Biomedical subjects

L B Engesaeter

Publications and source records attributed to L B Engesaeter.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2004

Epidemiology of severely and fatally injured patients in western part of Norway.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Analysis of the injury mechanism and characteristics of severely and fatally injured patients in the western part of Norway. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We did a prospective registration of all severely injured patients hospitalized during a three-year period. The files of severely injured patients that died at scene or during transport were retrospectively retrieved from the Forensic Department. A total of 558 patients with an Injury Severity Score > 15 were included. RESULTS: Four-hundred-forty-four men (79.6 %) and 114 women (20.4 %) with a median age of 36 and 51.5 years respectively were included. The proportion of female patients older than 80 years were 19.3 % compared to 5.6 % for men. A total of 215 (38.5 %) patients died and 149 (69.3 %) of these patients died on scene or during transport. The incidence of severely injured patients in Hordaland County was 30 per 100,000 inhabitants per year. The incidence was lowest among children below 5 years (7/100,000/year) and highest among persons older than 80 years (95/100,000/year). Men had a 3.8 times greater risk of getting seriously injured compared to women. Road traffic accidents were the cause of the injuries in 235 (42.1 %) patients and 35.8 % of these patients died. A total of 215 (38.5 %) patients were injured due to falls and 30.2 % of these patients died. Patients who had sustained falls were significantly older than patents with other injury mechanisms (p < 0.001, CI = 13.0-20.2). The proportion of patients with penetrating injuries was 7.3 %. CONCLUSION: The incidence of severely injured patients was 30/100000/year. Men and elderly people had a higher risk of getting severely injured. Falls were the dominating injury mechanism among elderly.

Abbreviated Injury Scale↗

PubMed2004

Failure rates for 4762 revision total hip arthroplasties in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.

We present the results for 4762 revision total hip arthroplasties with no previous infection in the hip, which were reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register between 1987 and 2003. The ten-year failure rate for revised prostheses was 26% (95% CI 25 to 26). Cox regression analyses were undertaken separately for acetabular and femoral revision components. Cemented revision components without allograft was the reference category. For acetabular components, we found a significantly reduced risk of failure for uncemented revisions both with (relative risk (RR) = 0.66; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.99) and without (RR = 0.37; 95% CI 0.22 to 0.61) allograft. For femoral components, we found a significantly reduced risk of failure for uncemented revisions, both with (RR = 0.27; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.46) and without (RR = 0.22; 95% CI 0.11 to 0.46) unimpacted allograft. This reduced risk of failure also applied to cemented revision components with allograft (RR = 0.53; 95% CI 0.33 to 0.84) and with impaction bone grafting (RR = 0.34; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.62). Revision prostheses have generally inferior results when compared with primary prostheses. Recementation without allograft, and uncemented revision with bone impaction, were associated with worse results than the other revision techniques which we studied.

Aged↗

PubMed2002

The performance of two hydroxyapatite-coated acetabular cups compared with Charnley cups. From the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.

We have compared the survival of two hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated cups, 1208 Atoll hemispheric and 2641 Tropic threaded, with cemented Charnley all-polyethylene cups (16 021) using the Cox regression model. The Tropic cup used in combination with an alumina ceramic femoral head, had good results, similar to those of the Charnley cup. When used in combination with a stainless-steel head, however, the risk of revision beyond four years was increased 3.4 times for the Tropic cup compared with the Charnley cup (p < 0.001). Over the same period, the Atoll cup had an increased risk of revision of 3.8 times when used with the alumina heads (p < 0.001) and an increased risk of 6.1 times when used with stainless-steel heads (p < 0.001). Revision because of wear and osteolysis was more common with both types of HA-coated cup than with the Charnley cup. The rate of revision of the Atoll cup because of aseptic loosening was also increased. We found that HA-coated cups did not perform better than the Charnley cup.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

The type of cement and failure of total hip replacements.

Using data from the Norwegian Arthroplasty egister, we have assessed the survival of 17 323 primary Charnley hip prostheses in patients with osteoarthritis based upon the type of cement used for the fixation of the implant. Overall, 9.2% had been revised after follow-up for ten years; 71% of the failures involved aseptic loosening of the femoral component. We observed significantly increased rates of failure for prostheses inserted with CMW1 and CMW3 cements. Using implants fixed with gentamicin-containing Palacos cement as the reference, the adjusted Cox regression failure rate ratios were 1.1 (95% CI 0.9 to 1.4) for implants cemented with plain Palacos, 1.1 (95% CI 0.7 to 1.6) for Simplex, 2.1 (95% 1.5 to 2.9) for gentamicin-containing CMW1, 2.0 (95% CI 1.6 to 2.4) for plain CMW1 and 3.0 (95% CI 2.3 to 3.9) for implants fixed with CMW3 cement. The adjusted failure rate at ten years varied from 5.9% for implants fixed with gentamicin-containing Palacos to 17% for those fixed with CMW3.

