherapy on survival and recurrence in adults with high-grade glioma have had inconclusive results. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effects of such treatment on survival and recurrence. METHODS: We did a systematic review and meta-analysis using updated data on individual patients from all available randomised trials that compared radiotherapy alone with radiotherapy plus chemotherapy. Data for 3004 patients from 12 randomised controlled trials were included (11 published and one unpublished). FINDINGS: Overall, the results showed significant prolongation of survival associated with chemotherapy, with a hazard ratio of 0.85 (95% CI 0.78-0.91, p<0.0001) or a 15% relative decrease in the risk of death. This effect is equivalent to an absolute increase in 1-year survival of 6% (95% CI 3-9) from 40% to 46% and a 2-month increase in median survival time (1-3). There was no evidence that the effect of chemotherapy differed in any group of patients defined by age, sex, histology, performance status, or extent of resection. INTERPRETATION: This small but clear improvement in survival from chemotherapy encourages further study of drug treatment of these tumours.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Preoperative radiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma. Oeosphageal Cancer Collaborative Group.

BACKGROUND: The existing randomized evidence has failed to conclusively demonstrate the benefit or otherwise of preoperative radiotherapy in treating patients with potentially resectable esophageal carcinoma. OBJECTIVES: This meta-analysis aimed to assess whether there is benefit from adding radiotherapy prior to surgery and whether or not any pre-defined patient subgroups benefit more or less from preoperative radiotherapy SEARCH STRATEGY: Medline and CancerLit searches were supplemented by information from trial registers and by hand searching relevant meeting proceedings and by discussion with relevant trialists, organisations and industry. SELECTION CRITERIA: Trials were eligible for inclusion in this meta-analysis provided they randomized patients with potentially resectable carcinoma of the esophagus (of any histological type) to receive radiotherapy or no radiotherapy prior to surgery. Trials must have used a randomization method which precluded prior knowledge of treatment assignment and completed accrual by December 1993, to ensure sufficient follow-up by the time of the first analysis (September 1995). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: A quantitative meta-analysis using updated data from individual patients from all properly randomized trials (published or unpublished) comprising 1147 patients (971 deaths) from five randomized trials. This approach was used to assess whether preoperative radiotherapy improves overall survival and whether it is differentially effective in patients defined by age, sex and tumour location. MAIN RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 9 years, in a group patients with mostly squamous carcinomas, the hazard ratio (HR) of 0.89 (95% CI 0.78-1.01) suggests an overall reduction in the risk of death of 11% and an absolute survival benefit of 3% at 2 years and 4% at 5 years. This result is not conventionally statistically significant (p=0.062). No clear differences in the size of the effect by sex, age or tumor location were apparent. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Based on existing trials, there was no clear evidence that preoperative radiotherapy improves the survival of patients with potentially resectable esophageal cancer. These results indicate that if such preoperative radiotherapy regimens do improve survival, then the effect is likely to be modest with an absolute improvement in survival of around 3 to 4%. Trials or a meta-analysis of around 2000 patients (90% power, 5% significance level) would be needed to reliably detect such an improvement (from 15 to 20%).

Esophageal Neoplasms↗
PubMed2000

Is there bias in the publication of individual patient data meta-analyses?

OBJECTIVE: There is increasing empirical evidence for the existence of bias in the publication of primary clinical research, with statistically significant results being published more readily, more quickly, and in higher impact journals. Meta-analysis of individual patient data (IPD) may represent a gold standard of "secondary" clinical research, giving the best possible summary of current evidence for a particular question, but publication of these may also be subject to bias. This study aimed to explore which factors might be associated with publication of IPD meta-analyses and to identify potential sources of bias. METHODS: For all known IPD meta-analysis projects in cancer, the responsible investigator was surveyed by means of a questionnaire to determine descriptive characteristics of the meta-analysis, the nature of the results, and details of the publication history. RESULTS: There is no good evidence that overall publication status of meta-analyses in cancer is dependent on the statistical or clinical significance of the results. However, those meta-analyses with nonsignificant results did seem to take longer to publish and were published in lower impact journals compared with those with more striking results. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the current data, there seems to be no strong association between the results of IPD meta-analyses in cancer and publication.

Humans↗
PubMed2000

Autologous stem cell transplantation for malignancy: a systematic review of the literature.

A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to assess what published evidence is currently available to support the increasing use of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), and to evaluate the published data with regard to the comparative cost of high-dose and conventional therapy. The review aimed to identify all published, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing high-dose therapy (HDT) with ASCT versus conventional chemotherapy (CC) in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease, multiple myeloma, and breast, lung, testicular and ovarian cancer. The review also aimed to identify all studies that had compared the cost of the two treatment strategies. Reports were identified by systematic searches of Cancerlit, Embase and Medline, and handsearching of several conference proceedings. Where possible, pooled odds ratios (ORs) were calculated according to the fixed-effect model. A total of 18 randomized trials were identified in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease, multiple myeloma, and breast, lung and testicular cancer. Trials were generally small and no disease site had sufficient information to determine reliably whether high-dose therapy with autologous transplant is more effective than CC. Five studies were identified that compared the cost of the two treatments. These found the cost of HDT to be between one and four times higher than that of CC. Further randomized trials are required. Where appropriate, these should include economic assessment and assessments of long-term toxicity.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1999

Can the published data tell us about the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cancer of the uterine cervix?

