PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L B McCullough

Publications and source records attributed to L B McCullough.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

Ethically justified guidelines for family planning interventions to prevent pregnancy in female patients with chronic mental illness.

OBJECTIVE: This article proposes ethically justified clinical guidelines for family planning interventions to prevent pregnancy in female patients. STUDY DESIGN: We reviewed literature on family planning and consequences of pregnancy in patients with chronic mental illness and related that literature to ethical principles. RESULTS: Patients with chronic mental illness are ethically unique because they have chronically and variably impaired autonomy. Existing guidelines and proposals for family planning interventions for mentally retarded patients are shown not to apply to such patients. CONCLUSION: Three sets of guidelines for three groups of patients, representing the continuum of chronically and variably impaired autonomy, are proposed: (1) a set of guidelines for patients who can achieve thresholds of autonomy, (2) a set of guidelines for patients irreversibly near thresholds of autonomy, and (3) a set of guidelines for patients irreversibly below thresholds of autonomy. These guidelines should contribute significantly to the quality of obstetric and gynecologic care for female patients with chronic mental illness.

Comprehension↗
PubMed1991

The fetus as patient: implications for directive versus nondirective counseling for fetal benefit.

The authors provide an ethical account of the fetus as patient and identify the implications of that account for directive versus nondirective counseling for fetal benefit. They argue that such an account cannot be grounded in the independent moral status of the fetus. Instead, the concept of the fetus as patient is best understood in terms of the principle of beneficence. On the basis of this principle, the fetus is a patient depending on whether links can be established between the fetus and the child it can become. The viable fetus is a patient. Directive counseling for fetal benefit of the viable fetus is appropriate, provided that it takes account of the presence and severity of fetal anomalies, extreme prematurity, and obligations to the pregnant woman. The previable fetus, including the in vitro embryo and the near-viable fetus, is a patient solely as a function of the pregnant woman's autonomous decision to confer such status. If she confers such status, the fetus is a patient and directive counseling is appropriate, provided that it takes account of the factors noted above. If she denies such status, the fetus is not a patient and nondirective counseling is appropriate.

Beneficence↗
PubMed1991

The values history. The evaluation of the patient's values and advance directives.

Autonomous decision making by patients can be enhanced by a variety of advance directives. These directives, the living will and the durable power of attorney, have an ethical and legal basis on which the patient can prospectively make decisions about life-sustaining therapies. The strength of these directives can be enhanced by the use of the Values History, serving as an adjunct to them. The Values History can also be used as a clinical tool to elicit the values of the patient as they pertain to chronic as well as critical medical care. Documentation of the patient's values will give the health care team a fuller understanding of the patient's preferences and directions.

Advance Directives↗
PubMed1991

Are physicians obligated to treat indigent patients?

Are physicians obligated to treat indigent patients? Three possible responses to this question are examined: (1) "No! Health care is the property of the physician to sell as he or she sees fit"; (2) "Yes, out of charity"; and (3) "Yes, out of justice." The first response is shown to be indefensible on the basis of an analysis of natural rights to property and freedom. The second response is defensible but applies only at the microlevel of the patient-physician relationship. Thus, physicians are obligated to care for indigent patients to some reasonable degree. The third response is defensible and applies at the macrolevel of public policy. Physicians are obligated to play a crucial role at this level--a role that has been largely neglected.

Charities↗
PubMed1990

Selective reduction of multifetal pregnancies.

Selective reduction was carried out in 46 multifetal pregnancies by means of potassium chloride injection into the pericardial region of the fetus. There were three indications for the procedure: to improve perinatal outcome and to increase the likelihood that a term infant would be born in a multifetal pregnancy (34 women); to allow the birth of a healthy infant without the birth of a congenitally abnormal coexisting fetus (8 women); and to preserve a singleton pregnancy when the woman would otherwise have the whole pregnancy terminated (4 women). Of the 80 fetuses left after reduction 75 (94%) have survived. In 3 cases ultrasound scanning showed cardiac activity in the injected fetus 20-30 min after the initial injection despite 2 min of asystole immediately after the injection; repeated injection, carried out the same day, led to fetal death in all 3 cases. Selective reduction of multifetal pregnancies for the three indications described is an ethically justifiable option for the management of multifetal pregnancy, to which there are no public policy obstacles.