Aged↗

PubMed2001

Hip disease and the prognosis of total hip replacements. A review of 53,698 primary total hip replacements reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1987-99.

We studied the rates of revision for 53,698 primary total hip replacements (THRs) in nine different groups of disease. Factors which have previously been shown to be associated with increased risk of revision, such as male gender, young age, or certain types of uncemented prosthesis, showed important differences between the diagnostic groups. Without adjustment for these factors we observed an increased risk of revision in patients with paediatric hip diseases and in a small heterogeneous 'other' group, compared with patients with primary osteoarthritis. Most differences were reduced or disappeared when an adjustment for the prognostic factors was made. After adjustment, an increased relative risk (RR) of revision compared with primary osteoarthritis was seen in hips with complications after fracture of the femoral neck (RR = 1.3, p = 0.0005), in hips with congenital dislocation (RR = 1.3, p = 0.03), and in the heterogenous 'other' group. The analyses were also undertaken in a more homogenous subgroup of 16,217 patients which had a Charnley prosthesis implanted with high-viscosity cement. The only difference in this group was an increased risk for revision in patients who had undergone THR for complications after fracture of the femoral neck (RR = 1.5, p = 0.0005). THR for diagnoses seen mainly among young patients had a good prognosis, but they had more often received inferior uncemented implants. If a cemented Charnley prosthesis is used, the type of disease leading to THR seems in most cases to have only a minor influence on the survival of the prosthesis.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2000

The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplasties.

In 1985, the Norwegian Orthopaedic Association decided to establish a national hip register, and the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register was started in 1987. In January 1994, it was extended to include all artificial joints. The main purpose of the register is to detect inferior results of implants as early as possible. All hospitals participate, and the orthopedic surgeons are supposed to report all primary operations and all revisions. Using the patient's unique national social security number, the revision can be linked to the primary operation, and survival analyses of the implants are done. In general, the survival analyses are performed with the Kaplan-Meier method or using Cox multiple regression analysis with adjustment for possible confounding factors such as age, gender, and diagnosis. Survival probabilities can be calculated for each of the prosthetic components. The end-point in the analyses is revision surgery, and we can assess the rate of revision due to specific causes like aseptic loosening, infection, or dislocation. Not only survival, but also pain, function, and satisfaction have been registered for subgroups of patients. We receive reports about more than 95% of the prosthesis operations. The register has detected inferior implants 3 years after their introduction, and several uncemented prostheses were abandoned during the early 1990s due to our documentation of poor performance. Further, our results also contributed to withdrawal of the Boneloc cement. The register has published papers on economy, prophylactic use of antibiotics, patients' satisfaction and function, mortality, and results for different hospital categories. In the analyses presented here, we have compared the results of primary cemented and uncemented hip prostheses in patients less than 60 years of age, with 0-11 years' follow-up. The uncemented circumferentially porous- or hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated femoral stems had better survival rates than the cemented ones. In young patients, we found that cemented cups had better survival than uncemented porous-coated cups, mainly because of higher rates of revision from wear and osteolysis among the latter. The uncemented HA-coated cups with more than 6 years of follow-up had an increased revision rate, compared to cemented cups due to aseptic loosening as well as wear and osteolysis. We now present new findings about the six commonest cemented acetabular and femoral components. Generally, the results were good, with a prosthesis survival of 95% or better at 10 years, and the differences among the prosthesis brands were small. Since the practice of using undocumented implants has not changed, the register will continue to survey these implants. We plan to assess the mid- and long-term results of implants that have so far had good short-term results.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed2000

Mortality after total hip replacement: 0-10-year follow-up of 39,543 patients in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.