The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on survival of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer was investigated by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published data. Of the 21 randomised trials that we identified, only 15 were published. Furthermore, 2-year survival data could be extracted from only seven trial reports and 3-year survival from only nine trial reports. Meta-analyses of the published data at 2 and 3 years are neither clearly in favour of neoadjuvant chemotherapy nor control (2 years: odds ratio (OR) = 1.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.83-1.45, P = 0.37; 3 years: OR = 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.73-1.25, P = 0.45). Being restricted to only some of the data from a relatively small fraction of the randomised trials, these analyses potentially suffer from a number of biases and are therefore inconclusive. The only reliable way to judge the value of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in this disease is to perform a meta-analysis of centrally collected, updated, individual data on all patients from all known randomised trials. Such an analysis is currently being carried out by an international collaborative group.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1999

Evaluation and management of the "red face". Interview by K. Watsky and M. Rothe.

Patients presenting with a "red face" challenge clinicians to consider a broad differential diagnosis that includes contact dermatitis. The diagnosis may be obscured or complicated by underlying actinic damage or rosacea. Unraveling this Gordian knot to arrive at a precise and accurate diagnosis takes patience and practice. The collective experience of our invited group of expert clinicians sheds light on this process.

Acne Vulgaris↗
PubMed1999

Species-specific distribution of alpha-galactosyl epitopes on the gastric H/K ATPase beta-subunit: relevance to the binding of human anti-parietal cell autoantibodies.

The gastric H/K ATPase beta-subunit, an abundant glycoprotein of the secretory membranes of gastric parietal cells, is the major autoantigen recognized by human parietal cell autoantibodies in gastric autoimmunity. Our previous studies demonstrated that the human autoantibodies recognize the H/K ATPase beta-subunit from a number of species and that glycosylation of the beta-subunit with complex N-glycans is required for autoantibody binding. The N-glycans of the beta-subunit contain polylactosamine chains. The lactosamine chains of the rabbit beta-subunit are terminated with alpha-linked galactosyl residues (alpha-galactosyl epitope) (Tyagarajan et al., Biochemistry, 1996, 35, 3238-3246). Here we have investigated the expression of alpha-galactosyl epitopes on the H/K ATPase beta-subunit from a number of species. Using the alpha-galactosyl binding lectin, BS1-IB4, and naturally occurring anti-alpha-galactosyl antibodies, we have demonstrated that the rat H/K ATPase beta-subunit also contains terminal alpha-galactosyl residues, but not the beta-subunit from pig, dog, and mouse, indicating species-specific differences in the terminal saccharide sequences of the beta-subunit. We also investigated the potential contribution of the alpha-galactosyl epitopes to the binding by human sera. The reactivity of human pernicious anemia serum with gastric parietal cells could not be inhibited with saccharide inhibitors and, in addition, no binding was observed with normal human sera. We conclude that the H/K ATPase beta-subunit oligosaccharides from rabbit and rat are terminated with alpha-galactosyl epitopes, and although the presence of this epitope does not contribute to binding by human parietal cell autoantibodies at the concentrations routinely used, it is recommended that neither rat or rabbit stomachs be used for screening human sera.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Preoperative radiotherapy in esophageal carcinoma: a meta-analysis using individual patient data (Oesophageal Cancer Collaborative Group).

PURPOSE: The existing randomized evidence has failed to conclusively demonstrate the benefit or otherwise of preoperative radiotherapy in treating patients with potentially resectable esophageal carcinoma. This meta-analysis aimed to assess whether there is benefit from adding radiotherapy prior to surgery. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This quantitative meta-analysis included updated individual patient data from all properly randomized trials (published or unpublished) comprising 1147 patients (971 deaths) from five randomized trials. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 9 years, the hazard ratio (HR) of 0.89 (95% CI 0.78-1.01) suggests an overall reduction in the risk of death of 11% and an absolute survival benefit of 3% at 2 years and 4% at 5 years. This result is not conventionally statistically significant (p = 0.062). No clear differences in the size of the effect by sex, age, or tumor location were apparent. CONCLUSION: Based on existing trials, there was no clear evidence that preoperative radiotherapy improves the survival of patients with potentially resectable esophageal cancer. These results indicate that if such preoperative radiotherapy regimens do improve survival, then the effect is likely to be modest with an absolute improvement in survival of around 3 to 4%. Trials or a meta-analysis of around 2000 patients would be needed to reliably detect such an improvement (15-->20%).

Carcinoma↗
PubMed1997

Thirty years of Medical Research Council randomized trials in solid tumours.

