PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L Beauclair

Publications and source records attributed to L Beauclair.

18 recordsLinked to original sources

A Canadian multicenter, double-blind study of paroxetine and fluoxetine in major depressive disorder.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have suggested clinical differences among selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. In a 12-week randomized, multicenter, double-blind trial, the antidepressant and anxiolytic efficacy of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors paroxetine and fluoxetine was compared in patients with moderate to severe depression. METHODS: A total of 203 patients were randomized to fixed doses (20 mg/day) of paroxetine or fluoxetine for the first six weeks of therapy. From week 7-12, dosing could be adjusted biweekly, as required (paroxetine 20-50 mg/day, and fluoxetine 20-80 mg/day). The mean prescribed doses were paroxetine 25.5 mg/day (range 20.0-40.2 mg/day), and fluoxetine 27.5 mg/day (range 20.0-59.5 mg/day). Emergence of motor nervousness or restlessness was assessed using the ESRS scale for akathisia. RESULTS: Both active treatments demonstrated comparable antidepressant efficacy (HAM-D, CGI). Anxiolytic activity of the two drugs (COVI, STAI, HAM-D) was also comparable. However, paroxetine was found to be superior to fluoxetine on two subscore measures at week 1 of therapy (HAM-D Agitation item, p < 0.05; Psychic Anxiety item, p < 0.05), with no differences detected after week 2. The overall incidence of adverse effects was comparable in the two treatment groups. Constipation, dyspepsia, tremor, sweating and abnormal ejaculation were more common in paroxetine-treated subjects, whereas nausea and nervousness were more frequent in fluoxetine-treated patients. Weight loss was more common in the fluoxetine versus paroxetine group (11.88% versus 2.94%, respectively). ESRS scores for akathisia were low throughout the study and showed little change. LIMITATIONS: Differences observed between the two drugs in antianxiety effects were limited to two measures of anxiety among several others. DISCUSSION: The data indicate that paroxetine and fluoxetine have comparable antidepressant and anxiolytic efficacy. Paroxetine appears to produce an earlier improvement in agitation and psychic anxiety symptoms compared with fluoxetine.

Adult↗

Phase-IV multicentre clinical study of risperidone in the treatment of outpatients with schizophrenia. The RIS-CAN-3 Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: Since most clinical trials of atypical antipsychotics have been conducted in hospitalized patients, a Phase-IV, multicentre, 8-week, open-label, flexible-dose study was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of risperidone in outpatients with schizophrenia. METHOD: Three hundred and thirty patients with a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III-R) diagnosis of schizophrenia were enrolled at 61 Canadian sites. Upon trial entry, the patients had their neuroleptic and antiparkinsonian drugs discontinued, and treatment with risperidone was initiated at a dose of 2 mg daily, then increased by 2 mg daily on each of the 2 following days until the initial target dose of 6 mg daily was reached on day 3. No further titration was allowed until day 14, after which the dose could be increased or decreased. RESULTS: During the stabilization phase (days 14-56), the dose was unchanged in 44% of the patients, increased in 24%, decreased in 23%, and titrated both up and down in 9% of the patients. In the efficacy-evaluable population (n = 292), treatment with risperidone produced substantial (-26.4) and significant (P = 0.0001) improvement in the total Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) score. At the end of the study (week 8), 85% of patients were classified as clinically improved according to an a priori definition (that is, 20% or more decrease from baseline in total PANSS score). On their last study visit, 75% of patients reported their experience with risperidone as better than their previous neuroleptic therapy. Risperidone was generally well tolerated. The adverse events reported by more than 5% of the patients were insomnia, nausea, headache, somnolence, dizziness, fatigue, anxiety, vomiting, and ejaculation disorder. Seventy-four percent of the reported treatment-related adverse events were recorded during the first 2 weeks of the trial, possibly because of the discontinuation of prior neuroleptic and antiparkinsonian drugs followed by immediate upward titration of risperidone. However, only 8.5% of adverse events were reported to have occurred during week 3, and only 0.8% of adverse events were reported for week 8. Risperidone treatment produced significant improvements over baseline in the incidence and severity of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). A slight but statistically significant increase in body weight was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this open-label, Phase-IV trial in a large population of outpatients with schizophrenia found that risperidone was superior to the neuroleptics that patients had previously taken in terms of efficacy and severity of EPS. Our results suggest the use of risperidone at lower doses in outpatients with schizophrenia.

Adolescent↗

Moclobemide versus fluoxetine in the treatment of major depressive disorder in adults.

The objective of the present study was to compare the safety and efficacy of moclobemide versus fluoxetine in adult patients with major depressive disorder. The design of the study was a multicenter, double-blind, comparative, and randomized trial. A 1- to 2-week single-blind placebo washout phase was followed by 6 weeks of double-blind treatment with moclobemide or fluoxetine. A total of 150 patients were enrolled in the study. There were 128 patients eligible to be randomized, with 66 patients receiving moclobemide and 62 patients receiving fluoxetine. At the termination of the study, patients in the moclobemide group were receiving a mean dose of 440 mg +/- 123 mg, while the mean dose in the fluoxetine group was 35 mg +/- 8 mg. No significant treatment differences were found for any of the efficacy parameters. Headache and nausea were the most frequently reported adverse events in both treatment groups. Headache and blurred vision were reported significantly more often (P < 0.05) in the fluoxetine group, whereas significantly more dry mouth was reported (P < 0.05) in the moclobemide group. These results provide supporting evidence of the comparable efficacy of moclobemide and fluoxetine and the better tolerability of moclobemide when used in the treatment of major depressive disorder.