We have studied the mortality after total hip replacement (THR) of 39,543 patients, having a mean age of 69 years, who were reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. The median follow-up time was 5.2 (0-10.4) years. 323 of 6201 deaths occurred during the first 60 postoperative days. The patient mortality was compared with the mortality in the Norwegian population, using standardized mortality ratios (SMR). The SMRs were compared and adjusted for age, gender, and other possible confounders in a Cox regression model incorporating the population mortality. We observed a lower mortality in patients with THR than in the Norwegian population (8-year patient mortality was 25%, versus 30% in the corresponding Norwegian population. SMR = 0.81). There was an increased standardized mortality ratio in patients less than 50 years (SMR = 2.50), patients 50-59 years (SMR = 1.16), patients with THR due to rheumatoid arthritis (SMR = 1.48), and patients with femoral neck fracture (SMR = 1.11). The SMR decreased with increasing age at the time of THR surgery. After revision surgery, the SMR was similar to that after the first primary operation, whereas a second primary operation in the opposite hip was associated with a further reduction in the SMR (SMR = 0.65). During the first 60 postoperative days, all patient categories had a higher mortality than the general population (0.8% mortality, SMR = 1.39).

Aged↗

PubMed1999

The effect of hospital-type and operating volume on the survival of hip replacements. A review of 39,505 primary total hip replacements reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, 1988-1996.

We investigated associations between the survival of total hip replacements (THRs), type of hospital and annual number of THRs per hospital. The study was based on 39,505 primary THRs reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register from 45 local (n 20,756), 15 central (n 12,455) and 10 university hospitals (n 6,294) during 1988-1996. The annual number of THRs was highest at central and university hospitals, both of which are training hospitals. University hospitals were further characterized by the lowest mean annual number of THRs performed per surgeon. For cemented THRs, with adjustment for gender, age, diagnosis, surgical procedure, and annual hospital volume, the revision rates at central and university hospitals were 0.8 (95% confidence interval: 0.67-0.95) and 1.2 (CI: 1.02-1.47) times that of local hospitals, respectively. A high annual number of cemented THRs per hospital was not associated with lower revision rates. In uncemented THRs, survival results were similar in central and local hospitals, whereas the adjusted revision rate at university hospitals was 1.6 (CI: 1.13-2.19) times that of local hospitals. The adjusted 6.5 year revision probability was 12% in hospitals performing < or = 10 uncemented THRs per year (n 606), 8% in hospitals performing from 18-28 operations (n 1,378) and 5% in hospitals performing > 84 operations (n 526).

Adult↗

PubMed1998

[406 femoral fractures in children].

406 fractures of the femur in persons younger than 17 years of age were treated at Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, from January 1980 to December 1993. The incidence was 35/100,000 per year; 57/100,000 for boys, and 24/100,000 for girls. No significant changes in the incidence occurred during the study period. 70% of the fractures occurred in boys. 78% had an isolated fracture, while 7% had other fractures, 7% head injuries and 8% injuries of multiple organs as well. Traffic accidents accounted for 35% of the fractures. 65% of the femur fractures were treated by skeletal traction (mean hospitalisation 30 days), 21% were operated on initially (hospitalisation 12 days), and 14% were given early spica cast (hospitalisation three days). The results of the treatment were generally satisfactory. Neither anisomelia (8.5% more than 10 mm) nor malrotation (12% more than 10 degrees) of the femur was a serious problem, but the length of time the patients were hospitalized was rather long.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1998

Mechanical effects of different localization of the point of entry in femoral nailing.

Twenty pairs of human femora were reamed alternatively on the right or left side, with the opposite side serving as the unreamed control. The fossa piriformis (group I) or tip of the greater trochanter (group II) were chosen for introduction of the intramedullary reamer (Howmedica type). The femora were tested in vertical compression in a MTS mechanical testing machine until failure. In group I, all femora fractured through the entry portal. This happened in only 3 out of 10 in group II, where 7 fractured through the medial part of the femoral neck remote from the portal. The difference is statistically significant. Reduction in strength between the unreamed control side and the reamed femur was median 1486 (23%) in group I and 506 N (11%) in group II. Reduction in energy absorption between the control side and reamed side was median 9786 Nm (44.5%) in group I and 1142 Nm (10.5%) in group II. The difference in energy absorption reduction between groups I and II was statistically significant (P = 0.04). We conclude that reaming through an entry point (portal) in the piriformis fossa weakens the femoral neck and creates a localizing point for fracture.

Aged↗

PubMed1998

Patient satisfaction and function after primary and revision total hip replacement.

This study assessed and compared satisfaction and function before and after total hip replacement as reported by 531 patients who had primary and revision surgery and 1087 patients who had primary surgery only. All operations were registered by the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register during the years 1987 to 1993, with time from last surgery to followup ranging from 0.6 to 6.4 years. Sixty-one percent of the patients who underwent revision surgery and 84% of the patients who did not undergo revision surgery rated their overall satisfaction with the hip implant as good or very good. With adjustment for primary diagnosis, gender, age, bilaterality, and time since the primary operation, a substantial benefit of total hip replacement was observed in both groups with regard to pain, walking ability, and need of help. However, improvement was less among patients who underwent revision total hip replacement than among those who did not undergo revision surgery. A deterioration was seen among patients who underwent revision surgery with regard to employment status and exercise habits.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Corrective osteotomies after injuries of the distal radial physis in children.