This paper reviews the survival outcome from the randomized Phase III trials in solid tumours published on behalf of, or in collaboration with, the Cancer Therapy Committee (CTC) of the British Medical Research Council over a 30-year period to 31 December 1995. We review briefly the innovations in statistical methodology that have occurred over the period. We also note the ways in which standards of reporting the trials have improved, with more recent publications including, for example, estimates of the size of effect and confidence intervals. In all, 32 trials, involving over 5000 deaths in more than 8000 patients, have been published. Tumour types have included bladder, bone, brain, cervix, colon and rectum, head and neck, kidney, lung, ovary, prostate and skin. This paper presents a bibliography of these trials and gives details of the treatment comparisons made, the numbers of patients randomized and included in the analysis for each treatment arm, the observed numbers of deaths, and an estimate of the hazard ratio with associated 95% confidence intervals. The bibliography also indicates the main endpoint of each trial, whether recurrence-free survival or survival, and whether the trial was aimed at finding a difference or showing equivalence. The MRC trials have made an impact on both clinical practice and research activities. For example, the lung cancer programme has helped to establish the role of chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer and has developed better palliative treatment for non-small cell lung cancer. Trials of the radiosensitizer misonidazole have demonstrated that it has no role in the treatment of a number of cancers, trials of hyperbaric oxygen have defined the biological activity of this approach, and the appropriate dose of radiotherapy in patients with brain tumours has been found. The individual trials recruited between 44 and 824 patients (median 213). A better measure of the information in a trial is the number of deaths reported, which varied from 28 to 661 (median 145). A large proportion of the comparisons (8/29 or 28%) anticipating a survival difference, demonstrated such a difference at the 5% level of significance. Despite this, it is concluded that some of the trials should have been larger. In such cases, hindsight suggests either that an overoptimistic view of the anticipated survival benefit was taken at the design stage, or, for equivalence trials, the planned confidence interval was too wide for definitive statements to be made. As a consequence, the current CTC profolio of ongoing randomized trials open to patient accrual at 1 January 1996 have a projected median size of 600 and range from 120 to 2000 patients.

Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic↗
PubMed1997

Meta-analyses using individual patient data.

Systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials often provide the most reliable information on which to base treatment policy. However, to be reliable, such reviews need to contain a high proportion of all the relevant randomized evidence. This relates both to the need to find all trials and the need to analyse data on all participants. One way to achieve this is through a collaboration in which those responsible for the trials supply data on each randomized patient for an individual patient data meta-analysis. However, such projects require more time and resources than more conventional reviews and are still rare. This paper illustrates how they can help to achieve the aim of using complete data in a systematic review.

Humans↗
PubMed1997

Comparison of in vivo and in vitro measures of beryllium sensitization.

Chronic beryllium disease (CBD) diagnosis hinges on demonstrating a cell-mediated immune response to beryllium salts in vitro with the beryllium lymphocyte proliferation test (BeLPT). The BeLPT has found widespread application in screening for CBD and beryllium sensitization in populations of exposed workers. We hypothesized that the in vivo beryllium salt patch test may be of value as an adjunct to the BeLPT, rectifying false negative or ambiguous blood test results. We studied subjects with CBD (n = 11), beryllium sensitization without disease (n = 3), and control subjects with dermatitis (n = 20). Evaluation included completion of a demographic questionnaire, blood BeLPT (if CBD or beryllium-sensitized), and beryllium patch testing with 0.1% and 1% beryllium sulfate (BeSO4) in petrolatum and in aqueous vehicles. Biopsies were performed at abnormal patch test sites in five subjects. The 1% aqueous BeSO4 proved superior either to 1% petrolatum or 0.1% solutions, producing positive reactions in all CBD and beryllium-sensitized subjects. We observed no long-term adverse reactions. Biopsies demonstrated spongiotic changes early, followed by noncaseating granulomas within 18 days. We conclude that the beryllium patch test can be used safely to clarify the sensitization state and diagnosis of CBD.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗
PubMed1996

Patch testing to cosmetics and topical drugs.

Evaluating patients with a possible cosmetic or medicament allergy is an excellent way for dermatologists to become acquainted with using patch test substances beyond the standard tray. Testing should include standard tray allergens and almost all topical products themselves. False-positive and false-negative results must always be considered in evaluating patch test results. Repeat open application testing can be useful in confirming patch test results, but it is best to test each ingredient separately. If they are willing to take the time, dermatologists can easily and efficiently evaluate these patients.

Allergens↗
PubMed1996

Bias in the analysis and reporting of randomized controlled trials.

The most reliable information on any type of medical intervention is provided by the results of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). In response to increasing pressure to make effective use of limited resources, increasing numbers of health professionals rely on the medical literature, in particular reports of RCTs. However, RCTs may be influenced by a number of factors that introduce bias during the conduct, analysis, and reporting of the trial. Trials may be described as random, when in fact only quasi-random means of treatment allocation have been used; patients may be selectively removed from the analysis; and the report may restrict presentation to or give undue emphasis to only the analyses that yield positive results. The implications of such bias are discussed with particular reference to the effect that they may have on reviews and meta-analyses.

Bias↗