Adult↗

Potentiation of fluoxetine by aminoglutethimide, an adrenal steroid suppressant, in obsessive-compulsive disorder resistant to SSRIs: a case report.

1. The role of serotonin in the aetiology of obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) has been established through considerable indirect evidence (Landry and Chouinard, 1990). The strongest evidence comes from the fact that drugs known to be serotonin-selective reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have been found to be useful in the pharmacotherapy of OCD (Landry and Chouinard, 1990). 2. The authors investigated a new treatment approach by adding an adrenal steroid suppressant to a SSRI, fluoxetine, in the case of a severe obsessive-compulsive patient who was drug-resistant to clomipramine and SSRIs. 3. We found that the combination of aminoglutethimide 250 mg qid and fluoxetine 40 mg die significantly improved the patient's condition. Moreover, during a four and a half year period, each time we tried to decrease either fluoxetine or the steroid suppressant, the patient started to relapse, suggesting that the adrenal steroid suppressant had a potentiating effect on the SSRI.

Aminoglutethimide↗

A double-blind controlled study of intramuscular zuclopenthixol acetate and liquid oral haloperidol in the treatment of schizophrenic patients with acute exacerbation.

We carried out a 9-day double-blind clinical trial comparing intramuscular zuclopenthixol acetate with liquid oral haloperidol in the treatment of 40 newly admitted schizophrenic patients with acute exacerbation. A parallel-group design was used with stratification by sex. Zuclopenthixol acetate (50 to 150 mg) was given intramuscularly every 3 days, whereas liquid haloperidol (10 to 30 mg daily) was given orally three times a day, with supplementary doses of each medication given under double-blind conditions when needed for agitation. No other sedative drugs, including benzodiazepines, were administered. The mean daily dose was 18.9 mg for haloperidol as compared with a mean dose per 3 days of 117.6 mg for zuclopenthixol. The two treatments were found to be equally efficacious on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and Clinical Global Impression Scale. Both drugs induced similar extrapyramidal side effects. However, more tremors were associated with zuclopenthixol as was a tendency for tardive dyskinesia to be unmasked at the end of the injection interval. Sedation was higher with zuclopenthixol acetate than with haloperidol. Serum creatinine phosphokinase levels were not significantly increased after zuclopenthixol injections. The results of this trial suggest that zuclopenthixol acetate given intramuscularly every second to third day offers an alternative to conventional liquid oral haloperidol in the management of acute schizophrenia.

Acute Disease↗

Clonazepam in the treatment of panic disorder: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial investigating the correlation between clonazepam concentrations in plasma and clinical response.

Thirty-two outpatients with a DSM-III diagnosis of panic disorder or agoraphobia with panic attacks were randomly assigned to 4 weeks of treatment with clonazepam or placebo, after a 1-week placebo washout period. Twenty-nine patients entered the double-blind phase of the study and were eligible for intent-to-treat analysis. Clonazepam-treated patients experienced significantly fewer panic attacks, and these were of lesser intensity and short duration than those in placebo-treated patients (p < 0.001). Clonazepam was also superior to placebo with respect to symptoms of anxiety and depression (p < 0.001). The mean dose of clonazepam at week 4 was 2.2 mg (standard deviation, 0.7 mg). There was significant (p < 0.05) correlation between drug concentration in plasma and decrease in the global measure of the severity of panic disorder (r = 0.68); similar trends were seen for the decreases in frequency (r = 0.60) and severity (r = 0.55) of panic attacks, but not between concentration in plasma and decline in generalized anxiety. The most common adverse event was drowsiness, which occurred in 9 of 13 clonazepam-treated patients.

Adult↗

A Canadian multicenter placebo-controlled study of fixed doses of risperidone and haloperidol in the treatment of chronic schizophrenic patients.