Six children had corrective osteotomies of the distal forearm because of growth disturbance from post-traumatic closure of the distal radial physis. Lengthening osteotomy of the radius was performed in three patients with grafts from the iliac crest. All osteotomies healed in a satisfactory position. Three patients had only moderate mal-angulation of the radius and were treated by shortening of the ulna. The median postoperative palmar angulation of the distal radius was 4 (0-13) degrees, the radial inclination 22 (15-28) degrees, and the ulnar variance was -2 (-4(-)+2) mm. The postoperative pain relief was complete in all patients and the total range of motion was 96 (93-100)% compared with the opposite side.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1997

Antibiotic prophylaxis in total hip arthroplasty. Review of 10,905 primary cemented total hip replacements reported to the Norwegian arthroplasty register, 1987 to 1995.

We have assessed the effect of different regimes of antibiotic prophylaxis on the survival of total hip implants, comparing antibiotics administered both systemically and in the bone cement, systemically only, in the bone cement only and with no antibiotics given. We studied 10,905 primary cemented total hip replacements, performed for osteoarthritis of the hip and reported to the Norwegian arthroplasty register between 1987 and 1995. Cox-estimated failure-rate ratios (FRR) are presented with adjustment for gender, age, the brand of cement, the prosthesis, the type of operating theatre and the operating time. For revisions performed for infection (39 operations), the lowest rate of revision was found among patients receiving antibiotic-containing cement plus systemic antibiotics (n = 5804). The revision rate for the 4586 patients receiving systemic antibiotics only was 4.3 times greater (95% CI 1.7 to 11.0, p = 0.001); in 239 with antibiotics in the bone cement only it was 6.3 times greater (CI 1.6 to 25.0, p = 0.003); and in the 276 who did not receive antibiotics it was by 11.5 times greater (CI 2.1 to 63.0, p = 0.002). Adjustment for the total amount of systemic antibiotic administered did not change the results. We also observed an increased revision rate for aseptic loosening (109 operations) comparing the systemic-only (FRR = 1.8, CI 1.1 to 2.9, p = 0.01) and the cement-only regimes (FRR = 2.6, CI 1.2 to 5.9, p = 0.02) with the combined dosage. Our findings show that systemic antibiotics combined with antibiotic-containing bone cement led to fewer revisions than the other methods.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis↗

PubMed1997

Patient-related risk factors for early revision of total hip replacements. A population register-based case-control study of 674 revised hips.

In this population register-based, matched case-control study, we assessed patient-related factors and early risk of revision after total hip replacement (THR). Information was obtained via a mall survey among patients reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register during the period 1987-1993. The study included 674 revised hips, as cases, and 1,343 hips with a primary operation only, as controls. Completed questionnaires were received from 81% of the 2,017 individual cases and controls. We identified a set of patient-related factors associated with poor THR prognosis. Increasing weight was a risk factor among male patients older than 67 years who were more than 1.77 m tall (p = 0.01). Smoking had no overall effect, but former heavy smokers had an increased risk of 2.8 compared to never-smokers. Alcohol intake was associated with an increased risk of dislocation. Revision due to infection was commoner among patients taking anti-diabetic drugs (OR = 14) than among patients taking no medication. An increased overall revision risk was found among patients using systemic steroids (OR = 2.8) or local pulmonary steroids (OR = 6.0). The risk also increased in male patients performing regular exercise before the primary operation (OR = 2.6), and in female patients of working-age doing heavy work (OR = 1.9).

Adolescent↗

PubMed1997

Exeter and charnley arthroplasties with Boneloc or high viscosity cement. Comparison of 1,127 arthroplasties followed for 5 years in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.

