PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L A Varese

Publications and source records attributed to L A Varese.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Effect and pharmacokinetics of netilmicin given as bolus intramuscular administration: an open comparative trial versus amikacin and fosfomycin in elderly patients affected by urinary tract infections.

A randomized comparative open clinical trial was performed on 96 hospitalized patients of both sexes, most of whom (84.4%) over 60 years of age, affected by simple and complicated urinary tract infections. Patients were divided in three unequal sized groups and treated with a single administration of netilmicin (5 mg/kg intramuscularly), of amikacin (15 mg/kg i.m.) or of fosfomycin (3 g per os). Patients were evaluated clinically and microbiologically before the beginning of the therapy, 1, 7, 15, 30 days thereafter and at monthly intervals, up to the 18th month, after the drug administration. The pharmacokinetic study was performed in six elderly patients of both sexes, apparently in good general health, except for their urinary tract infections. Symptoms of urinary tract infection disappeared in 50 out of 53 (94.3%) patients treated with netilmicin 14.48 +/- 9.6 hours after the drug administration, in 22 out of 23 (95.6%) of those treated with amikacin after 31.9 +/- 14.3 hours and in 16 (84.2%) out of 19 of symptomatic patients treated with fosfomycin after 37.5 +/- 10.6 hours. The disappearance of symptoms in netilmicin-treated patients is significantly (p less than 0.01) faster than in the other two groups. Twenty-four hours after the administration, netilmicin and amikacin produced sterilization of the cultures in more than 95% of cases, fosfomycin in 90%. Of those patients in which sterilization of cultures was achieved about 70%, in the netilmicin group, and 50% in the other two treatment groups had sterile urine cultures after one month. At the end of the study, 18 months later, more than 60% of the patients treated with netilmicin, the infection had not recurred in comparison with 39.1% and 50% in the amikacin and fosfomycin groups respectively. If only the patients with uncomplicated infections were considered, 88.9% and 83.3% had sterile cultures after 1 and 18 months respectively in the netilmicin group. The corresponding figures in other two groups were: 66.7% for both time intervals in the case of amikacin and 60% both for 1 and 18 months in the case of fosfomycin. The pharmacokinetic results indicate that netilmicin is rapidly absorbed and distributed from the injection site, possesses a beta half-life of about two hours and is mainly excreted by the kidneys. The single dose administration produces very high urinary concentrations of the drug in the first 24 hours and concentrations above 4 micrograms/ml, the 90% minimum inhibitory concentration cut-off point for netilmicin sensitive strains, for four days(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Age Factors↗

Fosfomycin trometamol versus netilmicin in children's lower urinary tract infections.

Fosfomycin trometamol (FT), an antibiotic active against the common urinary pathogens, may be demonstrated in adequate urine concentrations up to 36-48 h after a single oral dose of 1-2 g. This pharmacokinetic peculiarity seems to indicate that this antibiotic may be used in single doses in the therapy of lower urinary tract infections (UTIs) in infants and children. The efficacy and safety of FT in single oral doses was compared with those of netilmicin (NM), an aminoglycoside antibiotic with a demonstrated efficacy in bolus doses against UTIs, shown in a multicentric study. One hundred and thirty-five children with lower UTI, diagnosed on the basis of fever (less than 38 degrees C), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (less than 25 mm/l h) and C-reactive protein (less than 20 micrograms/ml), were included in the study: 71 received 2 g of FT, 64 5 mg/kg of NM. Cure, defined as persistence of sterile urine up to 30 days after therapy, was reached in 80.2% of children in the FT group and in 81.2% of children in the NM group. Persistence of infection was demonstrated in 7 and in 3 children, respectively. Recurrence of infection was noticed in 7 patients in the FT group and in 9 in the NM group. No differences between FT- and NM-treated children are demonstrable even if the patient population is analyzed according to the higher risk of UTI because of the presence of an anatomical and/or functional abnormality of the urinary tract or due to a previous tendency to recurrent UTIs. FT is as effective as NM in the treatment of lower UTIs in infants and children.

Adolescent↗