[Use of ketotifen in allergic bronchial asthma].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to L Andri.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The effectiveness of oral ketotifen was compared with that of placebo in 26 patients with food allergy in a randomized, double-blind parallel study. Patients were selected on the basis of food allergy as established by history, clinical improvement after an exclusion diet, and reappearance of the symptoms after a challenge with the food. Thirteen patients were given ketotifen and 13, placebo. Ketotifen or placebo were administered twice daily for 1 month after the first oral provocation test and the last dose was given 12 hours before the second oral provocation test. Ketotifen protected patients (7/13) significantly more than placebo (2/13; P less than .05). The results of this study suggest that ketotifen may be useful for some patients with food allergy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Over the last few years, many studies have been carried out in order to individualize which nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) can be tolerated in aspirin sensitivity. Imidazole salicylate (IS) is a new NSAID that inhibits Tromboxane A2 synthesis, without interferring with cyclo-oxygenase pathway, whose inhibition was demonstrated to cause asthma and/or urticaria/angioedema in aspirin-sensitive patients. We enrolled 67 subjects with documented intolerance to aspirin, pyrazolones or NSAIDs, clinically manifested as urticaria/angioedema (68%), asthma, and/or rhinitis (32%). A challenge with IS was carried out in every patient in single-blind fashion, reaching a cumulative dosage of 1000 mg in the fourth session. No appearance of urticaria or bronchospastic reactions was registered in any subject, confirming the safe use of IS in aspirin-sensitive patients.
BACKGROUND: Efficacy and safety of local nasal immunotherapy has been demonstrated by many placebo-controlled clinical trials. The treatment schedule consists of an induction phase at increasing dosages followed by a maintenance phase. Aim of present study has been to evaluate a new simplified treatment schedule at constant dosage. METHODS AND RESULTS: 26 grass-allergic rhinitic patients have been treated according to the new constant dosage schedule, while 15 patients in a control group were treated with conventional incremental dosage schedule. A commercial preparation of allergens incorporated into powder (Allerkin). The total cumulative dosage administered with conventional schedule resulted higher than simplified constant schedule (5,025 vs 3,000 AU). To evaluate efficacy, symptom and rescue medication scores were recorded during the spring pollen season, and a subjective overall evaluation was asked to the patients at the end of the season. The analysis of scores showed that the two treatment schedules were equivalent as regards both efficacy and safety, being side effects light and restricted to the administration site (sneezing). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a constant dosage schedules is suggested for the administration of local nasal immunotherapy, having as advantage a better simplicity. Avoidance of mistakes in dosages is considered important in a therapy which is self-administered by patients.
Some peculiar aspects of bronchial asthma in women are pointed out and critically examined. The course of asthma is considered during the typical endocrine phases in women (i.e. pregnancy, menstrual cycle and menopause). A worsening is often reported between the 29th and 36th week of pregnancy; the clinical status during pregnancy is attributed to the interaction between the positive effect of cortisol and the antagonism of DOCA, progesterone, aldosterone on the cortisol-glucocorticoid pulmonary receptors. Also the increase of hypotalamic concentration of noradrenaline which inhibits the pituitary-adrenal axis is considered among of the causes of the worsening of symptoms; moreover the increase of progesterone enhances the gastroesophageal reflux which acts as a trigger stimulus and causes bronchospasm. The therapeutic aspects are examined. All the pharmacologic principles are considered regarding the possible harm to the pregnant woman or the fetus. The oldest and well established molecules are considered the most reliable. Bronchial asthma is then examined with regard to menstrual cycle; pre-menstrual asthma is critically reviewed. The Authors conclude that there are neither conclusive data nor a specific therapy. Finally the pathogenesis of perimenopausal asthma is discussed. A possible hyperestrogenism with possible modification of the PGF2/PGE2 rate may be the cause of this syndrome.