During the years 1991-1994, the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register recorded 1,324 primary hip arthroplasties implanted with the Boneloc cement. We have compared the survival until revision due to aseptic loosening for charnley (n 955) and Exeter (n 172) prostheses. The Boneloc cemented hips were also compared with high viscosity cemented hips implanted during the same period. In the Boneloc cemented group, the estimated probability of survival at 4.5 years of a Charnley femoral component was 74% and for an Exeter femoral component 97% (p < 0.0001). Using a Cox regression model with adjustment for age, gender, type of cement, systemic antibiotic and stratified for diagnosis, an 8 times higher risk of revision was found in Boneloc cemented Charnley femoral components than in Exeter femoral components (p < 0.0001). For the acetabular components, the difference between the Charnley and Exeter components with Boneloc cement was not statistically significant. In both the Charnley and the Exeter prostheses, the high viscosity cemented components had significantly better survival than the Boneloc cemented components. The Cox regression model showed that a Boneloc cemented Charnley femoral component had a 14 times higher risk of revision than a high viscosity cemented component (p < 0.0001), and for Exeter femoral components a 7 times higher revision risk was found in the Boneloc cemented components (p = 0.003). Our results confirm the previously reported inferior results of Charnley prostheses implanted with Boneloc cement and inferior results of Boneloc cemented Exeter prostheses as well, but less pronounced than for Charnley prostheses.

Aged↗

PubMed1996

[The hip registry. Good economy for society].

As many as 33,656 total hip arthroplasties (THA) have been recorded in the Norwegian Arthtroplasty Register from the start in September 1987 until January 1994. The annual costs for the about 5,500 THA performed in Norway (4.2 million inhabitants) are 72 million USD. We have documented before that some types of uncemented prostheses (Ti-Fit/ Bio-Fit (cup/stem) and Coxa/Femora) and types of cements (low-viscosity and Boneloc) show higher revision rates than others do. In this paper the costs of these "inferior" implants are estimated. The "inferior" implants were compared with a reference-THA (the Charnley prosthesis with antibiotic-containing high viscosity cement and with systemic antibiotic-prophylaxis (n = 4,970)). In addition, based on data in the literature, comparisons have been made for two earlier commonly used prostheses in Norway: The Christiansen prosthesis (n = 6,500) and the Wagner double-cup prosthesis (n = 2,200). For the period 1987-93, the annual over-all extra cost of using other implants than the reference-THA was 1.71 mill. USD for the first 3-5 years postoperatively. For the Christiansen and the Wagner prostheses the annual extra costs were estimated to 2.65 and 2.38 mill. USD respectively. By documenting poor results early the Register helps to stop the use of the inferior prostheses and cements, and thus reduce both the number of revisions, and, most important, the suffering of the patients.

Costs and Cost Analysis↗

PubMed1996

[Quality control of prosthetic replacements of knee, ankle, toe, shoulder, elbow and finger joints in Norway 1994. A report after the first year of registration of joint prostheses in the national registry].

Total hip replacements have been recorded in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register since 1987, and recording of the other joint arthroplasties was started in January 1994. After 12 months 1,589 primary arthroplasties had been registered; these referred to 962 knees, 11 ankles, 76 toes, 113 shoulders, 69 elbows, 12 wrists, 335 fingers and 11 carpometacarpal 1 joints. Median age of the patients was 70 years. 80% were women. Rheumatoid arthritis was the predominant reason for joint replacement, except in the case of the knees where the dominant cause was osteoarthrosis (71%) and of shoulders, 28% of which were replaced because of fractures. Cement was used in 83% of the primary arthroplasties in knee, ankle, shoulder, and elbow joints. 74% of the cement types used contained antibiotics. 9% were uncemented and 8% hybrids. 97% were given systemic antibiotic prophylaxis, most commonly first generation cephalosporins. 114 reoperations were reported. The reason was aseptic loosening in 56%, and infection in 15%. The cooperation with Norwegian orthopaedic surgeons is good. The Register thus provides a reliable picture of implants of Norway, and a good basis for future follow-up studies.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

[Total hip arthroplasty after femoral neck fractures. Results from the national registry on joint prostheses].

From September 1987 to January 1994, data on 3,876 total hip arthroplasties performed because of previous hip fracture were collected in the Norwegian arthroplasty register. During the same period, 19,654 patients received total hip arthroplasties because of osteoarthrosis. The results of total hip arthroplasties after an earlier hip fracture were compared with prostheses in patients who were operated on because of primary osteoarthrosis. After five years the cumulative percentage failure was 4.1 in the fracture group and 3.7 in the arthrosis group (p = 0.19). After adjustment for differences in sex and age distribution in the Cox model, the fracture patients were shown to have 1.35 times higher risk of revision when compared with the osteoarthrosis patients (p = 0.008). The reasons for reoperation differed, however, in the two groups. More of the fracture patients than of the osteoarthrosis patients had to be reoperated because of dislocation or femoral shaft fracture, while fewer needed reoperation because the acetabular component had loosened.

Adult↗