Congenital Abnormalities↗
PubMed1990

Clinical guides to preventing ethical conflicts between pregnant women and their physicians.

We provide a justification for preventive ethics in obstetric practice. Four clinical guides to resolving ethical conflicts between pregnant women and their physicians can be identified: (1) informed consent as an ongoing dialogue between the pregnant woman and her physician, (2) negotiation as a clinical strategy, (3) respectful persuasion as a clinical strategy, and (4) the proper use of ethics committees.

Beneficence↗
PubMed1990

Does obstetric ethics have any role in the obstetrician's response to the abortion controversy?

We defend the view that the obstetrician's response to the abortion controversy cannot be based on accounts of the independent moral status of the fetus, because all such accounts are irresolvably disputable. That response, however, can be based on an account of the dependent moral status of the fetus. For such an account the central question is, "When is the fetus a patient?" Viable fetuses are patients. Nonviable third-trimester fetuses are not patients. Previable fetuses are patients solely as a function of the woman's autonomous decision to confer such status. The abortion of a viable fetus is, with few exceptions, never ethically justified, because it is a patient. The abortion of nonviable third-trimester fetuses (i.e., premature termination of pregnancy) is justified when the pregnant women consents to it. Abortion of the previable fetus is justifiable when the pregnant women consents to it. We distinguish between professional and private conscience. We identify the limits of the former and the legitimate role of the latter, especially in the area of religious beliefs. Finally, we address the implications of our view for residency training programs. The most important of these implications is that requiring all residents to perform abortions is ethically unjustifiable.

Abortion, Induced↗
PubMed1990

Informed consent and the "medical student psychiatrist".

The involvement of medical students in the clinical assessment of psychiatry patients raises concerns that have ethical and possibly legal implications. Responses to a 1986 questionnaire by 91 departments of clinical psychiatry in U.S. medical schools reveal that a substantial proportion (29.3%) of these departments were not fully compliant with established guidelines for obtaining informed consent from patients for students' participation in the patients' assessment and psychiatric care. Medical educators in psychiatry should recognize the importance of consent as a topic in the educational process and should establish policies that correct the discrepancies between institutional practices and informed consent guidelines.

Disclosure↗
PubMed1990

An ethically justified, clinically comprehensive management strategy for third-trimester pregnancies complicated by fetal anomalies.

We present an ethically justified, clinically comprehensive management strategy for third-trimester pregnancies complicated by fetal anomalies, based on 72 cases diagnosed at a gestational age of more than 24 weeks. These cases are organized into three categories: A) nonaggressive management and termination of pregnancy offered, three of 72 (4%); B) aggressive and nonaggressive management offered, 18 of 72 (25%); and C) aggressive management recommended, 51 of 72 (71%). We then ethically justify a clinically comprehensive management strategy. First, we describe the disclosure requirements of the informed-consent process. Second, we provide an ethical justification for the physician's recommendations among management alternatives. The justification for such recommendations is based on a continuum of beneficence-based obligations to the fetus that is developed in terms of a classification scheme of fetal anomalies, based on the degree of probability of antenatal diagnosis and degree of probability of outcome. When there are no beneficence-based obligations to the fetus, the physician should recommend only termination of pregnancy or nonaggressive management. When there are minimal beneficence-based obligations to the fetus, only aggressive or nonaggressive management should be recommended. Finally, when there are more than minimal beneficence-based obligations to the fetus, only aggressive management should be recommended.

Abortion, Eugenic↗
PubMed1989

Nonaggressive obstetric management. An option for some fetal anomalies during the third trimester.

Nonaggressive obstetric management was used in 13 cases of anomalous fetuses during the third trimester. Criteria that define these anomalies are (1) a very high probability of a correct diagnosis and (2) either (a) a very high probability of death as an outcome of the anomaly diagnosed or (b) a very high probability of severe and irreversible deficit of cognitive developmental capacity as a result of the anomaly diagnosed. On the basis of two approaches to obstetric ethics, we defend the legitimacy of nonaggressive management of third-trimester pregnancies complicated by fetal anomalies that meet these criteria.

Beneficence↗