L Baclig | PubMed Health

PubMed1992

Evaluation of two epoxy ether compounds for biocompatible potential.

Bovine arterial tissue exposed to two epoxy ether compounds (Denacol EX-313 and Denacol EX-810) was evaluated for its biocompatible potential by in vitro and in vivo test procedures. The battery of test procedures included percent Inhibition of Cell Growth, Medium Eluate Method (MEM), Agar Overlay (AO), Blood Compatibility, Acute Mouse Systemic Injection, Rabbit Intracutaneous Irritation, Rabbit Subcutaneous Implantation, Guinea Pig Maximization, and Ames Tests. The epoxy exposed tissue was found to be noncytotoxic, nonmutagenic, and biocompatible by the test methods employed. In addition, the maximum concentrations of the unreacted Denacol EX-313 and EX-810 solutions found to demonstrate noncytotoxic reactions by the MEM and AO procedures were identified as 55 and 60 ppm for the MEM and 150 and 200 ppm for the AO procedure, respectively. These studies suggest that Denacol EX-313 and EX-810 are acceptable solutions for the processing of implantable tissue provided the epoxy residuals remain below those levels found to be cytotoxic.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Evaluation of epoxy ether fixed bovine arterial grafts for mutagenic potential.

Two epoxy ether compounds [glycerol polyglycidyl ether (Denacol EX-313) and ethylene glycol diglycidyl ether (Denacol EX-810)] are under consideration as alternatives to glutaraldehyde for use in the processing of an arterial graft. The two are utilized as cross-linking and sterilant agents, respectively. Epoxy resins are multifunctional alkylating agents, and bifunctional alkylating epoxide solutions are known to be mutagenic. The correlation between mutagenic potential and carcinogenicity, in addition to evidence that diepoxides are carcinogenic in mice and rats, prompted the evaluation of the mutagenic potential of the epoxy treated, clinically rinsed graft. Ames and sister chromatid exchange (SCE) test procedures were used to assess mutagenic potential. Normal saline and distilled water were selected as the most physiologically representative and procedurally acceptable extraction mediums for the Ames and SCE tests, respectively. The results of the Ames and SCE tests in both the activated and non activated systems indicated that there were no statistically significant differences detected between various test article concentrates and the spontaneous mutation controls for both the activated and non activated systems. The epoxy treated graft was determined to be non mutagenic and demonstrated no dose related responses by these methods.

Animals↗