PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L B Mayers

Publications and source records attributed to L B Mayers.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Self-reported symptoms and exercise-induced asthma in the elite athlete.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare self-reported symptoms for exercise-induced asthma (EIA) to postexercise challenge pulmonary function test results in elite athletes. METHODS: Elite athletes (N = 158; 83 men and 75 women; age: 22 +/- 4.4 yr) performed pre- and post-exercise spirometry and were grouped according to postexercise pulmonary function decrements (PFT-positive, PFT-borderline, and PFT-normal for EIA). Before the sport/environment specific exercise challenge, subjects completed an EIA symptoms-specific questionnaire. RESULTS: Resting FEV1 values were above predicted values (114--121%) and not different between groups. Twenty-six percent of the study population demonstrated >10% postexercise drop in FEV1 and 29% reported two or more symptoms. However, the proportion of PFT-positive and PFT-normal athletes reporting two or more symptoms was not different (39% vs. 41%). Postrace cough was the most reported symptom, reported significantly more frequently for PFT-positive athletes (P < 0.05). Sensitivity/specificity analysis demonstrated a lack of effectiveness of self-reported symptoms to identify PFT-positive or exclude PFT-normal athletes. Postexercise lower limit reference ranges (MN-2SDs) were determined from normal athletes for FEV1, FEF25--75% and PEF to be -7%, -12.5%, and -18%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although questionnaires provide reasonable estimates of EIA prevalence among elite cold-weather athletes, the use of self-reported symptoms for EIA diagnosis in this population will likely yield high frequencies of both false positive and false negative results. Diagnosis should include spirometry using an exercise/environment specific challenge in combination with the athlete's history of asthma symptoms.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Exercise-induced asthma screening of elite athletes: field versus laboratory exercise challenge.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare a laboratory based exercise challenge (LBC) to a field based exercise challenge (FBC) for pulmonary function test (PFT) exercise-induced asthma (EIA) screening of elite athletes. METHODS: Twenty-three elite cold weather athletes (14 men, 9 women) PFT positive for EIA (FBC screened) served as subjects. Twenty-three gender and sport matched controls (nonasthmatics) were randomly selected to establish PFT reference values for normal elite athletes. Before FBC, athletes completed a medical history questionnaire for EIA symptoms. FBC evaluations consisted of baseline spirometry, actual or simulated competition, and 5, 10, and 15 min postexercise spirometry. PFT positive athletes were evaluated in the laboratory using an exercise challenge simulating race intensity (ambient conditions: 21 degrees C, 60% relative humidity). PFT procedures were identical to FBC. RESULTS: 91% of PFT positive and 48% of PFT normal athletes reported at least one symptom of EIA, with postrace cough most frequent. Baseline spirometry was the same for PFT positives and normal controls. Lower limit reference range (MN - 2 SD) of FEV1 for controls suggests that postexercise decrements of greater than approximately -7% indicate abnormal airway response in this population. Exercise time duration did not effect bronchial reactivity; 78% of FBC PFT positives were PFT normal post-LBC. CONCLUSION: Self-reported symptoms by elite athletes are not reliable in identifying EIA. Reference range criterion for FEV1 decrement in the elite athlete postexercise contrasts current recommended guidelines. Moreover, a large number of false negatives may occur in this population if EIA screening is performed with inadequate exercise and environmental stress.

Adolescent↗