PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L Askew

Publications and source records attributed to L Askew.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

An evaluation of Beam cath in the verification process for prostate cancer radiotherapy.

AIMS: As the trend towards more conformal treatment continues, the accuracy of treatment delivery becomes more important. Conventionally, treatment set-up for prostate cancer patients is verified in relation to the bony anatomy. However, there can be prostate movement independent of bony anatomy. This study tested the feasibility of using Beam cath to enable online correction of treatment set-up in relation to the prostate position, and to assess inter-fraction and intra-fraction prostate movement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Beam cath is a urethral catheter containing radio-opaque markers, which can be seen on electronic portal imaging, enabling verification of prostate rather than bony anatomy position. The Beam cath was used for planning and treatment of a boost phase of 10 Gy in 5 fractions, delivered before the conventional conformal plan of 60 Gy in 30 fractions. Patients were scanned by computed tomgography (CT), with and without the catheter, and a radio-opaque marker in the catheter was used as the isocentre of the boost phase to enable accurate and rapid pre-treatment isocentre adjustment. The set-up errors between the Beam Cath and bony images were compared to identify the magnitude of prostate movement, independent of bony anatomy. Post-treatment portal images were taken to assess intra-fraction prostate movement. RESULTS: Of 29 patients approached to take part in the study, 18 patients gave informed consent, but only five completed the intended 5 fractions of the boost phase using Beam cath. Pre- and post-treatment portal images were obtained for a total of 29 fractions in six patients. Inter-fraction prostate movement, independent of bony anatomy, was identified. The mean movements were 0.2 mm (standard deviation [SD] 1.2 mm), 2.9 mm (SD 3.1 mm) and 0.7 mm (SD 2.3 mm) in the right left (RL), cranio-caudal (CC) and anterior posterior (AP) direction, respectively. The mean intra-fraction movement was 0.2 mm (SD 1.2 mm), 2.9 mm (SD 3.1 mm) and 0.7 mm (SD 2.3 mm) in the RL, CC and AP direction, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although independent prostate movement was identified, the use of Beam cath was poorly tolerated. Alternative methods of identifying and correcting for prostate movement should be investigated.

Aged↗

Prosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus.

Eighteen patients had prosthetic proximal humeral replacement with either a metal or ceramic prosthesis. Three replacements were performed for fracture nonunions, five for benign neoplasms, six for low-grade malignancies, and four for high-grade malignancies. Retention of elbow and hand function was good. In five of the 11 ceramic prostheses, failure occurred at the humeral-prosthetic junction even though it was designed for biologic fixation. Ten of 18 prostheses subluxated or dislocated. Twelve of 18 patients have had revision operations. While the revision rate in this initial series was high, valuable experience was gained for further investigations of shoulder arthroplasty.

Adolescent↗

Silastic prosthetic replacement for the radial head.

Seventeen patients had a Silastic prosthesis for the radial head inserted following fracture of that structure. Follow-up averaged 6.7 years. Nine of the seventeen patients had had an associated dislocation of the elbow or a Monteggia fracture. Six patients received the implant at the time of the treatment for the fracture and all six were doing well, although the implant had failed radiographically in three of the six. There were five failures among the other eleven patients; four of the five had the prosthesis removed. On the basis of these data, we concluded that the indications for use of the Silastic radial-head prosthesis after fracture are extremely limited, and its routine use cannot be justified.

Adult↗