PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L A Yarzábal

Publications and source records attributed to L A Yarzábal.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1980

[Hydatidosis: new concepts in an old disease (First part) (author's transl)].

In the first part of this review several aspects of the classical echinococcosis due to E. granulosus are commented on (geographical distribution, morphological, epidemiological, taxonomic and pathogenetic characteristics). The real incidence of this disease in Spain is unknown due to the absence of global epidemiological data, especially by the lack of sero-epidemiological surveys. Epidemiological measures necessary to establish a control program for this zoonosis are recommended. In relation to the pathogenesis of the parasitosis, the authors mention some clinicopathologic characteristics which are conditioned to the anatomy and function of the organs where hydatids are located.

Animals↗
PubMed1975

Evaluation of whole and purified hydatid fluid antigens in the diagnosis of human hydatidosis by the immunoelectrophoresis test.

Whole sheep hydatid cyst fluid (WHF) and purified hydatid fluid antigens (PHF) were evaluated in the immunoelectrophoresis (IEP) test for the diagnosis of human hydatid disease. A higher sensitivity was obtained using the PHF than with the WHF antigen but false positive results were observed with the former in 22.4% of the 102 non-hydatid sera examined. Using the presence of arc 5 as the criterion of positivity however, no false positives were observed in non-hydatid sera with the WHF antigen. It is postulated that the number of bands other than arc 5 may be of value in the diagnosis of hydatid disease by the IEP test, in cases where this diagnostic arc is absent.

Animals↗
PubMed1975

Evaluation of three immunodiagnostic tests for human hydatid disease.

The comparative sensitivity and specificity of the immunoelectrophoresis (IEP), latex agglutination (LA) and indirect hemagglutination (IHA) test for hydatidosis were evaluated using a single hydatid cyst fluid pool as antigen and the same hydatid and nonhydatid sera and were found to vary with the type of IHA test, the criterion for IHA test positively and the group of sera selected for study. The sensitivity of the LA and IEP tests was comparable, both tests correlated well and neither gave a positive result in the nonhydatid sera studied. The sensitivity of the IEP test was higher when IHA test positivity was based on diagnostically significant titers but not when all IHA test reactors were considered as positive to this test. The merits and limitations of the LA and IHA tests in diagnostic and seroepidemiologic studies of human hydatidosis are discussed. On the basis of the present findings, the use of the LA test and possibly of the tannic acid IHA test, to screen for IEP test positive sera is proposed as the most reliable immunodiagnostic approach to estimate the prevalence of human hydatidosis for seroepidemiologic purposes and also for detecting hydatidosis cases in the field.

Animals↗
PubMed1975

Comparative sensitivity and specificity of the Casoni intradermal and the immunoelectrophoresis tests for the diagnosis of hydatid disease.

The Casoni intradermal (ID) test, using two antigens, was compared with the immunoelectrophoresis (IEP) test for diagnosis in 47 surgically confirmed cases of hydatid disease and 73 non-hydatid persons. An antigen prepared from boiled hydatid cyst fluid (HF) was markedly more sensitive in the ID test than another prepared from whole HF but both produced false-positive reactions in three persons with other disease conditions. The IEP test yielded no false positives and its sensitivity was similar to the ID test using the more sensitive boiled HF antigen. Some patients were ID-positive and IEP-negative and vice-versa. Diagnostic sensitivity of both tests varied according to the localization and condition of the cyst. A detectable immune response was more frequent in patients with liver cysts than in those with lung cysts. Regardless of cyst localization, lowest diagnostic sensitivity was observed in patients whose cysts were intact and of the hyaline type, whereas recently broken cysts were associated with the most consistently detectable immune response. The limitations of the ID test are discussed and it is suggested that, until more specific antigens are available, there appears to be little value in utilizing this test where the more specific serological techniques are available.

Animals↗