Biomedical subjects

L C Gomez-Dahl

Publications and source records attributed to L C Gomez-Dahl.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1998

Temporal effects of nicotine nasal spray and gum on nicotine withdrawal symptoms.

Nicotine nasal spray and nicotine gum have been found to be effective in relieving nicotine withdrawal symptoms. In this randomized single-blind study, 91 cigarette smokers were randomly assigned to a single 1 mg dose of active nicotine nasal spray (n=29), active 4 mg nicotine gum (n=31), saline placebo nasal spray (n=16) or placebo gum (n=15). Following overnight abstinence, subjects repeatedly completed visual analog scales for assessing nicotine withdrawal symptoms over 30 min preceding (time -30 min to time 0) and 120 min following a single dose of study medication. This sequence was performed 3 times during the day. Nicotine withdrawal symptoms were assessed on a 41-point visual analog scale (1=no withdrawal, 41=extreme withdrawal). At the initial session only, blood samples for serum nicotine levels were taken at baseline, then at 5, 10, 30 and 120 min following study drug administration. The mean (+/-SD) age of the subjects was 38.6 (+/-10.1) years, 48% were females, smoking rate was 24.5 (+/-7.8) cigarettes per day, and years of smoking was 19.9 (+/-10.0). A single 1 mg dose of nicotine nasal spray provided more immediate relief for craving for a cigarette compared to a single 4 mg dose of nicotine gum. Serum venous nicotine levels for the active nicotine nasal spray and nicotine gum were comparable at 5 and 10 min while the levels were higher for nicotine gum at 30 and 120 min. Changes in withdrawal symptoms were not found to be related to serum venous nicotine levels. Our findings provide a rationale for the as needed use of nicotine nasal spray to control withdrawal symptoms, possibly in combination with other medications with longer acting effects.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Nicotine nasal spray for smoking cessation: pattern of use, side effects, relief of withdrawal symptoms, and cotinine levels.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent of side effects during the initial use of nicotine nasal spray for smoking cessation. DESIGN: We performed a one-sample, noncomparative, open-label evaluation of the pattern of use, side effects, relief of withdrawal symptoms, and cotinine levels with nicotine nasal spray. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Adult smokers were recruited to use the nicotine nasal spray for smoking cessation at a dosage of 1 to 2 mg/h. Subjects completed daily diaries, which included an assessment of nicotine withdrawal symptoms, previously reported irritant effects of the nicotine nasal spray, and symptoms of nicotine toxicity. A plasma cotinine level was measured at baseline and at day 7 for calculation of percentage replacement. RESULTS: The mean age of the 50 study subjects was 43.7 years, 46% were women, and the mean baseline smoking rate was 28.5 cigarettes per day. We found an increase in five symptoms (runny nose, nasal irritation, throat irritation, watering eyes, and sneezing) that had been essentially absent before initiation of use of the nicotine nasal spray. All but throat irritation decreased significantly during days 0 through 7 of the study. The mean daily frequency of nicotine nasal spray use for the first week was 15.0 doses. Use of the nasal spray decreased significantly (P<0.001) during the initial 8 weeks of treatment. The mean percentage cotinine replacement for those subjects who were abstinent at day 7 was 38.6%. CONCLUSION: Although nicotine nasal spray causes substantial irritant side effects during the first few days of use, these adverse effects decrease significantly within the first week. Despite these side effects, subjects continued to use the nicotine nasal spray and experienced a high rate of initial abstinence from smoking.