In a double-blind study, 135 inpatients with a diagnosis of chronic schizophrenia were randomly assigned to 8 weeks of treatment with one of six parallel treatments: risperidone (a new central 5-hydroxytryptamine2 and dopamine D2 antagonist), 2, 6, 10, 16 mg/day; haloperidol, 20 mg/day; or placebo, after a single-blind placebo washout period. Doses were increased in fixed increments up to a fixed maintenance dose reached after 1 week. On the Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness and Improvement, all active medications were superior to placebo except for risperidone (2 mg) on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement. On the total Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) score and positive subscale, superiority to placebo was observed for all treatment groups except for haloperidol and risperidone (2 mg), which tended to be superior to placebo on total PANSS and the positive subscale, respectively. On the PANSS negative subscale, only risperidone (6 mg/day) was significantly better than placebo. Risperidone (6 mg) was superior to haloperidol on the total PANSS, General Psychopathology, and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale subscales. Although there was a linear increase in parkinsonism with increasing risperidone dosage, there were no statistically significant differences between risperidone (2, 6, and 16 mg/day) and placebo. At doses of 6 to 16 mg, risperidone displayed a marked antidyskinetic effect compared with placebo. This effect was more pronounced in patients with severe dyskinesia. By contrast, haloperidol produced significantly more parkinsonism than placebo and risperidone (2, 6 and 16 mg), with no effect on tardive dyskinesia. These data suggest that risperidone, at the optimal therapeutic dose of 6 mg/day, produced significant improvement in both positive and negative symptoms without an increase in drug-induced parkinsonian symptoms and with a significant beneficial effect on tardive dyskinesia.

Adult↗

A pilot study of magnesium aspartate hydrochloride (Magnesiocard) as a mood stabilizer for rapid cycling bipolar affective disorder patients.

1. Nine severe rapid cycling manic-depressive patients were treated with a magnesium preparation, Magnesiocard 40 mEq/day in an open label study for a period up to 32 weeks. 2. Magnesiocard was found to have clinical results at least equivalent to those of lithium in about 50% of these patients. These results were obtained in an exploratory study and should be interpreted with caution. 3. The possibility that Magnesiocard could replace or improve the efficacy of lithium as a preventive treatment of manic-depressive illness merits further clinical investigation.

Aspartic Acid↗

Zopiclone and triazolam in insomnia associated with generalized anxiety disorder: a placebo-controlled evaluation of efficacy and daytime anxiety.

In a double-blind placebo-controlled study, following a 1 week washout, 75 outpatients suffering from generalized anxiety disorder with severe insomnia as the target symptom were randomly assigned to 4 weeks of treatment with zopiclone 7.5 mg, triazolam 0.5 mg or placebo at bedtime. Zopiclone was significantly better than placebo on most sleep parameters. Triazolam tended to be superior to placebo, but its superiority was significant only on the sleep induction factor. Triazolam-treated patients presented significantly more day-time-interdose anxiety than zopiclone as assessed by the weekly HARS and Clinical Global Assessment of Anxiety. Although daytime-interdose anxiety was observed with both drugs, this treatment emergent symptom was more frequent and severe with triazolam. Side-effects were of a mild to moderate intensity for both zopiclone and triazolam; however, taste perversion frequently appeared with zopiclone. Although both drugs share similar pharmacological properties and bind to benzodiazepine receptors, they differ significantly with respect to side-effects and daytime anxiety.

Adult↗

Valproic acid and panic disorder.

Valproic acid (VA), an anticonvulsant which increases GABAergic transmission was given to patients suffering from recurrent panic attacks. Ten consecutive outpatients were included in this study. After a seven day placebo washout period, patients were given a dose of 500 mg/day, which was gradually increased to a maximum of 2250 mg/day. A significant improvement was found in the symptomatology of patients as measured on the Clinical Global Impression Scale for panic severity (p less than 0.001), the Hamilton Psychiatric Rating Scale for Anxiety (p less than 0.001) and the panic factor of the SCL-90 (p less than 0.05). These findings support the hypothesis that VA is useful in the treatment of panic disorders. Further research should be carried out to assess its efficacy and safety.

Adult↗

Mesolimbic dopaminergic supersensitivity following electrical kindling of the amygdala.

Limbic seizures developed in rats following daily electrical stimulation of the basolateral nucleus of the amygdala. Animals were designated as "kindled" after five complete (stage 5) behavioral seizures were observed. A subgroup, designated as "superkindled," received three additional weeks of electrical stimulations. Kindled rats were significantly subsensitive to the stereotypy-inducing effects of apomorphine, a direct dopamine agonist, compared to controls. Superkindled rats were supersensitive to the effects of apomorphine. However, both kindled and superkindled rats demonstrated an increase in 3H-spiperone Bmax values, reflecting dopamine D2-receptor densities, in the nucleus accumbens ipsilateral to the stimulating electrode. The number of interictal spikes recorded from the stimulating amygdaloid electrode during the last week of kindling was correlated with changes in apomorphine sensitivity in individual animals.

Amygdala↗

Comparison of withdrawal of buspirone and diazepam: a placebo controlled study.

In a 8-week double-blind placebo controlled study, 48 outpatients with generalized anxiety disorder were randomized to diazepam, buspirone, a non-benzodiazepine anxiolytic, or placebo. During the treatment phase of 4 weeks duration diazepam was found to be significantly better than placebo and buspirone. Following abrupt withdrawal by placebo substitution the diazepam group showed a gradual relapse maximal after two weeks while the buspirone and the placebo groups did not differ. There were more cases of rebound anxiety with diazepam as compared to buspirone or placebo. In addition, there were three early terminations related to rebound anxiety in the diazepam group while there were none in the placebo and buspirone groups. There were significantly more new symptoms in the diazepam group than in the placebo or buspirone group.

Adult↗