PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L Agreus

Publications and source records attributed to L Agreus.

3 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms and health-related quality of life in the adult general population--the Kalixanda study.

BACKGROUND: The impact of gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms on health-related quality of life in the general population is poorly characterized. AIM: To identify the frequency of troublesome reflux symptoms associated with impaired health-related quality of life in the general population. METHODS: A representative random sample of 3000 adult inhabitants of northern Sweden was surveyed using the validated Abdominal Symptom Questionnaire (response rate 74%). In total, 1001 random responders were endoscoped and assessed using the Short Form-36 Health Survey. RESULTS: Complete data were obtained for 999 subjects: 6% reported reflux symptoms (heartburn and/or regurgitation) daily, 14% weekly and 20% less than weekly during the previous 3 months. Compared with no reflux symptoms, a clinically relevant impairment of health-related quality of life (>or=5 points and P < 0.05) was seen in all eight Short Form-36 dimensions for daily symptoms, in five dimensions for weekly symptoms and in one dimension for less than weekly symptoms. There were no meaningful differences in Short Form-36 scores between subjects with and without oesophagitis. CONCLUSIONS: Most aspects of health-related quality of life were impaired in individuals with daily or weekly reflux symptoms. Troublesome reflux symptoms at least weekly may identify gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

An evaluation of whole blood testing for Helicobacter pylori in general practice.

BACKGROUND: Rapid whole blood tests for Helicobacter pylori infection were developed to assist in the management of patients with dyspepsia in general practice. However, they have not been extensively tested in this setting. AIM: To investigate the test characteristics of the BM-Test (Helisal Quick Test) when used in general practice. METHOD: One hundred and ten dyspeptic patients attending local general practitioners were recruited into the study. The BM-Test was administered by the general practitioner at the screening visit according to standard instructions supplied with the test kit. The patient was then referred to Nepean or Mornington Peninsula Hospitals for further assessment. including a 14C-urea breath test. The test kit was forwarded to the appropriate hospital centre for an independent, blinded reading. The sensitivity and specificity of the BM-Test were evaluated against the results of the 14C-UBT. RESULTS: Based on general practitioner readings, the BM-Test had a sensitivity of 59.3% and a specificity of 90.2%. The positive and negative predictive values were 87.5% and 65.7%, respectively. When based on independent readings, sensitivity rose to 71.2% and specificity fell to 88.2%. The BM-Test was more sensitive for older patients than for younger patients when based on both the general practitioner and independent readings. CONCLUSION: The BM-Test performs below the generally recommended sensitivity and specificity of 90% required for clinical practice.

Adult↗