Administration, Inhalation↗

PubMed1997

Cost-effectiveness of treating nicotine dependence: the Mayo Clinic experience.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of treating nicotine dependence, expressed as cost per net year of life gained by smoking cessation. DESIGN: A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted of a cohort of consecutive adult patients treated for nicotine dependence from April 1988 through December 1992 at the Mayo Clinic Nicotine Dependence Center (NDC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study cohort consisted of 5,544 patients (50.8% female; mean age, 47.8 years) with a mean baseline smoking rate of 25.4 cigarettes per day. After an initial consultation, a nonphysician counselor developed an individual nicotine dependence treatment plan, which could include follow-up counseling, nicotine replacement therapy (patches or gum), group therapy, or an inpatient program. A relapse-prevention program included telephone calls and a series of letters to the patient. We computed the years of life gained for each person specific to age, gender, smoking rate at entry, and 6-month smoking status by using published mortality rates for current and former cigarette smokers. The 6-month smoking status was assumed to be applicable at 1 year. For subsequent determinations, we modeled by computer simulation the year-by-year (to age 100) smoking status by using published relapse and late cessation rates. Coupled with treatment costs, this information allowed the expression of cost per net year of life gained by stopping smoking. Net years of life gained, discounted 0, 3, and 5%, were computed with use of cessation and relapse rates expected for patients not seen in the NDC. Treatment costs were based on 1993 rates for the intervention services but did not include any tobacco product cost savings associated with smoking cessation. RESULTS: The 1-year smoking-cessation rate was 22.2%. With all NDC patients included, the estimated net years of life gained, with use of a 5% rate of discount for benefits, was 0.058, and the corresponding cost was $6,828 per net year of life gained. CONCLUSION: In comparison with the cost-effectiveness of other medical services, the cost of $6,828 per net year of life gained by treatment of nicotine dependence is relatively inexpensive. Such cost-outcome data are important as economic considerations are applied for optimal allocation of limited health-care resources. Nonphysician health-care professionals can assume a key role in the provision of cost-effective nicotine dependence intervention.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Nicotine patch therapy in adolescent smokers.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, tolerance, and efficacy of 24-hour nicotine patch therapy in adolescent smokers who were trying to stop smoking. DESIGN: Nonrandomized, open-label, 6-month clinical trial. SETTING: Five public high schools in the Rochester, MN, area. SUBJECTS: Twenty-two adolescent smokers, aged 13 through 17 years, with current smoking rate of 20 or more cigarettes per day (cpd). INTERVENTION: Daily nicotine patch therapy for 8 weeks (22 mg/d for 6 weeks followed by 11 mg/d for 2 weeks). Weekly individual behavioral counseling and group support continued for 8 weeks with follow up visits at 3 and 6 months and a mailed survey at 1 year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported smoking abstinence verified by expired air carbon monoxide of 8 ppm or less, nicotine withdrawal symptoms, adverse experiences, and blood cotinine levels. RESULTS: Subjects had a mean +/- SD smoking rate of 23.3 +/- 5.0 (range, 20 to 35) cpd at study entry and 2.6 +/- 1.6 years of smoking; the mean age was 15.9 +/- 1.2 (range 13 through 17) years, and 68% were girls. Of the 22 participants, 19 (86%) completed patch therapy, 3 (14%) had biochemically validated smoking cessation at week 8, and 1 continued to be smoke free at 3 and 6 months after patch initiation. There was a significant decrease from baseline in the mean nicotine withdrawal scores for days 4 and 7 of week 1 and the mean for weeks 2 through 8. Skin reactions were the most common adverse event. As the worst skin reactions, 55% had erythema only, 5% had erythema and edema, and 9% had erythema and vesicles, whereas 32% had no skin reactions. Other reported adverse events were headaches (41%), nausea and vomiting (41%), tiredness (41%), dizziness (27%), and arm pain (23%). None of these were considered serious, life threatening, or led to the discontinuation of patch therapy. In adults with comparable smoking rates, we found that the adolescents had lower blood cotinine levels. Those smoking 20 to 25 cpd had cotinine levels of 146 +/- 84 (adolescents) vs 260 +/- 98 (adults) ng/ml, and those smoking 26 to 35 cpd had levels of 169 +/- 73 vs 276 +/- 110 ng/ml, respectively. CONCLUSION: Nicotine patch therapy seems safe in adolescent smokers. Placebo-controlled trials are needed to establish the efficacy of nicotine patch therapy in adolescents.

Administration, Cutaneous↗