Treatment of hepatoportal venous thrombosis: the role of anticoagulation.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to L Blendis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: The renin-angiotensin system may be implicated in the subtle sodium handling abnormality in preascitic cirrhosis. AIMS: To assess the role of angiotensin II in sodium homoeostasis in preascitic cirrhosis, using losartan, its receptor antagonist. PATIENTS: Nine male, preascitic cirrhotic patients, and six age matched, healthy male controls. METHODS: A dose response study using 2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10 mg of losartan was performed on a daily 200 mmol sodium intake, followed by repeat studies with the optimal dose, 7.5 mg of losartan, to determine its effects on systemic and renal haemodynamics, renal sodium handling, and neurohumoral factors. RESULTS: Preascitic cirrhotic patients had significantly reduced baseline urinary sodium excretion compared with controls (154 (8) versus 191 (12) mmol/day, p<0.05), associated with significantly reduced systemic angiotensin II levels (6.0 (1.7) versus 39.5 (10.0) pmol/l, p=0.002). Losartan 7.5 mg normalised renal sodium handling in the preascitic cirrhotic patients (202 (12) mmol/day, p=0.05 versus baseline), without any change in systemic or renal haemodynamics, but with significantly increased systemic angiotensin II levels (7.8 (2.3) pmol/l, p=0.05 versus baseline). Losartan had no effect on renal sodium handling in controls. CONCLUSIONS: In preascitic cirrhotic patients, the subtle renal sodium retention, paradoxically associated with low systemic neurohumoral factor levels, is improved with low dose losartan, suggesting the involvement of angiotensin II via its direct action on the renal tubule.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: The long-term effects of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts on renal sodium excretion are not known. We sought to determine these long-term effects, as well as to measure the effects of a sodium load in patients who are free of ascites. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Ten patients with cirrhosis who had been successfully treated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt for refractory ascites were studied before the shunt and again at 6 and 14 months after the shunt while on a 22 mmol sodium/day diet. At 14 months they were also studied on a 200 mmol sodium/day diet for 7 days without diuretics. Renal sodium handling, central blood volume, neurohumoral factors, and hepatic function were measured. RESULTS: Sodium balance was negative at 6 months (urinary sodium excretion [mean +/- SD] 51 +/- 11 mmol/day versus 7 +/- 2 mmol/day pre-shunt; P < 0.05), was maintained at 14 months (22 +/- 4 mmol/day; P < 0.05 versus pre-shunt), and was associated with normalization of renin activity and aldosterone levels, but not norepinephrine levels, as well as significantly improved renal hemodynamic measurements. Sodium loading with 200 mmol/day resulted in weight gain associated with increased central blood volume and appropriate renal sodium handling in most but not all patients (urinary sodium excretion 188 +/- 14 mmol/day), despite persistent nonsuppressibility of sympathetic hyperactivity. CONCLUSIONS: In cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites treated with a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt, long-term renal sodium handling is improved. Adequate intravascular filling in ascites-free cirrhotic patients with normal portal pressure permits an improved but not normalized renal response to a sodium load, possibly due to persistently elevated sympathetic activity. Therefore, these patients should increase their sodium intake cautiously.
Systemic arterial vasodilatation has been implicated in the pathogenesis of sodium retention in cirrhosis. Hydrophobic bile acids, which have vasodilatory actions, may be involved. Ursodeoxycholic acid, a hydrophilic bile acid, could potentially decrease systemic arterial vasodilatation, possibly due to its antioxidant effects, and improve sodium handling in cirrhosis. The effects of ursodeoxycholic acid on systemic, renal and forearm haemodynamics, liver function and renal sodium handling were assessed in vasodilated cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites treated with a transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt (TIPS). Eight cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites without TIPS placement served as controls for the sodium handling effects of ursodeoxycholic acid. From 1 month post TIPS, seven patients were studied before, after 1 month of treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid (15 mg.day-1.kg-1) and at 1 month follow-up. Lipid peroxidation products were used as indices of its antioxidant effects. Ursodeoxycholic acid caused a significant reduction in sodium excretion in both groups (P<0.05). This, in the post-TIPS patients (urinary sodium excretion: 35+/-8 mmol/day at 1 month versus 93+/-21 mmol/day at baseline, P<0.05), was due to a significant increase in sodium reabsorption proximal to the distal tubule (P<0.05), without any significant changes in systemic, renal or forearm haemodynamics, or in liver function. No significant change in lipid peroxidation products was observed. We conclude that: (i) in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites, ursodeoxycholic acid causes sodium retention, (ii) the abnormality in sodium handling in the post-TIPS cirrhotic patients appears to be the result of a direct effect on the proximal nephron, suggesting that factors other than systemic vasodilatation also contribute to sodium retention in cirrhosis, (iii) caution should be exercised in administering ursodeoxycholic acid in cirrhotic patients with ascites.